FINANCIAL  STATEMENT  ANALYSIS 

           "When you go into the stock market you're competing with professionals.'" [1] "[T]he obfuscatory verbiage of people who speak Wall Street [] treat finance as a kind of secret, clubby code.... [They] deride dabbling investors." [2] In order to succeed, an investor needs to understand the language of business.

           "Accounting is said to be the language of business. Great investors are skilled at financial statement analysis. It allows them to look at the past and project the future. … Numbers tell a story. Financial statements are the report cards of the companies." [3] "Even after disclosure, the numbers that some companies report are based on accounting methodologies so complex, involving such a high degree of guesswork, that it can't easily be determined precisely how they were arrived at. Hard to understand doesn't necessarily mean inaccurate or illegal, of course. But, some companies take advantage of often-loose accounting rules to massage their numbers to make their results look better. … [T]he [] problem is for investors to figure out how accurately the numbers reflect a company's business. … Hence, companies have an incentive to use aggressive -- but, under the rules, acceptable -- accounting to boost their reported earnings and prop up their stock price. In the worst-case scenario, that means some companies put out misleading financial accounts." [4]

           "Experience is the best teacher, but the tuition is high." [5] Our Excel-based spreadsheetHistorical Analysis v2.3 (HAv2.3)might be able to short cut the learning process for you and your wallet.  HAv2.3 provides you with an organized and credible means to work through the somewhat indecipherable information in financial statements.  

         Instead of depending on others to oversee your stock investments, it is essential to cultivate self-reliance for achieving success. Financial advisors often find it easier to persuade individuals that they possess knowledge, rather than actually having profound knowledge themselves. "Consultancies choose new employees in part based on their ability to project answers with confidence. … '[A]nswering a case perfectly but nervously will get you rejected.'" [6] "New research from Shanghai Advanced Institute of Finance similarly finds that comely managers of mutual funds lure more investments and enjoy more promotions than their homelier counterparts, even though their funds don't perform as well. The researchers suggest this performance gap may be because handsome managers approach risk with hubristic levels of confidence. … Basically, we tend to assume that good looks are a sign of intelligence, trustworthiness and good character…." [7]

          "Who should you trust for investment advice? ... Surely they'd be investing their own money in their ideas ... and ideally their wealth would derive more from their own personal investing returns [rather] than from selling their ideas to people like you." [8] "Most people on Wall Street don't make money by investing—they make money by helping others invest, charging a hefty fee for their service. Warren Buffett called these people the 'helpers,' and warned investors to avoid them at all costs. The reason: very few people have the skill to beat the market. …  The helpers, of course, are well aware of this. So, in order to try to be one of the chosen few who beat the market, they take more risk, swinging for more home runs instead of more reliable singles and doubles. That's what can lead to big losses…. The lesson: Stay away from money managers who charge hefty fees for complex strategies." [9] "[W]hile many people believe that the essential skill of being a hedge fund manager is picking good investments, in fact the essential skill is continuing to run a large hedge fund that pays them a lot of money. ... Building a robust institution with high fees, loyal investors and long lockups is a deeper and more fundamental skill than picking the right stocks." [10] "[A]s funds get bigger, their income from management fees, which is based on the amount of assets they have, grows. That gives managers fewer incentives to improve performance." [11] "Fund investors… [have a] chronic compulsion to chase hot performance and flee when it goes cold. Such buy-high-and-sell-low behavior tends to flood fund managers with cash at times when stocks have already risen in price—and to force the funds to sell stocks after a decline. The managers can perform only as well as their worst investors allow them to. … If fund managers could stick to only their best ideas, they might do better. But owning just a handful of stocks could create tax and regulatory headaches—and would expose the managers to massive withdrawals (and loss of fees) if returns faltered. So most portfolio managers own too many stocks to focus on their best ideas…. " [12]           

          Self-reliance may be the answer. "Amateur investors have always had advantages over professionals: They can't get fired for underperformance, don't have to incur commissions and other fees, and don't have clients who give them money (and take it away) at the worst time. They can invest for the long run and ignore the short term." [13]  "One advantage small investors have over professionals: They don't have to worry about reporting performance to clients. That helps some individuals feel comfortable riding out market downturns." [14]

       Our investment strategy is rooted in analyzing financial statements and has been thoroughly tested, backtested and validated. With HAv2.3, you have the ability to identify value stocks for investment and also prevent investing in companies that are facing financial difficulties. This allows you to make informed decisions before the stock market prices adjust to reflect the true state of these companies. Please review our Sample Analyses.  "By backtesting —applying hindsight to past data and pretending that a hypothetical portfolio had been run that way all along—financial marketers can make outperformance look ridiculously easy. … Of course, you can't completely ignore the past when you project the future. To protect yourself against backtests that foretell nothing, ask questions like these: If this idea is so great, why weren't these guys using it at the beginning of the period instead of only at the end? Why wasn't everybody using it? How long has the strategy actually been used, and with how much money? Has it been tracked over even longer periods than reported in the backtested data? How many other strategies were backtested but abandoned? Do the past numbers include trading costs? If the answers don't make sense, don't invest." (WSJ, 5/31/24, "When Past Performance Doesn’t Even Predict Past Performance")

        HAv2.3's quality of earnings analyses comprise several numerical formulations of the fundamental principle that "distorting one section of the financial statements throws the numbers out of whack in some other section." [15]

       On the investment side, it can be beneficial to consider slowly accumulating or purchasing stocks at lower market prices, as long as those stocks are still financially stable and not at risk of bankruptcy. However, it is crucial to have the necessary emotional resilience, patience, and financial resources to endure potential market fluctuations. "[S]uccessful investing depends, at most, 10% on knowing what to do and at least 90% on knowing what not to do." [16]  On the other hand.... "Here's the lesson... After a stock has fallen so hard, there's a tendency to think it has already been pummeled enough, so the worst must surely be over. … But if I have learned nothing else over the years, and should be exceedingly clear here: It's that just because a stock gets hammered doesn't mean it can't get hammered even more." [17] HAv2.3 analyses reveal the quality of stock-investment opportunities. 

        "The market wisdom that sounds the easiest can be the hardest to follow. Take 'buy low, sell high.' Buying low and selling high is logically sound but emotionally harrowing. That's because it requires buying something that feels risky because it just went down, while selling something that feels safer because it has just gone up. … Whenever markets move sharply up or down, it's human nature to want to take action. … Taking calm, contrarian action in a crazy world is a great way to restore balance not only to your portfolio but to your frame of mind." [18] HAv2.3 helps to recognize stock-investment entry points and exists. 

        If you have any inquiries, feedback, or suggestions, please feel free to reach out to us at: FSA@ConcernedShareholders.com.



[1] Investors Chronicle, 3/28/19, "Spotting Red Flags"

[2] New York Times [NYT], 9/14/23, "'Dumb Money' Review: Revenge of the Amateur Stock Traders"

[3] Manila Times, 1/10/22, "Skills and habits you need in investing"

[4] Wall Street Journal [WSJ], 1/25/02, "Deciphering the Black BoxMany Accounting Practices, Not Just Enron's, Are Hard to Penetrate"   

[5] WSJ, 8/13/20, "This Investment Burned Almost Everyone...."

[6] WSJ, 3/17/23, "'The Big Con' Review: The Conquering Consultants; Why are corporate executives and government officials so often bamboozled by the expensive consultants they hire?"

[7] WSJ, 6/10/23, "The Moral Hazards of Being Beautiful; Research shows that attractive people tend to receive unearned esteem from others and cultivate self-serving beliefs"

[8] Bloomberg - Money Stuff, 5/22/19, "Who should you trust for investment advice?"

[9] NextBigIdeaClub, 6/12/23, "Chaos Kings: How Wall Street Traders Make Billions in the New Age of Crisis"

[10] Bloomberg - Money Stuff, 7/2/20, "Farewell John Paulson"

[11] WSJ, 12/8/20, "Some Small Hedge Funds Reap Big Gains in Tough Times...."

[12] WSJ, 4/14/23, "Want to Beat the Stock Market? … Professional fund managers labor under handicaps that individual investors don't face. …"

[13] WSJ, 1/27/21, "Intelligent Investor: Bulls, Bears and Starlings"

[14] WSJ, 10/23/23, "Who You Calling Dumb Money? Everyday Investors Do Just Fine"

[15] Financial Statement Analysis A Practitioner's Guide by Martin S. Fridson  

[16] WSJ, 8/25/20, "Liquidity That Quenches No One's Thirst"

[17] Substack.com, 7/18/23, "Red Flag Alert"

[18]  WSJ, 5/1/20, "Finding Your Balance in a Topsy-Turvy Market…."

 

 

INTRODUCTION - Financial Statement Analysis Applied to Stock-Market Investing

            The Investment Process

            Investor Psychological Traits

            The Market Cycle: Up

            The Market Cycle: Down

            The Opportunity

            Value Investing

 

I.        The need to "do" complex

II.       Financial Statement Analysis can "do" complex

            A.    Background

            B.    Historical Analysis v2.3

            C.    Projection v2.3

III.     Recommended Readings

IV.     Learn By Negative Examples

V.       An Approach to Stock Investing 

VI.      Financial Statements in the News

VII.    Sample Analyses

           Disclaimer

 

 

 

Financial Statement Analysis Applied to

 

Stock-Market Investing

 

        Successful stock market investing necessitates a strong foundation in financial knowledge, a comprehension of collective behavior, and a positive mindset. "[T]he penalties for financial ignorance have never been so stiff." [1] "If we truly ... can't make heads or tails of a complicated set of [financial] statements, we pass and move on." [2] "[I]f you invest blindly you stand an excellent chance of being blind-sided." [3]

        In order to achieve success in investing, it is crucial to possess a strong sense of mental discipline. "'Patience is one of the most important things in our business,' [CFA Howard] Marks said. 'And what I like to point out is that sometimes we have a sense for what's going to happen. We never know when. Most of the important things that happen in our business ... are primarily attributable to changes in psychology, not fundamentals.... And psychology cannot be predicted and certainly cannot be timed.'" [4]

        HAv2.3 helps achieve disciplined investing and financial success. 

        The Investment Process

        "In 1970, [Peter L. Bernstein] ... counseled investors to take big risks with small amounts of money rather than small risks with big amounts of money." [5]

       "Investing isn't about mastering the markets; it's about mastering yourself. … To be an intelligent investor doesn't require a stratospheric IQ. It does require discipline and the ability to think for yourself. …[I]ndividual investors are 'scarcely ever' forced to sell stocks or funds and—unlike professional portfolio managers who are continually measured against the market—are never compelled to care what other investors are doing. That independence is your single most valuable asset, a luxury most professional investors can only dream of possessing. … [I]t has never been harder to be a disciplined and independent investor. … After all, it often makes sense—and just feels right—to join the herd. … [B]ucking the consensus engages circuits in the brain that generate pain and disgust. Experiments have shown that when you find out your peers disagree with you, your choices become up to three times more likely to match theirs, although you have no conscious awareness of being influenced. … Instead of seeking to fulfill their own financial goals, they will strive to beat everybody else, becoming up to twice as likely to buy a risky stock. …  Because you may never realize how much a group is influencing your decisions, it's vital to protect yourself before you join the crowd. … Instead of investing based on the whims of the crowd, follow policies and procedures. …  Use a checklist to focus on the stability of the underlying business rather than share-price movements. Have I read the company's financial reports? Do its executives ... use conservative accounting ... ? … After thoroughly filtering companies, put your favorites on a watchlist. Set limit orders in your brokerage account to buy them automatically if they drop, say, 25% in price. That way, you lock yourself into doing the opposite of the crowd." (WSJ, 11/17/24, "You're Not Paranoid. The Market Is Out to Get You.") Now that you are in, what about getting out with a profit and a smile?

          "It all starts with a well-defined process that is executed with a high degree of discipline. ... There are a lot of smart people in the investment business, but not very many of them are consistently successful. ... We think the reason is that not many of them have a truly well-defined process and are truly disciplined in executing it." [6] "In this world, data can be used to make sense of mind-bogglingly complex situations. Data can help compensate for our overconfidence in our own intuitions and can help reduce the extent to which our desires distort our perceptions." [7] "[B]iases are hard-wired into our brains and personalities: Some of us are overconfident, taking excessive risks; others too meek, seeking to avoid losses at the first sign of trouble. … Some mistakes [] arise from the tendency to feel pain from a loss more acutely than pleasure from a gain. Investors sell too quickly when holdings take a few hits, and hesitate to build big positions in stocks they like. … It's one thing to be aware of behavioral biases; it's another to keep them in check." [8]

          "[R]esearch shows that ... focusing first on the positives of a purchase or decision makes it harder to come up with the negatives—and vice versa. ... When you're weighing an offer or decision, always start with your list of 'cons' before considering the 'pros.' It may save you a bundle." [9]

        "Companies, if granted the leeway, will surely present their financial results in the best possible light. And of course they will try to persuade investors that the calculations they prefer, in which certain costs are excluded, best represent the reality in their operations. …  But these are actual costs, notes Jack T. Ciesielski, publisher of The Analyst's Accounting Observer. 'Selectively ignoring facts can lead to investor carelessness in evaluating a company's performance and lead to sloppy investment decisions,' he wrote. … It puzzles some accounting experts that the Securities and Exchange Commission has not been more aggressive about reining in this practice. … The bottom line for investors, according to Mr. Ciesielski … is to ignore the allure of the make-believe. Real-world numbers may be less heartening, but they are also less likely to generate those ugly surprises that can come from accentuating the positive." [10]

        "Mr. [Howard M.] Schilit's firm, the Center for Financial Research and Analysis, scours corporations' books.... He says his sleuthing cannot pinpoint fraud. Rather, examining public documents often turns up gimmicks or aggressive accounting aimed at camouflaging problems. 'You never have a smoking gun,' he said. 'So you have to be careful about alleging wrongdoing. My job is to find an early sign of problems.'" [11]

        "[M]ost value investors are being put out of business….  [M]ost market participants these days are not trained or experienced in value investing…. Fewer players means there's no one to notice what’s happening to these companies and 'nobody knows what anything is worth,' [David] Einhorn said. 'So there's an enormous number of companies that are dramatically mis-valued in ways that we haven't seen before.'"[12] Mis-valued on the low side means buying opportunities for those who do financial statement analysis!

        Investor Psychological Traits

        "Happiness from wealth comes from gains of wealth more than it comes from levels of wealth. While gains of wealth brings happiness, losses of wealth brings misery." [13]

        "'What's the personality of the most successful investors?' asked William Bernstein, a neurologist.... 'They aren't affected by other people's feelings. In fact, the most empathetic people I know are the worst investors.'" [14] "As the late economist Charles Kindleberger put it: 'There is nothing as disturbing to one's well-being and judgment as to see a friend get rich. Unless it is to see a non-friend get rich.'" [15] "Just look at financial markets now. An activity that people have historically pursued in isolation—buying and selling stocks and other assets—has become the hottest way to socialize. … But what investors need most at a time like this isn't affirmation from hordes of strangers who think alike." [16]

         "When investors have different goals and time horizons—and they do in every asset class—prices that look ridiculous for one person make sense to another, because the factors worth paying attention to are totally different. … Bubbles form when the momentum of short-term returns attracts enough money that the makeup of investors shifts from mostly long term to mostly short term. … Bubbles aren't so much about people irrationally participating in long-term investing. They're about people somewhat rationally moving toward short-term trading to capture momentum that had been feeding on itself. What do you expect people to do when momentum creates a big short-term return potential? Sit and watch patiently? Never. … And the short-term traders that flood in operate in an area where the rules governing long-term investing—particularly around valuation—are ignored, because they're irrelevant to the game being played. … Few things matter more in investing than understanding your own time horizon and not being persuaded by the price actions caused by people with different time horizons." [17]

         "What will financial marketers sell….? The same thing they always sell: whatever did the best last year. … [Y]ou'll hear a lot about what was hot. … Those who were up the most always brag the loudest. … Extreme performance can last for a while, but it can't persist indefinitely. … It takes determination to resist the easy temptation of chasing whatever has been hot…. If you're tempted to play catch-up out of fear of missing out, at least limit the amount you put at risk. …  If you don't think you can stay that course, then … declar[e], up front, that you have no interest in chasing whatever has been hot. … That silences the hype. That opens your mind to the kinds of neglected opportunities that often do best when last year's market darlings fall from grace. And that keeps you from expecting the coming year to repeat the past year. They seldom do." [18]

        "Great investors … practice trying to disprove their investing assumptions to determine whether they are correct. … [I]nvestors often wall themselves off from new information that could threaten their views. … The common culprits in all this are two quirks of the human mind that psychologists call confirmation bias and hindsight bias. The first drives us to seek and favor evidence that confirms our pre-existing beliefs while ignoring warning signs that we might be wrong. The second compels us, after everyone knows the outcome, to believe we saw it coming all along. … A few techniques can help combat these cognitive biases. Shun peer pressure from social media or the internet. … Listen for signals that you might be off base. … To be a good investor, you have to be right much of the time. To be a great investor, you have to recognize how often you may be wrong." [19] "So, don't ask, 'What should I do?' Instead ask, 'How can I keep myself from doing anything?' ... [E]xperts in behavioral finance say the pain we suffer from losses is far greater than the pleasure we get from gains. Results? Investors who follow their stocks closely can be miserable, no matter what the market's general direction. After all, even in good years, stocks—on a daily basis—are likely to be down as often as they go up. What to do? Stick your head in the sand. ... [D]on't read the newspaper stock tables." [20] One way to potentially alleviate this negative outcome is by utilizing stop-buy/sell orders and market-price alerts.

        "In the summer of 1720, shares in the South Sea Co. and other leading stocks roared to all-time highs as speculators chased instant profits. … They all were sucked in by a perfect magnetic storm: the rapid advent of newspapers, ready loans at low interest rates, and exciting narratives about technological innovation. Above all was the eternal human desire to be part of the in crowd, or what we today would call FOMO, fear of missing out. … As word spreads that 'everybody' is doing something, it can be hard for anybody to resist joining. Humans have a profound need to belong to a group. Investing in something popular makes us feel popular. … The South Sea bubble did have many critics at the time. But conformity is a powerful force that can counteract gravity for longer than skeptics often expect." [21] "[W]hen markets seem to be breaking records every day, your emotions naturally prompt you to buy high, not to sell. Even the world's greatest investors find selling harder than buying. Peter Lynch, former manager of the Fidelity Magellan fund, has said his 'greatest mistakes' were selling at the wrong time. That's largely because of the unbearable feeling of FOMO, fear of missing out. Sell a winner too soon, and you have to watch from the sidelines as it continues to soar. The most you could have lost from keeping it is 100%, but the gains you can miss out on by selling too soon are unlimited. It hurts not to buy an asset that goes on to become a huge winner. But it stings far worse to sell one. That's an active decision, easier to imagine undoing. That focuses your attention on the mistake, making you feel you should have made a different decision and filling you with regret. … Yes, missing out on future gains could be painful. Missing out on future losses won't be. In the long run, adding or keeping hot assets only because they are hot, not because you think they are undervalued, is the surest way to get burned." [22](WSJ, 4/23/21, "How to Keep Your Cool When Markets Are Sizzling") "That gets to the moral of this story: No matter how much lip service investors give to learning the lessons of the past, they really are like a herd.... They understandably prefer the adrenaline rush of being part of the popular crowd, and as much as they should know better, really do fear missing out on something big." [23](On the Street, 6/11/23, "Welcome to Fantasyland")

        "People buy things that are going up, especially when they're feeling rich. It's called the 'momentum' strategy, and it generally works very well, until it doesn't." [24] "I once defined a bull market as 'a period of rising prices that leads many investors to believe that their IQ has risen at least as much as the market value of their portfolios. After the inevitable fall in prices, they will learn that both increases were temporary.' ... [S]tay humble!" [25] "Financial adviser and historian William Bernstein, in his new book The Delusions Of Crowds: Why People Go Mad in Groups, calls this 'vehemence, verging on raw anger, directed at doubters,' and says it is often the final phase of financial bubbles. … Perhaps anger tends to foreshadow the end of financial manias because it makes skepticism almost impossible." [26] "It's a bubble, according to a survey of retail stock investors. And they don't want to miss it. … Stocks have been on a tear for more than a year, and bubble warnings have rung out during most of that time." [27]

        "The businesses have little in common, but all rely for high valuations on buyers willing to bet on a story—and have benefited from the surge in individuals trading stocks. … [Those] assets [] look more like gambling tokens than ownership rights[.] … [S]peculative stocks and crypto depend for their value on stories, not on reported earnings." [28] "Cryptocurrency ... [is] backed by no government, is all but impossible to use and serves no legal need." [29] "The stocks of E.V. companies have already risen to shockingly high levels. And some have yet to make any cars, let alone profits. … [T]he mania also reflects the general bullishness that has swept up many assets, which can be hard to link to traditional financial fundamentals.  The run up in share prices illustrates investors' enthusiasm…. Take Lucid Motors, which started delivering sedans…. Lucid's shares, which have more than doubled in the past month, give the company a market value of nearly $90 billion, or $10 billion more than Ford, which sold nearly 4.2 million cars last year. Rivian, an electric pickup maker that has yet to start selling vehicles, went public last week and is now worth $127 billion, or more than G.M. And then there is Tesla, of course, worth over $1 trillion, or as much as nearly every major carmaker combined. … Aswath Damodaran, a New York University professor who is considered an authority on valuing companies, isn't so sure about all of this. 'Let's be quite honest,' Damodaran told DealBook. 'Wall Street analysts are not valuing Rivian or Lucid. They are chasing the price, and finding ways to rationalize it.'" [30]

        "[Y]ou got to know—When to hold 'em—Know when to fold 'em—Know when to walk away—Know when to run…." [31] "[T]he investor commandment [is] get out in time." [32] "[I]nstitutional investors … mostly pay attention to buying, not selling….  [T]hey just sell whatever has gone up a lot, or whatever has gone down a lot. … The basic folksy rule-of-thumb wisdom for buying is about fundamentals, but for selling it's usually about price action. Not always: One classic maxim is that you should dispassionately re-analyze each position each day, and if you wouldn'nt buy it now you should sell it. But just typing it like that makes me suspect that it is an ideal that no one really lives up to. It sounds like a lot of work!" [33] (Using HAv2.3 involves a lot of worth.) "They actually do OK figuring out what to buy. But they need to do a better job unloading stuff. … Purchase decisions are forward-looking, conducive to an analytical process that seem to be consistent and quantifiable. Selling stock in a portfolio is backward-looking; the retrospective nature seems to be susceptible to the kinds of behavioral biases and cognitive errors we typically think of as common among non-professional investors. … You might think that selling stock, so important to the total return of any portfolio, was a well-understood science. But you would be wrong. Instead, asset managers often lack any sound analytical framework for selling, using crude rules of thumb or gut instinct, neither of which has a good record for yielding positive results. Indeed, the most common reason to sell seems to be to buy the next great investment idea." [34] "'Ask yourself: Would I buy it now?' at the current price. 'If so, stay with it. If not, let it go,' Mr. [Marc] Gerstein [Director of Investment Research at Multex." Bernard Baruch noted, "I made my money by selling too soon." (See, An Approach to Stock Investing, below.)   

        "When looking at success, the first step is understanding why you succeeded. Was it luck? Hard work? Innate talent? ... When we only focus on outcomes, we miss important information about what went right (and wrong) and why. ... Analyzing successes ... should be mandatory. The military holds 'after-action reviews' ... irrespective of outcome. ... [D]iscuss four key questions: What did we set out to do? What actually happened? Why did it happen? What are we going to do next time?" [35] "We use outcomes as a simple indicator and then weave narratives around these views. We take a difficult problem, simplify it (are the results good or bad?) and then create a story to justify the outcome. ... There are no easy solutions here but being beholden to outcomes alone is by no means a panacea. ... [U]sing outcomes as a proxy for sound decision making in investment is anything but." [36]

       "[I]f we learned anything in this crisis, it is that most of the sophisticated financial professionals in the world were no better at predicting the market than some amateur investors. [37] "To become a market-destroying 'it' group on Wall Street, you need some arrogance, enough brains to justify making huge financial bets, utter cluelessness about lessons from finance's booms and busts, and a sincere belief that your unique contributions to Wall Street will mean, ahem, that this time it really is different, so old truths can be ignored. ... Everybody knows, though, that to really be part of Wall Street's elite, you've got to have contempt for the little people." [38]

         "'Investing is more than something utilitarian,' says Meir Statman, a finance professor at Santa Clara University and an expert in behavioral finance. 'People get pleasure from it. It's thrill-seeking behavior. It occupies time. People use investing the way other people go to concerts or go to parties.' … But these days, when indexers sin, often they sin by loading up on value stocks, those companies that are cheap compared with current earnings or corporate assets. Recent academic studies -- most notably a June 1992 Journal of Finance article by professors Eugene Fama and Kenneth French -- suggest that you can earn market-beating returns by buying value stocks. … But activity is so much more fun than inactivity, so we end up trading more than we should. … I would cap the 'fun money' portion of your portfolio at 5%." [39] "Technology can make investing easy and fun. It can also downplay risk in ways that may lead novices astray. … Robinhood has become so popular largely because it helps get new investors started by making the stock market feel fun and engaging. … [R]obinhood … makes me wonder whether it has created a game in which many of the most vulnerable players may end up being played." [40]

         "For some people, it seems, nothing has become too stupid to speculate on, as long as you can be reasonably confident that somebody even stupider will buy it from you at a higher price. … In that case, why not buy something that's a total joke? The answer, of course, is the same as it's always been: Sooner or later, after every marginal fool has piled in, you will end up looking to your right and looking to your left and then realizing, with a sudden chill running down your spine, that only one greater fool is left, and it's you." [41]

        "Behavioral mistakes are particularly rife in the small-cap stock pool, where investors make bigger errors because they tend to have less information and companies generally receive less scrutiny than your Alphabets and Apples…. If the company's fundamentals are sound and investors are fleeing while insiders are buying … the crowd is making an emotionally fueled mistake. … [T]he babies [are] being thrown out with the bath water." [42]

        "'Investors hate uncertainty.' Well, that's just tough. Uncertainty is all investors ever have gotten, or ever will get, from the moment barley and sesame first began trading in ancient Mesopotamia to the last trade that will ever take place on Planet Earth. ... The only true certainty is surprise." [43] "Part of what makes bear markets so unbearable is that nobody—and I mean nobody—knows when or how they will end. … Bear markets sometimes end in a selling frenzy, but they often end in an indifferent stupor." [44]

        "Knowing he owns good businesses, Mr. Buffett wants prices to go down, not up, so he can buy even more shares more cheaply before the bounce back. ... [A] bear market is a gift from the financial gods--and the longer it lasts, the better off you will be. Instead of running from the bear, you should embrace him. ... The real secret to being, or becoming, an intelligent investor is bolstering your self-control. ... [T]hose who can take the pain of a bear market ... will ultimately triumph, by patiently amassing greater and greater equity positions at better and better prices." [45] "[I]f you have plenty of cash and courage to withstand further declines, other people's fear could be your cue to act. … 'It is sometimes said that to be an intelligent investor, you must be unemotional. That isn't true; instead, you should be inversely emotional.' That means market declines don't have to be a cause of consternation. They can be an opportunity." [46] "The next time the stock market crashes, we all will step forward and buy stocks boldly--at least in our imaginations. But buying stocks when the market collapses is far harder to do than to imagine. … [F]ocus[] on a small number of stocks trading at low multiples of their value as businesses… [B]uy when blood was running in the streets…. [B]ear markets are so unpredictable that reliably sidestepping them is nearly impossible—and that the pain of losing money is nearly unbearable. … Since, over the long run, stocks tend to go up more than they go down, one of the greatest advantages an investor can have is the gumption to buy stocks aggressively in falling markets. That requires both cash and courage. … [S]teel your courage. Write a binding contract with yourself, witnessed by a friend or family member, committing you to buy more stocks when they fall 25%, 50% or more. Years from now, you will be glad you did." [47]

        Now, with all this positive feedback, one only needs to understand the methods for evaluating the value of businesses. Consider utilizing the HAv2.3 framework.


[1] The Ascent of Money (2008) by Niall Ferguson.

[2] WSJ, 8/6/02, "We Need Better Stock Analysis, Not More Info"

[3] Savannah Morning News, 3/10/02, "Maneuvering Around 'Earnings' First Step in Making Solid Investments"

[4] Enterprising Investor, 2/19/19, "Howard Marks, CFA: Getting the Odds on Your Side"

[5] WSJ, 6/13/09, "Risk-Management Pioneer and Best-Selling Author Never Stopped Insisting Future Is Unknowable"

[6] WSJ, 11/7/05, "He Recruits Managers with Passion and Focus for Stocking-Picking Teams"

[7] NYT, 2/18/13, "What Data Can't Do"

[8] Barron's, 11/2/18, "How to Take Fear Out of Your Investing Decisions"

[9] WSJ, 8/12/09, "Fraud Doesn't Always Happen to Someone Else"

[10] NYT, 4/22/16, "Fantasy Math Is Helping Companies Spin Losses Into Profits"

[11] NYT, 1/4/04, "Once a Cassandra, Now a Sage"

[12] Bloomberg, 10/11/22, "David Einhorn Says Value Investing Might Never Come Back"

[13] WSJ, 8/24/09, "The Mistakes We Make—and Why We Make Them....")  

[14] WSJ, 4/3/10, "Time to Take Stock of the Recent Market Rallies"

[15] WSJ, 1/28/21, "GameStop Is a Bubble in Its Purest Form…."

[16] WSJ, 1/22/21, "[O]nline trading buddies can lift you up when you're feeling down. But real-world friends tell you when you're wrong."

[17] Collaborative Fund, 2017, "The Reasonable Formation of Unreasonable Things"

[18] WSJ, 1/8/21, "What We Already Know About Investing … ; It may be tempting to keep riding the wave of hot assets from last year. Do that long enough, and you'll eventually get burned."

[19] WSJ, 12/31/16, "To Be a Great Investor, Worry More About Being Wrong Than Right"

[20] WSJ, 4/1/97, "Advice for Jittery Investors: Sit Tight"

[21] WSJ, 7/18/20, "From 1720 to Tesla, FOMO Never Sleeps; The South Sea bubble is the classic story of an investing mania. Are investors today any wiser?"

[22] WSJ, 4/23/21, "How to Keep Your Cool When Markets Are Sizzling"

[23] On the Street, 6/11/23, "Welcome to Fantasyland"

[24] Axios Markets, 1/7/21, "Battle of the bubbles"

[25] WSJ, 12/1/20, "Plenty to Be Thankful for"

[26] WSJ, 3/9/21, "Investing While Angry"

[27] Bloomberg, 4/12/21, "Day Traders Know a Bubble When They See One, and They Want In"

[28] WSJ, 12/21/21, "Is the Fed Deflating Prospects for Speculative Stocks?...."

[29] Washington Post, 2/27/23, "Opinion: This all-but-forgotten con man sold American on 'fake it till you make it'" 

[30] Bloomberg Deal Book, 11/18/21, "Racing Ahead"

[31] Kenny Rogers - The Gambler Lyrics

[32] Bloomberg, 10/12/18, "Hedge Fund Billionaire Rode the Worst Trade of His Life All the Way Down."

[33] Bloomberg Opinion – Money Stuff, 1/10/19, "What do professional investors do?"

[34] Bloomberg, 1/16/19, "Stock-Pickers Don't Know How to Sell"

[35] WSJ, 5/10/19, "Don't Just Learn From Failure; Learn From Your Successes; When things go right in business, it's crucial to figure out why"

[36] Behavioral Investment, 2/19/19, "Is an Obsession with Outcomes the Most Damaging Investor Bias?"

[37] NYT, 1/14/10, "Wall St. Ethos Under Scrutiny at Hearing"

[38] Bloomberg, 2/3/10, "Quants' can't-lose ideas sink market"

[39] WSJ, 7/15/97, "Getting going: Market exuberance isn't too rational? Sometimes, investors just do it for fun"

[40] WSJ, 12/11/20, "When the Stock Market Is Too Much Fun; Robinhood sure is entertaining. But it's also steering investors toward risky behaviors that could go wrong."

[41] WSJ, 4/20/21, "If the Market's a Joke, Don't Be the Punch Line"

[42] Barron's, 12/31/17, "Profiting From Investors' Mistakes"

[43] WSJ, 9/30/08, "The Depression of 2008? Don't Count on It" 

[44] WSJ, 7/7/22, "What Smart Investors Do in Bear Markets; Since you can't predict the unpredictable, you should control the controllable"

[45] WSJ, 7/12/08, "The Intelligent Investor: Stop Worrying, and Learn to Love the Bear...."  

[46] WSJ, 1/25/22, "Why You Should Sit Out the Mayhem; What matters isn't what the market does—but what you do in response"

[47] WSJ, 10/14/16, "John Maynard Keynes: Courage Is the Key to Investing Keynes…." 

         

         The Market Cycle: Up  

        "[T]he fact that so many people seem to be making big profits on the investment and telling others about their good fortune, makes the investment seem safe and too good to pass up." [1] 

        "Addicts often have to take heavier doses to get the same thrill as time passes. The same is true in aging bull markets. Companies need to report bigger and bigger earnings to get the same rise out of investors. … [I]nvestors are offering skimpier rewards than they did in the past to companies that beat expectations. … That could turn dangerous if companies are tempted to dig ever deeper to show the next penny of profit. … [A]nalysts and companies dance expectations downward in tandem. Analysts … deliberately lowball their earnings estimates, helping companies to beat them and, over time, boosting the stock price. … To call such predictably engineered numbers 'surprises' is almost absurd. … [E]ven though the game is obviously rigged, investors are still playing along. … The companies aren't doing better than expected, the expectations are artificially low. That makes surprises close to meaningless indicator. … [S]omething may well be fundamentally off at a company that comes up short of expectations. In today's market, that red flag is redder than ever. … [B]ear in mind that late bull markets are breeding grounds for temptation, when companies … often can't beat the habit of trying to beat expectations. In 1999 and 2000, some allegedly cheated to keep doing it." [2]

       "Trustify [Inc.]'s case puts a spotlight on a culture of Silicon Valley in which ultra competitive investors might not ask for hard evidence such as official bank statements from startups when they are rushing to invest in a hot funding round that only allows days or hours to commit to an investment. 'If you feel like you need verification of something and are afraid of asking for it because it will throw you out of the deal or someone will really be offended, maybe it's not the right deal for you,' said Stephen Palley, partner at law firm Anderson Kill, who advises startups and investors. … Most seed-stage startups, as well as many Series A startups, don't have audited financial statements or a chief financial officer given the cost of such measures in the earliest stages of a company, according to several venture investors. Two Trustify investors said that they hadn't seen audited financial statements from Trustify. The investors said they didn't know if the company ever had audited financial statements. This due diligence problem is only exacerbated during a heated venture market that had been setting records for valuations and funding levels before the coronavirus pandemic. 'In an overheated environment everyone wants to get in and people can get sloppy,' Mr. Palley said." [3] "[T]here's often a reverse incentive for investors to do too much digging before writing a check. Ask too many tough questions and they risk losing money on their investments or getting shut out of a current or future funding round." [4]

        "Until recently, many investors believed central banks and other policy makers had repealed the business cycle and that making money in the stock market was something you could take for granted…. Maybe investors a century ago and more had a wiser view. They believed … that financial panics were a form of divine retribution for the sinful excesses of prosperity. … [B]elieving that panics have become obsolete is a precondition for their recurrence. The modern history of financial markets is a chronicle of attempts to control risk—if not eliminate it. One after another, they have all failed. … But risk can't be removed; it can only be moved. The techniques … may have caused [] financial crisis … by making bankers and investors so complacent that they never sufficiently tested whether their assumptions might be wrong. … The early U.S. suffered severe financial panics roughly once every 13 years on average, in 1792, 1819, 1826, 1837, 1857, 1873, 1884, 1893 and 1907. … [O]ptimism leads to a 'flood tide of prosperity,' which washes away caution, creating euphoria that culminates in a crash—which, in turn, clears the way for recovery. … The longer the good times roll, the more remote the chance of a decline will seem, the more overconfident investors will feel and the more risk they will take. … [I]t isn't investments that make or lose money; it is investors, with our own excesses of greed and fear. … Blind faith in tools for controlling financial risk has never made sense. If risk could ever be eliminated, investors would immediately turn so euphoric that they would drive the prices of financial assets sky-high—thereby creating an enormous new risk out of the absence of all the old ones. Investors should never stop trying to manage their risks. But they should never believe that they, or anyone else, can eliminate them." [5]

        "'This time is different' are said to be the four most expensive words in the English language...." [6] "[M]emories can be short, especially in the financial markets. ... People are considering deals they wouldn't have touched 12 or 18 months ago.... In a market that is hot ... they might not do as much due diligence.... That's the risk...." [7]

        "Investors usually dismiss worries about aggressive accounting when they involve a fast-growing company in an exploding sector. Instead, they should wonder why such a company would resort to aggressive accounting in the first place." [8] "Around the start of the millennium, high-flying dot-coms said their companies were worth hundreds of millions based on unusual yardsticks like how many viewers were looking at their websites. … [A]s investors learned in the dot-com bubble, equity valuations can plunge fast. … The alternative valuation metrics of that era, like 'eyeballs,' 'monthly unique visitors' and 'stickiness' looked idiotic by late 2000. …'When the downturn happens, some of those creative interpretations of valuations fall away,' [Mike Terwilliger, portfolio manager at ResourceAlts] said. 'That can get pretty ugly.'" [9] "As long as investors were willing to believe that profits were coming, it all worked—until it didn't. ... [M]ost things that are economically unsustainable, from money-losing dot-coms to subprime mortgages, eventually come to a bitter end." [10]

        What did P. T. Barnum say? "Whenever greed meets reality and giddy markets collapse, Wall Street pros usually admit that they sensed the end was coming. The warning signs were so familiar, they belatedly confess, that it was difficult to believe anyone could miss them. The chain of fools was running out.  Privately, and increasingly publicly, financial professionals warn this will end badly for the investing public. To cynics, the only questions are when, and how badly. … [A] matrix of hedge funders, private-equity dealmakers, bankers, lawyers and assorted promoters [] see the excesses building. They point to you've got-to-be-joking valuations, questionable disclosures and, most worrisome, a growing misalignment of interests. … The bad omens are all around. … SPACs, also known as blank-check companies … have a lot of wiggle room in valuing the businesses they buy. Unlike traditional IPOs, where financial results are in focus, SPACs can base entire deals on projections." [11] "[A]t a 2021 investment committee meeting of the California Public Employees' Retirement System ... [a]n external advisor warned board members that the boom in blank-check companies was a sign of froth in financial markets." [12] "The SPAC boom cost investors billions. Insiders in the companies that went public were on the other side of the trade. Executives and early investors in companies that went public via special-purpose acquisition companies sold shares … profiting before share prices collapsed. …  Companies that went public this way have lost more than $100 billion in market value. At least 12 have filed for bankruptcy and more than 100 are running low on cash…. Many executives claimed during the boom that SPAC mergers were a better way for companies to go public than traditional initial public offerings." [13] "What made SPACs so special was the 'investor presentation' included in the merger filings after the SPAC found a company to combine with.... Usually toward the tail end there would be a financial projection – often going out years. As it turns out, many (or most) of these companies' grand projections were nothing but fantasy. … [I]f that's the only way a company can go public, you have to wonder why." [14]

        "If you come to crypto because (1) you are very self-confident and (2) you don't know anything about traditional finance and don't want to find out, then you will have a lot of fun repeating and magnifying the historical errors of traditional finance." [15] "[W]e were experiencing a peak in investment absurdity. The examples then were bitcoin, dogecoin and nonfungible tokens (NFTs), as well as meme stocks, the prices of which were not tied to sober reflections about their issuers' business prospects but to internet-fueled speculation. Assets like these, which are priced in accordance with the 'greater fool' theory…. The old saw applies about how if you're looking around the poker table and can't identify the mark, it's you." [16] "The low bids come as the NFT market has slowed in recent months." [17] "Any time there is a boom cycle like this, otherwise smart investors do dumb things because they see their pals and peers piling in and worry they will be left out. Envy is a pernicious quality — and one that is all too human." [18]

        Take a look at what else emerges towards the peak of a bubble. "Over the past two years … financial firms are pile-driving their clients into assets that have no market. … Many of these other corporate offerings instead come directly from tiny issuers or through dodgy brokers and financial advisers. … The investments sometimes end up worthless, and egregious conflicts of interest are rife among those selling them. … The fatal flaw: … often you can't sell at all. … The risk of default or bankruptcy is high. Commissions and other fees can easily exceed 10%." [19] "Alternative investments—assets such as stocks and funds that don't regularly trade in public markets—are one of the biggest fads on Wall Street. Investors being pitched on them should take note: The market for Reg D investments isn't the Wild West, where some rules don't apply. It's closer to anarchy, where rules barely exist and disclosures can be utterly untrustworthy…." [20]

        "Boom times are always accompanied by fraud. As the Victorian journalist Walter Bagehot put it: 'All people are most credulous when they are most happy; and when money has been made . . . there is a happy opportunity for ingenious mendacity.' ...  Bagehot observed, loose business practices will always prevail during boom times. During such periods, the gatekeepers of the financial system—whether bankers, professional investors, accountants, rating agencies or regulators—should be extra vigilant. They are often just the opposite." [21] "It is [] about how people [m]ake decisions. … [C]ognitive shortcuts helped propel [Theranos] to a valuation of more than $9bn, before … it spirall[ed] towards oblivion. One shortcut concerned Ms. [Elizabeth] Holmes herself. … [P]eople too easily equate confidence with competence. …Seasoned executives at large companies lauded Ms. Holmes for 'owning the room', but ignored warning signs that the firm's product did not work. That may have been because of a second decision-making shortcut: many investors and executives relied heavily on the judgments of others rather than their own eyes. … But at some point due diligence has to extend to seeing a technology in action." [22] "The company's glittery board of directors and self-assured pitch by its founder encouraged investors to ignore the multiple red flags waving over Theranos. Trial evidence pointed to numerous investors who put money into Theranos despite being warned away by experts. … How many of the factors that enabled Theranos to raise hundreds of millions of dollars without a workable technology have changed? None. Investors are still looking for the next big thing, still looking for places to park their millions, still susceptible to superficially persuasive pitches by self-assured confidence schemers, still fearful of being left by the wayside as others pile in. That's human nature. The only difference is that the numbers next to the dollar signs are bigger." [23]  "[N]one of the Theranos investors, who invested more than $700 million with Holmes between late 2013 and 2015, had ever requested audited financial statements or asked whether the company even used an outside accountant to verify the financial information that was distributed. …  Such boldface-name investors ... lost their entire investments." [24] John Mills wrote in 1867: "Panics do not destroy capital; they merely reveal the extent to which it has been previously destroyed by its betrayal into hopelessly unproductive works."

        "'Prestigious companies, those that are household names, were actually more prone to engage in financial fraud, which was very surprising,' says lead author Jennifer Schwartz, a sociologist at Washington State University. 'We thought it would be companies that were struggling financially, that were nearing bankruptcy, but it was quite the opposite. It was the companies that thought they should be doing better than they were, the ones with strong growth imperatives—those were the firms that were most likely to cheat.'" [25] "Recklessness with the financial truth is often a sign of an economic bubble about to deflate—see the dot-bombs and Enron in late 2000 and the banks amid the 2007 subprime mortgage crisis. Scandals don't cause recessions, but they can help trigger one." [26] "Regulators are scrutinizing whether companies are manipulating financial results to meet Wall Street targets, as a profit-squeeze amps up pressure on executives to 'make the numbers.' … Tough economic times have historically been fertile ground for earnings management. Executives use flexibility in the accounting treatment of items such as reserves for losses, or revenue recognition, to boost reported earnings per share." [27]

        "[W]hen a company plays sneaky with one number, there's pretty good odds that they're being sneaky about other numbers too." [28] "Get ready for what will feel like an inescapable wave of corporate fraud. With financial conditions tightening, the market is primed to put pressure on corporate balance sheets, tempting executives to cheat to meet Wall Street's expectations. …. [E]xecutives [] think that by committing acts of fraud, they can obfuscate their dire financial situation. … [W]orldCom's bottom line took a hit. To make it look like it was still growing at a healthy rate, executives started pulling accounting tricks — recording expenses as investments and manipulating cash reserves…. [C]orporations commit[ting] securities fraud … may appear to experience a sudden liquidity crisis that is not really so sudden." [29] HAv2.3 recognizes the games.

        "Manipulation of earnings from Corporate America is on the rise, an ominous omen for the U.S. economy. … Unless you study accounting, you have likely never come across the M-Score…. The 'M' is for manipulation, and uses a company's financial statements to determine whether it is engaging in manipulation. Since the 1990s, the metric has been used to identify red flags at individual companies. … The probability of manipulation usually rises rapidly in the quarters before the economy tips into recession. … The new aggregate measure … shows that the collective probability of fraud across major companies is the highest in over 40 years. The M-Score is calculated from eight ratios on a company's balance sheet, all numbers that public companies report…. The theory is that their index might be catching distress in the stages when some companies are taking steps to try to cover it up. That is when conditions on the ground are beginning to deteriorate, but firms are continuing to report strong earnings. The stock market might behave like the corporate sector is still humming along when in reality, its earnings are increasingly buoyed by tricks." [30] "History confirms … that burst bubbles and accounting controversies tend to go hand in hand.    Consider past experience. Corporate bankruptcies and unraveling frauds were among the hallmarks of the 1930s, following the crash of 1929. … The root of the accounting problem … is that stock-market bubbles reward aggressive accounting, since it inflates earnings and helps push up companies' stock prices. As bubbles develop and the continued inflation of stock prices becomes paramount, conservative accountants and executives become discredited, and bending the rules becomes standard." [31] HAv2.3 calculates M-Scores and other similar indicators of financial shenanigans.

        "Investors rely on auditors to serve as watchdogs against corporate fraud. But auditors have little to gain—and much to lose—from doing a lot of barking. Although failing to detect fraud can be disastrous, auditors know that identifying genuine wrongdoing usually means considerable trouble and expense--and perhaps questions about why it wasn't spotted sooner. Conversely, a false alarm about fraud antagonizes clients, dismays supervisors and produces its own stresses. Auditors thus learn to be reluctant skeptics." [32] "Wall Street's top watchdog is warning that the market selloff and fears of a recession could encourage more companies to cook their books, and it is pressuring auditors to catch them. … After coming under fire for its role in Wirecard and other corporate failures, [Ernst & Young] two years ago told clients it was taking a number of steps to more actively look for big frauds … The firm is using artificial intelligence to parse ledgers for suspicious transactions, mining social-media posts and using forensic-accounting specialists earlier to look for potential accounting violations at high-risk companies…. … Such measures by EY and other accounting firms don't overcome the basic conflict of interest in the industry: Accounting firms are paid by the companies they audit, making it less likely they will confront bad behavior. Worries that auditors can buckle under client pressure to sign off on suspicious financial statements go back decades. In the run-up to the 2001 collapse of Enron Corp., a partner at its now-defunct auditor Arthur Andersen complained that his advice against certain accounting practices was being ignored. The partner was later removed from the Enron audit team, following complaints by an executive of the Houston-based energy company." [33]

        "The [internal auditors] had run into an inexplicable $2 billion that the company said in public disclosures had been spend on capital expenditures…. Capital costs, such as equipment, property and other major purchases, can be depreciated over long periods of time. In many cases, companies spread those costs over years. Operating costs such as salaries, benefits and rent are subtracted from income on a quarterly basis, and so they have an immediate impact on profits.  … By 2000, WorldCom had started to rely on aggressive accounting to blur the true picture of its badly sagging business. … But by 2001 it wasn't enough to keep the company afloat. … [Mr. David Myers, Worldcom's controller] admitted that he knew the accounting treatment was wrong…. He said that the entries should not have been made, but that once it had started, it was hard to stop. … [W]orldCom stunned Wall Street with an announcement that it had inflated profits by $3.8 billion…." [34]

       "[W]e are living in 'a post-truth environment.' That translates, [Jim Chanos founder of hedge fund Kynikos Associates] argues, into a mood in which investors are also willing to suspend disbelief. … 'There's a very clear link between great episodes of fraud and the financial cycle. When we've had great frauds, they’ve always been at the tail end of great financial cycles,' says Chanos…. [I]t's then easier for fraudsters to raise money, and generally they're not exposed until the cycle turns down because then people stop funding them and want their money back,' he explains. … 'People end up getting more enthralled with the story than they are with the numbers,' [Dan David, the co-founder of GeoInvesting] says. 'That's a mistake.'" [35]

       "The financial use of 'bubble' originated centuries ago to describe massive speculation that inflates market prices to the bursting point. … [T]hey are diabolically difficult to identify without the benefit of hindsight. …Financial markets, however, can easily heat up fivefold or even 10-fold and then collapse at least 50% in a flash, burning millions of speculators and sometimes charring entire economies. … When prices go up, more people buy, inflaming prices even more and attracting another rush of speculators. That lures in naive buyers who think making money is easy. But hedge funds and other institutions also chase those hot returns, fanning the flames even higher. …  Marketability, credit and speculation are necessary, but not sufficient, to start and maintain a market fire. A fourth component … call[ed] a 'spark,' is also needed. That can come from new technology, government intervention or both. … [M]ost bubbles tend to be confined to a few stocks or industries." [36] A "spark" assures some that "this time, it's different."

       "The only way to argue that stocks aren't wildly expensive is to say that something fundamental has changed about the market environment. … [I]nvestors could pay a heavy price if they turn out to be wrong. …  [S]tandard measures show valuations are at rarely-seen levels that have typically ended in tears. … [E]mbracing new paradigms can get investors into trouble." [37]

       "Bubbles are perhaps unavoidable; some people will extrapolate too far." [38] "[T]he most enthusiastic buyers in market bubbles often believe they'll stick around to capture even bigger payoffs in the distant future. Bubbles form when catchy stories and the human need for imitation and conformity turn investing into a social imperative." [39]

       "Spotting asset bubbles is hard because there is almost always a good underlying reason for what's going on. Canals, railways and the internet really were going to revolutionize the economy. The mistake with bubbles is that prices disconnect from what the new development will justify. The difficulty for those of us trying to spot bubbles is to tell how much is really justified, and how big the disconnect will become. …  As usual, the question is how high is too high. … One of the characteristics of bubbles is that hope of profit encourages exuberant optimism, and investors hand over money for projects they'd never consider in normal times. … The last boom peaked in 2007 along with the stock market, and might have been a sign of investors having a get-rich-quick mind-set. … [T]oo much money is already chasing too few good-quality deals." [40] "'These things can go further than anyone would expect because they tend to be self-reinforcing' Mr. [Chief Investment Officer of Cambria Investment Management Meb] Faber said. ... One possible sign of a bubble is a belief that negative developments are somewhat positive.[41] "[D]roves of newcomers rushed to trade stocks based on message-board rumors." [42]"Frenetic trading in stocks and options of no apparent worth has erupted anew, a classic sign of speculation that often coincides with tops in the market. … More scary is the opprobrium heaped on GameStop's detractors, who have been objects of online attacks." [43] "Most days, [Kevin Paffrath] live-streams on the platform for several hours, talking about the stock market and doling out investing advice in a rapid-fire, self-deprecating manner. … Many of these influencers have no formal training as financial advisers and no background in professional investing, leading them to pick stocks based on the whims of popular opinion or to dispense money-losing advice. … Still, the online model is entirely new, with influencers judged on the content they produce, rather than their investing track records; and they often get paid based on numbers of subscribers and viewers, rather on the investment income their advice generates for clients. …  Many influencers report that when they hype an investment, they get the page views they crave. When the message is bearish, however, viewers turn away, or worse, attack the messenger with vicious trolling. … The real danger in the social-media finance world, he says, is that younger influencers tend to believe the market only goes up." [44] "Venerable institutions … have employees combing through [] internet forum[s] … in search of trading opportunities. They turned to these sources following a period of market mayhem dominated by amateurs…." [45]

       "You can never predict when a bubble will actually burst. Some of them can continue for a remarkably long time. But when they do, they almost always do so quickly and dramatically." [46] "At one point, the most coveted Beanie Babies, which sold for about $5 in the store, were worth about $5,000." [47] "What goes up often keeps rising. That's the logic at the heart of momentum investing—a strategy that's been surging lately. ... What's more, some investing pros say we've entered an era well suited to momentum strategies—where one asset after another experiences a bubble that then bursts. ... These momentum trends in markets have more to do with the faddishness of human behavior than the fundamentals of economics and balance sheets. In essence, investors often flock to the stocks that have been going up, which tends to propel them further. Momentum ... traders don't analyze why ... stocks ... are on a winning streak recently or determine whether the stocks are expensive or cheap in theory. Momentum seekers jump on the bandwagon, intending to jump off again before the inevitable train wreck that ends the journey. With so many traders watching the same charts and seeing the same signals, these trends often become ... a self-fulfilling prophecy. ... [I]nvestors get excited because momentum beats the market on the way up—and often forget that it gets hammered more than the market on the way down." [48] "What a week for crypto enthusiasts! …Much of Bitcoin's rise may just be driven by FOMO [an acronym for 'fear of missing out']. … A survey by the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority found that 76% of young people investing in high-risk products felt a sense of competitiveness with friends, family and other acquaintances, making the cryptocurrency look more like a machine for YOLO [an acronym for 'you only live once.' It is a call to live life to its fullest extent, even embracing behavior which carries inherent risk] trades rather than a reliable store of value. [49] "Cryptocurrency- related job postings in the U.S. surged 395% between 2020 and 2021 … dramatically outpac[ing] the wider tech industry…. The most common crypto job postings were blockchain developer and engineer…. This jobs boom comes as investments are pouring into the industry. Venture capitalists invested a record $30 billion in crypto companies in 2021…. And in another sign of the times, Los Angeles has renamed its iconic Staples Center the Crypto.com Arena." [50] "[C]ryptocurrencies, with their huge price fluctuations seemingly unrelated to fundamentals, are about as risky as an asset class can get. … Maybe the rising valuation (although not use) of Bitcoin and its rivals represents something more than a bubble, in which people buy an asset simply because other people have made money off that asset in the past." [51] "There is something unseemly … about the famous and fabulously wealthy urging crypto on their fans. Cryptocurrencies, after all, are in many cases not so much currencies as speculative thingamabobs - digital tokens whose value is predicated largely on the idea that someone will take them off your hands at a higher price than it cost you to acquire them. … The cryptocurrency industry's marketing efforts are focused on young people, especially young men. … [T]hey amount to a macho taunt: If you're a real man, you'll buy crypto. …  [C]ulture has taken a sinister turn: that we've sanctioned an economy in which tech start-ups compete, in broad daylight to lure the vulnerable with get-rich-quick schemes." [52]  

          "When a public company is in dire financial straits – with too much debt, not enough cash and financial metrics going the wrong direction – there's usually an effort to get the banks or other lenders and/or big investors to figure out a way to work things out. If things are really bad, that typically involves issuing new debt to replace the old debt… and doing such things as granting waivers on debt covenants to give the company one last chance to avoid having to wear the scarlet 'B'. … [T]hese stocks are almost always of companies behind a popular brand, product or concept or former high-flyer… the very kind of companies that are like magnets to the 'meme' stock crowd. … [A] key attraction is the ability to squeeze heavily shorted stocks higher. That means buying them for no other reason of forcing short sellers to cover at higher prices, creating a self-fulfilling momentum driven feeding frenzy. … But for most investors, it's the same old 'fear of missing out' (FOMO) trap… that if they don’t get in they'll miss out on the next big home run, which for some reason always happens to involve a company on the verge of going out of business. … None of that really matters because these investors – almost naively – are playing straight into the hands of investment bankers behind this ingenious strategy…. [W]hat goes up on hot air, plunges when it's gone…." [53]

          "In a market bubble, it's easy to confuse opportunity for genius. … [I]t's no surprise that some of the loudest voices from the market's precipitous rise have gone silent. … Let their silence be a lesson. When financial markets are minting not just money but celebrities, it's time to be more than skeptical. It's time to prepare for the kind of disaster that makes once great stock pickers look like pikers. … The most popular notion of our last rally was a bet that economic conditions would remain favorable to companies that didn't make money — that these firms could grow off debt and investment capital alone. … The market seemed so friendly that influencers realized they could get average investors in on this action too. … When people are making money in the market on some new fad or asset, it can be hard to not jump on board. But if that buzzy money-making investment sounds too good to be true, it probably is. And if it sounds too stupid to be true, it's probably even stupider than you think. … It's really never a good sign when you see celebrities hanging around the stock market, and during the bubble they were everywhere…. Their main message is that it's not hard to make money — in fact, you'll miss out if you don't get involved. It is a siren song for gullible people. Good information about the stock market does not come easy, and Gordon Gekko was right to say that if you want a friend on Wall Street, you should buy a dog. If anyone tries to make you feel like you're just as smart as the professionals, they're trying to take your money." [54]

       "[T]he bubble pops when everybody has concluded that what has gone on with prices make sense. ... [T]here isn't much of a step between believing that a bubble will continue and believing that not participating in the bubble will amount to lost opportunity." [55] "A bubble occurs when exaggerated expectations of future price increases generate unusual demand either by people who fear being price out of the market or by investors hoping to make a lot of money fast. A bubble is a self-fulfilling prophecy for a while, as successive rounds of buyers push prices higher and higher. But the willingness to continue to pay higher and higher prices is fragile: It will end whenever buyers perceive that prices are no longer going up. Hence, bubbles carry the seeds of their own destruction. Only time is needed for the bubbles to end." [56] "[O]nce a crisis of confidence gets going, it can be impossible to control. ... [I]t's easy to be wise after the event, whereas wisdom before the event is apparently impossible. ... [F]inancial confidence is always more fragile than it looks, and [] worst-case scenarios have an infuriating habit of coming true." [57]

        Whether fake news or not, this article has to signal the top of an overheated financial market. "A reality TV star who launched a gassy venture peddling her fancy flatulence to strangers Stephanie Matto, 31, blew away people on social media when she recently announced that she makes more than $50,000 a week selling her farts. … But after making $200,000 in sales, the influencer has announced her retirement when she passed one too many and got the wind knocked out of her…. Matto was rushed to a hospital with chest pains she feared were symptoms of a heart attack…. After undergoing a battery of tests, including blood work and an EKG, Matto was told that her pain was the result of her steady diet of gas-inducing beans and eggs. … The newly retired fart peddler said she plans to donate a portion of her income to charity that supports gastric disorders." [58]

        "When things start to go wrong, they get worse than anyone ever imagined they could. ... Regulators should ask the dozen or so top financial services firms ... what their most recent crop of top business school hires are working on—not just their general assignments but precisely what they're doing. ...  [C]rises follow the talent with a lag of about three years." [59] "Several top schools have added or rushing to add classes about Bitcoin and the record-keeping technology that it introduced, know as the blockchain." [60] "Baruch [College's master's financial engineering program] teaches students skills like data science and financial modeling. … Funds have been recruiting the kind of people who can make investment decisions using code, big data and machine learning. Two of the Baruch graduates working at hedge funds reported a compensation of $1 million or more." [61] If the reports are true and if those reporting believe in their continuing abilities to generate humongous profits, they could set up their own shops and not answer to and share with others. 

         "So what does all this mean to us as investors? In a speculative environment, just about the only ones who profit are short-term traders. ... If you want to bail out, you have to do so on the way up and not worry about missing the peak." [62]  However, learning and doing financial statement analysis is not easy, but the effort is worth it—it keeps your investment decisions rational.

        The Market Cycle: Down 

        "So what precipitates a crash? It's not just priceit's speculation, volatility, stock issuance, accelerated price increases and a disproportionate rise in prices among newer firms." [63] "[A] series of manias [] have gripped the financial world. For months, professional and everyday investors have pushed up the prices of stocks and real estate. Now the frenzy has spilled over into the riskiest—and in some cases, wackiest—assets, including digital ephemera and media, cryptocurrencies, collectibles like trading cards and even sneakers.  So many got creative and … took on more risk.  That has now led to mini-bubbles…. [S]tocks … became even more expensive. That was when more people started investing in nontraditional assets. … Predicting when and how the party will end is anyone's guess. … [A] Roaring Twenties-style era of prosperity … decade ended in a devastating crash, [but] the euphoria lasted years." [64]

        "[M]any who saw the bubble inflating [Panic of 1837] warned about it bursting, including journalists.... People will over-lend and over-borrow until the day of reckoning. ... It's just the way we are." [65]

        "'When people are stressed their reason is hampered, so they look at what other people are doing. … [I]t leads you to engage in the same behavior,' [Sander van der Linden, an assistant professor of social psychology at Cambridge University] said." [66]



[1] WSJ, 1/3/09, "Why We Keep Falling for Financial Scams"

[2] WSJ, 7/14/18, "Don't Get Too Excited by the Earnings 'Surprise' Party"

[3] WSJ, 8/5/20, "Former Trustify CEO's Indictment Highlights Due Diligence Dilemma; CEO misstated revenue, sent fake email about investments, indictment alleges"

[4] CNBC.com, 1/14/22, "American Greed: Founders get blamed for start-up scandals, but where were investors?"

[5] WSJ, 3/28/20, "We Can't Prevent Market Panics. We Can Control How We React. The dangers lurking in the market can be hidden or delayed, but never eliminated. For investors, slumps are a chance for introspection–and, sometimes, new opportunity."

[6] WSJ, 1/20/21, "Stocks Could Plunge Even if the Economy Booms...."

[7] Bloomberg, 12/17/18, "Investors Are Piling Into Loans That Banks Have Avoided Since the Crash"

[8] WSJ, 12/14/05, "Cerner's Growth Has Been Healthy, But Its Accounting Could Be Ailing"

[9] Bloomberg, 8/10/18, "Credit Market's 'Eyeball Valuations' Raise Investors' Eyebrows"

[10] NYT, 9/1/18, "The Next Financial Crisis Lurks Underground"

[11] Bloomberg, 3/8/21,"'Hey, Hey, Money Maker': Inside the $156 Billion SPAC Bubble"

[12] Bloomberg, 1/3/23, "Investing Novices Are Calling the Shots for $4 Trillion at US Pensions"

[13] WSJ, 5/30/23, "Company Insiders Made Billions Before SPAC Bust; Executives and early investors sold shares worth $22 billion"

[14] On The Street, 8/15/23, "SPACs – The Implosion Continues. And... Where's the SEC?"

[15] Bloomberg-Money Stuff,  9/21/22, "Crypto investing philosophy"

[16] Los Angeles Times [LAT], 12/26/21, "For the U.S., a landmark year for stupidity"

[17] WSJ, 4/15/22, "Jack Dorsey Tweet NFT Once Sold for $2.9 Million, Now Might Fetch Under $14,000...."

[18] NYT, 11/14/22, "What to make of FTX and SBF?"

[19] WSJ, 1/13/23, "An Iowa Farmer Tried to Dodge Stock-Market Turmoil. It Cost Him $900,000…."

[20] WSJ, 4/7/23, "Digging Into a $344 Billion Investing Mystery; Preposterous claims in private investment offerings illustrate an important point about red-hot 'Reg D' securities: No one is checking to see if the details in these filings are even remotely true"

[21] WSJ, 4/17/09, "A Fortune Up in Smoke"

[22] Economist, 12/11/21, "The shortcuts to Theranos"

[23] LAT, 1/4/22, "Theranos verdict won't stop foolish investors"

[24] MarketWatch, 10/20/18, "The last days of Theranos — the financials were as over hyped as the blood tests"

[25] FastCompany, 2/8/21, "Cheating in plain sight: Big, well-known companies are more likely to commit financial fraud"

[26] Fortune, 1/1/17, "The Ugly Unethical Underside of Silicon Valley"

[27] WSJ, 3/10/23, "SEC Is Focusing on Earnings Manipulation by Companies; Watchdog scrutinizes financial reports to sniff out accounting Tricks"

[28] Footnoted.org, 4/24/09, "Pretty sneaky at FTI....")

[29] Business Insider, 1/31/23, "The Great Fraud Reckoning")

[30] WSJ, 3/24/23, "Accounting-Fraud Indicator Signals Coming Economic Trouble; A tool to identify corporate earnings manipulation finds the most risk in over 40 years"

[31] WSJ, 2/22/02, "Burst Bubbles Often Expose Cooked Books And Trigger SEC Probes, Bankruptcy Filings"

[32] WSJ, 4/13/17, "Can a Few Words Help Auditors Detect Fraud? …"

[33] WSJ, 11/3/23, "SEC Accountant Warns of Heightened Fraud Risk…."

[34] WSJ, 10/30/02, "Uncooking the Books: How Three Unlikely Sleuths Discovered Fraud at WorldCom --- Company's Own Employees Sniffed Out Cryptic Clues And Followed Hunches…."

[35] Institutional Investor, 9/17/18, "How Jim Chanos Uses Cynicism, Chutzpah—and a Secret Twitter Account—to Take on Markets"

[36] WSJ, 11/20/20, "A Stock Market Bubble? It's More Like a Fire; Wild market speculation can feel like an out-of-control blaze: The more it expands and the hotter it gets, the more havoc it can wreak"

[37] WSJ, 12/24/20, "Has the Fed Rewritten the Laws of Investing? Things probably aren't different this time with market valuations so high, but if they are then that still might not be so good."

[38] Economist, 11/12/20, "Value investing is struggling to remain relevant"

[39] WSJ, 8/7/20, "Do You Know the Difference Between Being Rich and Being Wealthy?"

[40] WSJ, 10/19/20, "Wall Street's Hottest Financing Tool Makes Me Worry About the Market; Shaq, Playboy and Nikola are all on the blank-check bandwagon, part of a boom in SPACs that is unsettling"

[41] NYT, 1/14/21, "A Rally That Won't Stop or a Bubble About to Pop"

[42] WSJ, 1/24/21," If It Looks Like a Bubble and Swims Like a Bubble...."

[43] Barron's, 6/22/21, "GameStop Stock Is Just the Latest Sign of a Speculative Frenzy"

[44] WSJ, 8/27/21, "The Social-Media Stars Who Move Markets…."

[45] WSJ, 8/27/21, "Wall Street Is Looking to Reddit for Investment Advice; Deep-pocketed banks and hedge funds now take their cues from armies of Main Street traders"

[46] WSJ, 9/14/09, "Burned by Beanie Babies and Other Bubbles"

[47] WSJ, 2/6/21, "Is GameStop a Bubble? History's Spectacular Crashes, From Tulips to Beanie Babies. What goes up must come down. Bubbles have boosted—and burned—investors for centuries."

[48] WSJ, 5/3/10, "Maybe the Rearview Mirror is Right"

[49] Bloomberg Opinion, 10/24/21, "Today"

[50] Axios, 1/14/22, "Crypto jobs boom"

[51] NYT, 1/28/22, "How Crypto Became the New Subprime"

[52] NYT, 2/2/22, "Why Is Matt Damon Shilling for Crypto?"

[53] Substack, 8/13/23, "Playing Investors for Fools"

[54] Business Insider, 10/18/22, "The stock market crash is exposing Wall Street's biggest Charlatans"

[55] WSJ, 5/24/05, "Betting Against the House"

[56] WSJ Opinion, 8/24/04, "Mi Casa Es Su Housing Bubble"

[57] Bloomberg, 8/31/18, "Don't Be Baffled by Argentina's Crisis - What's hard to imagine in good times can quickly become inevitable"

[58] New York Post, 1/5/22, "'90 Day Fiancé' star retires from selling farts after heart attack Scare"

[59] Money, Greed, and Risk [1999] by Charles R. Morris

[60] NYT, 2/8/18, "Cryptocurrencies Come to Campus"

[61] WSJ, 12/30/19, "In Battle to Recruit New Quants, Hedge Funds Outpay Banks...."

[62] WSJ, 8/26/09, "Family Money: How I Got Burned by Beanie Babies"

[63] TheStreet.com, 4/17/17, "Here's How to Spot a Market Bubble"

[64] NYT, 3/13/21, "From Crypto Art to Trading Cards, Investment Manias Abound"

[65] WSJ, 4/18/19, "Easy Money, Bad Decisions"

[66] CNBC, 5/11/20, "Here's why people are panic buying and stockpiling toilet paper to cope with coronavirus fears"

       The Opportunity        

        "[A] crisis is not just a bad situation. ... The Chinese have a similar concept: The characters for crisis (危机) combine parts of those for danger () and opportunity (机会). A crisis is a point when people have to make rapid choices under extreme pressure.... A crisis is certainly a test of character. It can be scary. ... Students of crises are fond of dividing them into phases. For example, Charles Kindleberger's 'Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises' identifies five phases of a financial crisis: an exogenous, normally positive, shock to the system; a bubble in which people exaggerate the benefits of that shock; distress when some investors realize that the game cannot last; the crash; and finally a depression. ... The bubble is typically characterized by mania and denial. Things are going well—or, at least, appear to be. Feedback loops end up magnifying confidence. ... In finance, leverage plays a big part. ... Manic individuals ... end up taking excessive risks.... But before that, there is denial. People do not wish to recognize that there is a fundamental sickness in a system, especially when they are doing so well. ... Market participants had such a strong interest in keeping the game going that they turned a blind eye to the unsustainable buildup of leverage. ... It is hard to recognize a sickness, given that there is usually some ideology that explains away the mania as a new normal. The few naysayers can be ridiculed by those who benefit from the continuation of the status quo. ... The crash, by contrast, is characterized by panic and scapegoating. People fear that the system could collapse. Negative feedback loops are in operation: The loss of confidence breeds further losses in confidence. ... Events move extremely fast, and decisions have to be made rapidly. ... [¶] In this phase, no one denies that there is a problem. But there is often no agreement over what has gone wrong. Protagonists are reluctant to accept their share of the responsibility but instead seek to blame others. Such scapegoating, though, prevents people from reforming a system fundamentally so that similar crises do not recur. Crises will always be a feature of life." [1]

        "What does it mean when investment professionals say, 'Buy the panic'? . . . Buying stocks during a market panic sounds easy to do when you look at history. Still, it's much harder in practice. ... If investors wait for the market to rally again before investing, then they are giving up on potential profits. But if they act too early when making stock purchases, then they may incur even more losses. Investors can conquer that problem by making measured purchases depending on how confident they are about where the market is moving. ... However, the largest hurdle when investing during a panic is that the best time to do so is when you will likely be least willing…. It's the moment of maximum fear, which will also coincide with the peak in panic." [2]

        "True contrarians only buy stock when it makes them feel physically sick. ... Even if you successfully picked the bottom, would you have held ... ? ... But even with perfect hindsight there were plenty of great reasons to sell along the way. ... [W]ould you be able to ignore the temptation to lock in profit?" [3] "[I]t's easy to say you'd buy more stocks if the market fell 10%, 20% or more. In a real market crash, it's a lot harder to step up and buy when every stock price is turning blood-red, pundits are shrieking about Armageddon and your family is begging you not to throw more money into the flames. Then risk is no longer a notion; it's an emotion. … The best guide to whether you will dump stocks in the next financial crisis is whether you did in the last one. If you weren't investing in 2008-09, look back at the fourth quarter of 2018, when stocks lost nearly 20%." [4] "In a severe bear market, you're often trading with someone who has to get out or go broke so you may have the advantage."  [5]

        "It's the time to buy for investors able to stomach the market's swoons. … Mom-and-pop investors have largely been sitting out—a sign that the rally doesn't reflect widespread optimism. … Paradoxically, some of the most skeptical investors—short-sellers, who make their money betting that shares will fall—have contributed to the rally. Short-sellers borrow shares and immediately sell them in the hope that they can buy them back later at a lower price and pocket the difference. But when the market goes against them and share prices rise, short-sellers can face disastrous losses if they don't quickly buy back the shares and return them to their lender. Retail shares have bounced back in April, most likely driven by short-sellers rushing to cover their bets. Nordstrom and Macy's—both up more than 20 percent this month—were top targets of short-sellers in recent weeks, according to S3 Partners, which tracks the activity of short-selling. … And don't underestimate the fear of missing out. As shares rise, professional money managers feel pressure to buy stocks to protect their reputations. … Concerns over so-called career risk can overwhelm fundamental analysis of stocks and bonds, forcing a headlong rush into markets even if a buyer doubts the rally can last." [6]

        "Warren Buffett famously said he tries to be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.  For some money managers, that isn't just clever advice—it is an entire investing strategy. The idea of embracing out-of-favor stocks, sometimes called contrarian investing, isn't new. But the approach requires a strong stomach in the best markets, let alone during historic downturns." [7] "[C]ontrarian thinking is only helpful at extraordinary inflection points in the market.... Most people think that contrarian investing means doing the opposite of what others are doing. But going against the crowd is a surefire way of getting trampled. The majority of investors are usually right. True contrarians look for points of maximum exuberance or despair, which is when the majority is generally wrong. ... The way you can tell most investors who go against the herd is from the hoof marks on their backs." [8] "The trick for contrarians … [is] to avoid being contrary all the time. … At turning points … the herd [i]s nearly always wrong. … [L]ook[] for 'crescendos of euphoria and pessimism'…. Opportunities ar[i]se when 'something has changed for the better but the market has not yet recognized it' … and when 'nothing has changed but the market has given too much emphasis to the negatives.' … 'A lawyer is trained to assemble as many of the available facts as possible before making a decision … whereas a portfolio manager can gain a competitive edge if he is able to make a sound decision before all of the pieces of the jigsaw puzzle are in place.'" [9]

        "Meanwhile, company insiders appear to be buying. According to AlphaSense, a data platform, regulatory filings announcing purchases by executives and directors have jumped in recent weeks. … • At companies with market caps of at least $1 billion, there have been 1,305 filings for stock purchases so far this month, compared with just 113 during the same period last year. Executives may think the bear market has hit their shares too hard, or that purchases with their own money serve as a sign of commitment during tough times — or a bit of both. [10]

        "Everyone thinks they're a genius in a bull market, but it's only when prices head south that some people really stand out from the crowd. ... Knowing how to handle fearful times like these offer the best opportunity to avoid lagging behind the market. … Investor psychology in a major bear market is a mirror image of what it was the past few years: The more false alarms there were on the way up, the likelier investors were to embrace risk, viewing dips as buying opportunities. On the way down, so-called suckers' rallies—and the technical bull market we reached on Thursday may well have been one—get our hopes up and then crush them. By the time a really prolonged bear market is about to end, investors who haven't sold in disgust probably have a lower percentage of their net worth in stocks than at the outset. That is one of the costliest mistakes investors make. A surprising share of a new bull market's returns pile up in its very early stages when people are most fearful. … Making lemonade out of the market's lemons sounds tempting, but it isn't easy. The old saw goes that the stock market is the only one where people run away when there's a sale. Beforehand they crowd in when the wares are most expensive because they see everyone else getting rich." [11]

        Value Investing

        "[]During economic down cycles when everyone's more pessimistic, investors turn to deep-value stocks, meaning stocks with relatively low valuations but with good cash flows and dividend payouts… [] … The debate between value investors and growth investors goes back at least a century, and appears to be explained in part by genetic predispositions. Some investors prefer the safety of companies that have reliable earnings, plenty of cash and stable business models; others get excited about finding tomorrow's success stories today. The risk for investors who favor cheap stocks is 'the value trap,' a term for stocks that look too cheap to ignore—but stay that way even after you buy them." [12]

        "Most investors 'almost reflexively described themselves as value investors....' ... No sane person wants to overpay for stocks." [13] "The cardinal distinction between a share's price and its value goes back to Benjamin Graham, the father of value investing. Price is a creature of the market's mood, he wrote. In booms, it is set by the greediest buyer; in busts by the most fearful seller. A stock's value, in contrast, is enduring. It is anchored by the worth of a firm's assets. The enterprising investor can profit from finding stocks that sell for much less than their value, said Graham. There have since been countless studies showing that value stocks do better than 'growth' stocks, their antithesis, over the long haul. … Frumpy value stock gets left behind—until sanity returns. … This agonizing is not for most people, says James Montier, of GMO, a fund-management firm: 'They don't want to be wrong for as long as it takes.' Value investors hope to be rewarded for being so out of step with everyone else for so much of the time. But a select few can endure—and even enjoy—it." [14]

        "Prof. Eugene Fama, who won an economics Nobel Prize, argued that value stocks outperformed because they were riskier, and the efficient stock market rewards higher risk in the long run. A different view holds that investor behavior is the answer: investors shun bad companies more than they should, leaving them artificially cheap. Those with the gumption to buy will eventually be rewarded when others recognize that their prospects are merely bad, not awful." [15]

        "Historically, value-style investing has performed in fits and starts—typically lagging behind growth for extended periods but ultimately winning the race, at least for investors who don't drop out before the finish line. … Value investing isn't as simple as finding great companies trading at attractive prices. There are many theories for why value has underperformed. The easiest one to grasp: Legitimate bargains abound early in a market cycle, but eventually value stocks get picked over. If something is cheap in the later stages of a bull market, it's usually for good reason." [16] "Small-cap stocks ... typically rise ahead of a wider market rally and fall ahead of a broader market capitulation. ... Contrarian investors see a buying opportunity in the recent rout." [17]

 

        "[F]ewer investors analyze one value stock at a time by hand. Often, they use computers to buy the value 'factor' en masse, capturing cheapness as a common attribute across hundreds of stocks at once. That has lower costs for investors. But it has also driven up prices, reducing the supply of bargains among value stocks...." [18]

         "[T]he higher long-run return from investing in cheaper stocks is a righteous form of payback for the pain of sitting around for years watching all those growth stocks with piddling profits go straight up. If you do not have a vast reservoir of patience and you can't ignore the better short-term fortune of other investors, you won't be able to stomach value investing long enough to benefit from it." [19]

         Sometimes, a "value" fund is wolf in sheep's clothing. "Zoom was priced at 690 times the company's earnings over the past 12 months and 203 times what analysts are guessing it will earn in the next 12. Among the institutional buyers were three dozen 'value investors,' whose mission is to find the cheapest stocks. … Those are tiny stakes. But that might be the point. …  Small bets on scorching-hot stocks make sense for many fund managers. If they bet wrong, their returns won't suffer much. If they bet right, the payoff on even tiny bets, can add significantly to a fund's overall return." [20] "In college, Benjamin Stein and Zachary Sternberg devoured Warren Buffett's annual letters, embracing his value-driven approach to investing. This guided the undergrads when they started a hedge fund…. Around 2017, Stein and Sternberg began to change tack, going on to place what would become chunky wagers on highflying growth stocks and lengthening how long they were willing to wait for those companies to generate profits. The shift worked—for a while. … The New York hedge fund lost about two-thirds of its clients' money in 2022…. But in markets, venturing afield is often risky. … In college … Sternberg studied accounting. … The pair later vowed to return to prioritizing companies that were consistently profitable and carried little debt." (WSJ, 12/20/23, "A Wunderkind Hedge Fund Strayed Beyond Value Investing….")



[1] NYT, 10/7/12, "The Dangers and Opportunities in a Crisis"

[2] WSJ, 4/6/20, "What Is 'Buy the Panic'? Buying stocks when others are selling is a proven approach—but sometimes it takes nerve"

[3] WSJ, 3/8/19, "It's Hard to Buy at the Bottom and Hang On"

[4] WSJ, 9/6/19, "Knowing If You Can Stomach the Next Big Market Swing…."

[5] WSJ, 9/4/21, "What You've Lost in This Bull Market; Investors who no longer fear their bets could explode are seeking out risks they don't have to take"

[6] NYT, 4/8/20, "A Rush to Stocks, Driven by Bargains and Bravery"

[7] WSJ, 5/12/09, "Contrarian Patience Pays Off—Finally"

[8] USA Today, 4/16/10, "Contrarian investing doesn't mean 'always do the opposite'"

[9] WSJ, 9/26/20, "Contrarian Money Manager Didn't Always Bet Against Crowd; Leo Dworsky, who ran Fidelity's Contrafund, looked for 'crescendos of euphoria and pessimism'"

[10] NYT, 3/20/20, "Who's buying, who's selling"

[11] WSJ, 3/27/20, "How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bear Market; A surprising share of a new bull market's returns pile up in its very early stages, when the average investor is at their most fearful"

[12] WSJ, 8/30/23, "Chinese Stocks Are in a Slump—and Value Investors Are Excited…."

[13] Economist, 11/12/20, "Value investing is struggling to remain relevant"

[14] Economist, 10/25/18, "The agony of the value investor—A  contrarian strategy fares badly much of the time"

[15] WSJ, 6/9/20, "Undervalued Stocks Soared, but Not Because They're Undervalued; The furious rally in cheap-or 'value' stocks gives us reason to exhume an ancient argument about how investors perceive stocks"

[16] Barron's, 4/5/19, "Value Investing Will Beat Growth Again—but Maybe Not for Years to Come"

[17] WSJ, 7/23/19, "Small Company Shares Fall Behind in Sign of Economic Worry...."

[18] WSJ, 5/10/19, "What Warren Buffet's Teacher Would Make of Today's Market; Value stocks haven't performed well for a long time. But Ben Graham's lessons still matter."

[19] WSJ, 4/27/18, "Value Should Do Better. But When Is Anybody's Guess"

[20] WSJ, 10/16/20, "Look Who's Really Chasing Hot Stocks Like Zoom; Professional investors are blaming everyone else for the meteoric rise of speculative stocks—but they're part of the problem themselves"

The need to "do" complex

 

 

         Persons "who do independent credit analysis usually do it to find undervalued instruments that represent investment opportunities...." [1]

 

         "4. Wall Street analysts don't 'do' complex. Isn't that what securities analysts are for, you might ask?  Silly reader . . . analysis is for kids! Literally. At most large Wall Street firms, the tedious job of constructing financial models and answering client accounting queries is handled by the junior analyst on the team. It still shocks me today that when meeting with a team of 'sell-side' Wall Street analysts from a firm to discuss a particular company, the senior analyst invariably concedes the answer to a complex financial question to a junior analyst working for him. ... Senior analysts still spend most of their time on the road making client presentations. That is, of course, if they aren't playing golf with the CEO or organizing the menu at the next investor conference in Las Vegas. The recent attempts by certain companies to discourage hard-hitting independent research will only serve to maintain the chasm between those that 'do the numbers' and those with, hopefully, the experience to know what the numbers mean." [2]

 

         "[T]he lessons [Herb Greenberg] have learned can be boiled down to five that are remarkably obvious and simple but are still often ignored in the heat of battle: Lesson No. 1: The numbers don't lie. ... That is why some ... analysts don't like to talk to companies. They want to avoid the spin or the face-to-face meeting that can create a psychological connection that may skew what otherwise would be black-and-white analysis. ... Lesson No. 2: Quality, not quantity. Ignore the 'beat the Street' headlines on earnings. It is what goes into the earnings that counts. ...[T]he real story is often on the balance sheet. And let's not forget the cash-flow statement. ... The more complex and convoluted the financial statements get, especially for businesses that aren't overly complicated, the more reason to worry. Lesson No. 3: GAAP isn't the same as a Good Housekeeping seal. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ... include plenty of gray areas that give management enough rope to hang themselves, if they so please. GAAP, after all, is subject to interpretation, and some managers are more conservative than others. ... Lesson No. 4: Don't confuse stocks and companies. They sometimes go in opposite directions. Stocks sometimes really do lie. Sometimes they are pushed artificially higher by a rotation by investors from one industry group to another... (or) short squeezes.... [S]ometimes they lie because of momentum. Momentum can take stocks to infinity and beyond, but ... reverse momentum ... tends to kick in when you least expect." [3]

 

         "Outright fraud aside, if securities analysts rely solely on 'the number' (a.k.a. earnings per share), and a cursory glance at the old annual report to make their decisions, they deserve to get burned. Abraham Briloff, professor emeritus of accounting at Baruch College in the City University of New York and the remaining conscience of the public accountancy world, once wisely said, 'Corporate financial statements are like bikinis ... what they show is very interesting; but what they hide is vital.'  You would think that given the historical reputation of Wall Street as a locker room with pinstripes, this statement alone would be enough to induce thousands of hard-working professionals to tirelessly dig deeply into financial statements. But over the latter part of the 20th century, the investment management 'industry' has de-emphasized traditional securities analysis in favor of portfolio analysis, primarily for two reasons. The first is the hegemony of Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT), which … shifts emphasis away from individual security analysis to the analysis of the portfolio as a whole. … The second reason why securities analysis has been de-emphasized has been the growth in the sheer asset size of the investment management industry. Peter Lynch aside, very, very few people can claim competence in managing tens of billions of dollars in portfolios composed of hundreds of stocks. It is simply impossible for even the best and the brightest to engage in reasonably deep fundamental analysis on a 300-stock portfolio. ... What has taken the place of detailed fundamental analysis over the years is the wholesale adoption of earnings per share as the sole basis for securities analysis.Intelligent and constructive securities analysis has always been the painstaking construction of a mosaic of factors…. The apparent solution to our seemingly collective inability to 'get it,' is to call for more disclosure in financial statements. What is ironic is that if many investors have gotten themselves into a financial mess because they never bothered to carefully read financial statements, then I can almost certainly say that they are not going to read the colossal piles of paper being thrown at them now. … Crooks and frauds aside, we have generally gotten enough from GAAP disclosure to do our work. If we truly shake our heads and can't make heads or tails of a complicated set of statements, we pass and move on." [4]

 

        "Howard M. Schilit, an accounting expert who runs the Center for Financial Research and Analysis, an independent research firm, scoffed at the excuse that analysts could not have detected problems at Enron. 'Everybody is saying, "they hid from us," he said, but beginning in March 2000, he added, there were a string of warning signs in Enron's public securities filings. The problem, Mr. Schilit said, is that analysts who question the value of a popular company are branded as controversial. 'If you want to move up the hierarchy of the Wall Street establishment, you don't rock the boat,' he said." [5] "John C. Hueston, a well-regarded—and aggressive—prosecutor from Southern California … advocated charging Mr. [Kenneth] Lay with making false statements….  [Hueston] interviewed securities analysts, seeking to understand what Mr. Lay had conveyed to the marketplace. He was shocked to find that most of them had not bothered to look closely at Enron's securities filings and were taking Enron's statements 'virtually at face value.'" [6] "Securities Analysts' Recommendations: Based on available historical securities analyst information we were able to identify, as of October 18, 2001, 15 firms rated Enron a buy—12 of the 15 considered the stock a strong buy. Even as late as November 8, 2001, the date of Enron's disclosure that nearly 5 years of earnings would have to be recalculated, although most firms downgraded their ratings, 11 of 15 continued to recommend buying the stock, 3 recommended holding, and only 1 recommended selling. In November 2001, one firm upgraded its recommendation from sell to hold." [7] "Beginning in January 2001, we spoke with a number of analysts at various Wall Street firms to discuss Enron and its valuation. We were struck by how many of them conceded that there was no way to analyze Enron, but that investing in Enron was instead a 'trust me' story. One analyst, while admitting that Enron was a 'black box' regarding profits, said that, as long as Enron delivered, who was he to argue." [8]

 

        "An American writer ... caught the likely cause of the bean counters' blindness to looming danger ... 'It is difficult to get a man to understand something,' wrote Upton Sinclair, 'when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.'" [9] "The history of corporate malfeasance is consistent over the centuries: A few people at the top do bad things and hide them from everyone but a tiny group of confidants. You can work at a company—even be a senior executive—and remain as deeply in the dark as any outsider." [10]

 

        "Mr. [Sam E.] Antar (former chief financial officer of Crazy Eddie and former CPA, who stayed out of jail by turning on several others, including his cousin, Eddie Antar, who was Crazy Eddie's co-founder) says investors should do a better job 'studying' financial reports, especially the footnotes and 'risk factor' sections. 'Notice that I used the word "'study'" and not "'read'" since all information is not meant to be read like a novel, but meant to be analyzed like a project.' He adds: 'Criminals are scared of skeptics and cynics,' he says. 'We are petrified when you verify our representations.' Did he ever have remorse? 'Never ... We simply did not care about any one of our victims. We simply committed crime because we could. 'As criminals we built false walls of integrity around us,' he adds. 'We walked old ladies across the street. We built wings to hospitals. We gave huge amounts of money to charity. We wanted you to trust us. 'Simply said ... if you want to be an investor, you cannot accept information at face value. 'Unexamined acceptance' is the greatest cause of investor losses.'" [11]

         "When Sam Antar was cooking the books for his company, he used a number of complicated accounting tricks to dupe auditors. But some tactics were simple. 'These auditors from the Big Four accounting firms are usually single kids just a few years out of school. What do kids in their 20s think about all the time? Sex,' said Antar, who was at the center of a multi-million dollar fraud 20 years ago. So Antar would pair 'cute hot female' employees with male auditors as part of his distraction strategy. 'In effect, I was a fraudster, matchmaker and pimp,' said Antar....  Another tactic: Delay. 'They would come in here with maybe six weeks to go through the books ... my goal would be to leave them 80 percent of the work for the last week, so they're rushed to finish.' ... One of the best ways to detect fraud in financial statements is to read only the footnotes, and compare how they have changed over time. 'Look for subtle differences, and that is where they will hide the fraud,' said Antar. 'That's what I did.'" [12]

        "[Thornton O]'Glove … eschewed meetings with corporate executives for in-depth analysis of financial results. 'I stay away from the corporate suite," he said in an interview several years ago. 'There you only hear the siren song to cover up downtrends in earnings, losses of markets or overloads of debt.' And so it was that Mr. O'Glove had never met, much less been charmed by, the fast-talking chief of Crazy Eddie. ... Mr. O'Glove is generally credited with being the first to sense trouble at Crazy Eddie." [13]

         "The basic cultural fact is that short sellers are mean pessimists while corporate chief executive officers are nice optimists. If you are a short seller you say mean things about a company and try to make lots of innocent mom-and-pop investors poorer. If you are a CEO you say nice things about your company and try to make lots of nice mom-and-pop investors richer. … [T]hey have different roles and different incentives and you try to evaluate their arguments on the merits rather than on an ad hominem basis." [14] "Traditional short sellers see themselves as financial detectives, sniffing out corporate wrongdoing or inflated stock prices, while aiming to make a profit." [15] "[S]hort sellers are not especially sympathetic characters. After all, they benefit from the decline in value of other people's investments. But in complex markets, short sellers are akin to investigative journalists, looking for the scoop of finding an overvalued company or industry. Also like journalists, short sellers aren't always popular with corporate management or regulators. Forensic accounting experts at hedge funds have performed the hat trick of being the first to signal, through short selling, troubles at Tyco, Enron and now Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and banks." [16] "It's unsurprising that short-sellers tend to be aggressive men who are convinced that they see what other people miss and are comfortable withor addicted torisk. ...  From 2006 to 2015, the number of activist short campaigns rose by 1,230 percent, to 1,289. In the past three years, the number of activist short-sellers working globally has nearly doubled, to 72 from 39. Very few have a positive track record." [17] "Short researchers pore over balance sheets and sell their findings to hedge funds and money managers. For these financial gumshoes, who often charge into the upper five figures for their services, business is booming." [18]

 

         "Many investors dismissed the spectacular failures of Enron, WorldCom, HIH and ABC Learning Centres as unforeseeable black-swan-type events. Not Jim Chanos, founder of Kynikos Associates. He predicted their demise and profited from them.... Chanos started Kynikos (Greek for 'cynic') to profit from a practice known as short selling, where investors profit when the stock price of a company falls. ... You may never short a stock in your life, but if you understand what Chanos is looking for in a good short, then you'll know what shares to avoid. He offers three basic pointers: ... Chanos finds the accounting for companies that serially conduct mergers to be extremely murky. When debt is added to the mix, it often signals that all is not wellthe company may have resorted to chasing new streams of revenue just to maintain the illusion of earnings growth. ... Some of Chanos' most profitable shorts have been Eastman Kodak, Blockbuster and, more recently, Hewlett-Packard. These companies appeared cheap, often selling for single-digit price-earnings ratios. But all operated in sunset industries, victims of technological change that drove their earnings down year after year. ... Betting on an ailing business is like backing a bleeding horse; the pay-off is high but the odds are stacked heavily against you. ... Sensible, profitable investing is as much about avoiding the losers as it is betting on winners. The Jim Chanos approach will help you avoid the losers." [19]

 

        "The world is awash in credit. For the sake of investors, it had better be awash in good credit analysis, too. ... But in the process of spending so much brain power slicing and dicing risk and passing it around, Wall Street might miss more fundamental questions about the underlying health of companies issuing bonds. Frank Partnoy, of the University of San Diego, and David Skeel Jr. of the University of Pennsylvania Law School illustrated this point in a recent paper by pointing out that the banks that financed Enron's debt used massive amounts of credit derivatives to limit their own risk of the company going into default. That is one reason they might have fallen asleep at the switch." [20]

 

        "After 32 years in the industry18 of those at Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. of New Yorkand for 19 consecutive years being ranked on the Institutional Investor All-American Research Team, Mr. [Stephen] McClellan ... [authored] 'Full of Bull' (FT Press, 2007), half of it a critique of Wall Street research, the rest a sometime quirky but useful guide for investors (and advisors). ... Analysts are still very bad stock pickers. Their track record is terrible. You can't rely on their buy recommendations. ... Research is good in terms of analyzing the business, the competition and trends, but don't pay attention to the conclusions. ... Companies never have one bad quarter, or one surprise, or one earnings shortfall. Bad news feeds on itself. It takes awhile to reverse things. Wall Street never learns thatit's always trying to buy the stock at the bottom." [21]

 

        "Despite an economy teetering on the brink of a recessionif not already in oneanalysts are still painting a rosy picture of earnings growth, according to a study done by Penn State's Smeal College of Business. The report questions analysts' impartiality.... 'Wall Street analysts basically do two things: recommend stocks to buy and forecast earnings,' said J. Randall Woolridge, professor of finance. ... 'A significant factor in the upward bias in long-term earnings-rate forecasts is the reluctance of analysts to forecast' profit declines, Mr. Woolridge said. ... The study's authors said, 'Analysts are rewarded for biased forecasts by their employers, who want them to hype stocks so that the brokerage house can garner trading commissions and win underwriting deals.'" [22]

 

        "The main lesson for investors comes straight off the hymn sheet of Warren Buffett ... Don't buy what you don't understand." [23] A corollary might be: to understand a potential stock investment opportunity, one must engage in financial statement analysis.  



[1] Treasury & Risk, 5/08, "Playing it Safer"

[2] WSJ, 5/30/06, Commentary: "Short-Lived Lessons From an Enron Short"

[3] WSJ, 4/26/08, "A Columnist's Parting Advice"

[4] WSJ, 8/6/02, "We Need Better Stock Analysis, Not More Info"

[5] NYT, 2/28/02, "Wall St. Analysts Faulted on Enron"

[6] NYT, 6/4/06, "The Enron Case That Almost Wasn't"

[7] United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, U.S. Senate, October 2002, "Financial Statement Restatements Trends, Market Impacts, Regulatory Responses, and Remaining Challenges"

[8] James Chanos, President, Kynikos Associates—Prepared Statement [before the] U.S. Securities And Exchange Commission—Roundtable On Hedge Funds—Panel Discussion: "Hedge Fund Strategies and Market Participation"—Thursday, May 15, 2003

[9] The Guardian, 5/29/18, "The financial scandal no one is talking about"

[10] WSJ, 10/12/21, "The WSJ Wayback Machine"

[11] WSJ, 3/3/07, "My Lunch With 2 Fraudsters: Food for Thought for Investors"

[12] CNN.com, 10/9/99, "Financial fraud 101accounting for criminals"

[13] Crain's, 6/5/89, "Calculated Madness: The Rise and Fall of Crazy Eddie Antar"

[14] Bloomberg – Money Stuff, 7/17/20, "Wisecard"

[15] NYT, 2/8/20, "Wall Street's Most Reviled Investors Worry About Their Fate"

[16] WSJ, 10/20/08, "Don't Sell Hedge Funds Short"

[17] NYT, 6/8/17, "The Bounty Hunter of Wall Street"

[18] BusinessWeek, 5/7/01, "A Long Romp For The Shorts?"

[19] The Sidney Morning Herald, 1/21/13, "Lessons from short seller Jim Chanos"

[20] WSJ, 11/20/06, "Portfolio Insurance"

[21] InvestmentNews, 2/4/08, "Stephen McClellan"

[22] WSJ, 3/21/08, "Study Suggests Bias in Analysts' Rosy Forecasts"

[23] WSJ, 5/22/08, "Black Boxes Skew Ratings"

 

Financial Statement Analysis can "do" complex

 

 

        Historical Analysis version 2.3 (HAv2.3) and Projection version 2.3 (Pv2.3) are software tools specifically designed for conducting financial statement and quality of earnings analyses and forecasts. The insights generated by these tools are valuable for corporate Directors, individuals conducting thorough investigations before accepting Directorships, commercial lenders, credit managers, stock market investors, business school students, and various other professionals seeking comprehensive financial analyses.

 

Background

 

 

        The initial idea behind HAv2.3 and Pv2.3 originated in the Special Credits Department of a prominent West Coast bank during the late 1960s. The department's focus was on working with retailing and manufacturing companies. The bank aimed to create computer software that would aid in the training of Credit Analysts and prevent the approval of risky loans. Additionally, the software was intended to support customer development efforts. Throughout the years, these tools have undergone significant updates and refinements, incorporating numerous additional features.

 

        Corporate directors, prospective directors, credit managers, chief financial officers, accountants, commercial lenders, stock market analysts, individual investors, business planners, loan packagers, and business school students may find HAv2.3 and Pv2.3 beneficial in their work or educational pursuits.

 

 

Historical Analysis v2.3

 

 

        Historical Analysis v2.3 allows a user to input annual-historical-financial data to produce many reports, e.g.,

 

        

Historical Analysis Version 2.3 is a software tool that efficiently organizes and analyzes large volumes of financial statement data. In order to input data into HAv2.3 input sheets, one must carefully consider the accounting policies used by the company under analysis, as well as the underlying assumptions and financial statement footnotes. It can be beneficial to search for certain words and phrases, such as "substantial doubt," "significant deficiencies," "control weakness," "disclosure failure," "irregularities," "adverse material weakness," "negative impact," "subpoena," "search warrant," "defects," "penalty," or "resigned" in Form 10-K reports. However, we have observed that these words often appear long after our Predictor of Financial Distress and/or Quality of Reported Earnings sections have already indicated concerns based solely on the numerical information provided in the Form 10-K reports.

 

       HAv2.3 readily enables individuals to analyze patterns of important operational metrics such as increasing or decreasing gross-profit margins, return on investment, and corporate solvency. This analysis can assist in making informed decisions regarding investment candidates, whether it be selecting, terminating, or avoiding them altogether. HAv2.3 generates indications of favorable and unfavorable trends based on predefined thresholds. These thresholds have been set by our team with extensive industry expertise to ensure accurate results and minimize instances of incorrect classifications. Please click through and access our comprehensive annotated HAv2.3 Analysis of PetSmart, Inc.

 

        HAv2.3 generates cell color shading to highlight financial "red flags," e.g., questionable accounting practices, indicators of financial distress. "[D]istoring one section of the financial statements throws the numbers out of whack in some other section. ... Generally, the initial response of corporate executives caught in a lie is to dig themselves a deeper hole.... [A]nalysts must be disciplined enough to disbelieve the innocent explanations that companies routinely provide for ratios that in reality reveal trouble down the road." [1] In the computerized spreadsheet, the "red flags" are cross-referenced to explanatory comments or quotations from related media articles. One may click through to access an annotated PDF copy of our HAv2.3 Analysis of Twitter Home Entertainment.

 

        HAv2.3 has the ability to detect different financial irregularities and signs of financial difficulties well in advance of companies entering into bankruptcy proceedings or experiencing devastating drops in their stock prices. One tool is an Altman Z-Score analysis. "The Z-Score is ... a measure of how closely a firm resembles other firms that have filed for bankruptcy, i.e., it tries to assess the likelihood of economic bankruptcy. The model has also drawn several statistical objections over the years. ... Nevertheless, despite these flaws, the original Z-Score model is still the most widely used measure of corporate financial distress." [2] The Z-Score model is a tool that complements other analytical tools. Seldom, however, should one use any of the Z-Score measures as one's only means of analysis. "Usually, when a retail chain files for bankruptcy, customers see it coming. … [P]eople who know how to read a balance sheet can see it coming. … Sometimes, customers can tell based on store shelves. In the days before its bankruptcy, J.C. Penney's stores had a lot of empty shelves and many items available only in limited sizes." [3]

 

        We have conducted a thorough evaluation of the capabilities of HAv2.3 by performing back-tests based on examples mentioned in the United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, U.S. Senate, October 2002, "Financial Statement Restatements Trends, Market Impacts, Regulatory Responses, and Remaining Challenges." Our research demonstrated that HAv2.3 was successful in identifying potential financial crises in a timely manner. By utilizing HAv2.3, stock investors could have prevented costly purchasing mistakes, or alternatively, taken advantage of short-sale positions or the purchase of put options if pursuing a more aggressive strategy. (It should be noted that conducting a comprehensive analysis of the associated costs, such as the availability and cost of borrowing stock, timing considerations, the impact of meme investors, as well as the benefits of short selling and the complexities of purchasing put options, is beyond the scope of this platform.)

 

        Utilizing HAv2.3 is essential as it provides protection against "a boring market [that] can prod investors into trying to do exciting things. … [T]his is a good time for investors to remind themselves that an idle mind is the devil's workshop. …  [I]t's important to resist the pull of action for action's sake." [4]



[1] Financial Statement Analysis by Fridson & Alvarez, pp. 130, 148, 162.

[2] 4/13/11, Stockopedia: "The Altman Z-Score: Is it possible to predict corporate bankruptcy using a formula?"

[3] TheStreet.com, 918/23, "Popular women's clothing retailer files bankruptcy, closes Stores"

[4] WSJ, 9/2/16, "A Bored Investor Is a Dangerous Thing"

Projection v2.3

 

 

        Projection v2.3 provides the ability for a user with a higher level of expertise to enter a company's financial data for the most recent year-end as well as to input various forecasting assumptions such as growth rates, fixed charges, and turn-days. A significant portion of this data can be obtained from the analyses generated by HAv2.3. Once entered, Pv2.3 will then generate annual financial statements and analyses, enabling the user to test multiple scenarios.

 

        A major feature of Pv2.3 is that one may pre-specific desired constraint ratios and/or amounts, e.g., Worth-to-Debt, Times-Interest-Earned, Fixed-Charge-Coverage and/or Current ratios along with the amount of Working Capital. Using the aforesaid assumptions and constraints, Pv2.3 would allocate the funds needed (to balance the forecasted Balance Sheet) to Short-Term Debt, Long-Term Debt and/or Equity. One would not be required to engage in the seemingly endless task of manually allocating the anticipated funds needed, checking the impact on your desired ratios and amounts, and, then re-allocating and re-checking until you reach the multiple targets. The one-step non-iterative logic in Pv2.3 is more accurate and efficient than an iterative approach.  Pv2.3 uses cell color shading to remind that the funds-needed-allocation logic has been invoked and highlights the numerical results. Pv2.3 could reveal the amount, timing and nature of a company's future funding needs.

 

 

Recommended Readings

 

          "The primary attraction of investment books isn't beautiful prose or a compelling plot. Our relationship with such titles is more transactional. We spend the time and money in hopes of learning something that will help us make better investors." (9/8/22, WSJ, "'How to Invest' Review: Masters of Money; Interviews with some of the world's successful investors offer more in the way of biographical interest than practical advice.")

         

          The concepts of financial statement analysis and related red-flag tests used in Historical Analysis v2.3 and Projection v2.3 have been derived from various reputable sources, including books specifically focusing on financial statement analysis.

  1. Analysis of Financial Statements by Leopold A. Bernstein ["The vast resources that must be brought to bear on the competent analysis of equity securities have caused some segments of the securities markets to be more efficient than others. Thus, the market for shares of the largest companies is more efficient because many more analysts follow such securities ... compared to those who follow small and lesser-known companies. ... [T]he prevention of serious investment errors is at least as important a factor in overall investment success as is the discovery of undervalued securities. ... Financial statement analysis ... keeps the decision maker in touch with the underlying realities of the enterprise that is investigated."];

  2. Business Analysis & ValuationUsing Financial Statements by Krishna G. Palepu, Victor L. Bernard and Paul M Healy ["For the smallest publicly traded firms in the U.S., there is typically no formal following by analysts, and would-be investors and their advisors are left to themselves to conduct securities analysis. ... [E]ven though market prices reflect some relatively sophisticated analyses, prices still do not fully reflect all the information that could be garnered from publicly available financial statements. ... Even in the absence of direct information about management expertise, corporate strategy, engineering know-how, and market position, financial ratios can reveal much about who will make it and who will not."];

  3. Cash Flow and Security Analysis by Kenneth S. Hackel and Joshua Livnat ["This investment approach does not attempt to identify firms with superior growth prospects, which may or may not be realized. Instead it focuses on solid firms that temporarily mis-priced by the market. ... The purpose of this book is to advocate a fundamental approach to invest in equity securities based upon the analysis of free cash flows. ... One of the most attractive areas for investment is small-capitalization stocks. ... [F]irms that are controlled by owners are more profitable and have a greater tendency to diversify into related areas of business than firms that are controlled by managers."];

  4. Corporate Financial Reporting and Analysis (3rd ed.) by David F. Hawkins ["This book is based on the very successful Analysis of Corporate Financial Reports course taught in the MBA program of the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration. ... The thrust of the course is that published corporate financial statements can represent genuine managerial performance, or they can represent the illusion of performance. Investors who can tell the difference have a considerable advantage in making their investment decisions."];

  5. CPA Comprehensive Exam ReviewFinancial Accounting & Reporting by Nathan M. Bisk;

  6. Financial Fine Print: Uncovering a Company's True Value by Michelle Leder;

  7. Financial ShenanigansHow to Detect Accounting Gimmicks & Fraud in Financial Reports (4th ed.) by Howard M. Schilit ["While most companies act ethically and follow the rues when reporting their financial performance, some take advantage of gray areas in the rules (or worse, ignore the rules altogether) in order to 'make the numbers.' ... The lure of accounting gimmickry is particularly strong at struggling companies.... When one of these financial statements [Income Statement, Balance Sheet, Statement of Cash Flows] contains shenanigans, warning signs generally appear on the other ones. ... Accounting rules mandate that a company report its earnings performance using the accrual basis. That simply means you report revenue when it is earned (rather than when cash comes in) and charge expenses when the benefit has been received (rather than when payment occurs). In other words, the significance of cash inflows and outflows is muted under accrual-based accounting. ... [S]avvy investors often compare net income with CFFO and become concerned when CFFO lags net income. ... Executives know that investors test earnings quality by bench-marking earnings against CFFO.... It should therefore come as no surprise that companies have become more creative in their financial reporting and disclosure practices. Many have found innovative ways to mislead investors, using deceptive practices that may go undetected in traditional quality of earnings analysis."];

  8. Financial Statement Analysis A Practitioner's Guide by Martin S. Fridson ["[D]istorting one section of the financial statements throws the numbers out of whack in some other section. ... [I]nvariably, an allegation of irregularities in corporate financial reporting is followed by a vehement, formulaic denial. ... [A]nalysts must be disciplined enough to disbelieve the innocent explanations that companies routinely provide for ratios that in reality reveal trouble down the road. ... [A]n influential 1966 study ... found that of all the ratios tested, the best predictor of bankruptcy was a declining trend in the ratio of cash flow [Net Income + Depreciation, Depletion, and Amortization] to total debt. ... [F]inancial statements are vulnerable to manipulation, much of which is perfectly legal. Often, the specific aim of the manipulators is to outfox credit analysts who mechanically calculate ratios without pausing to consider whether accounting rules have defeated the purpose."];

  9. Financial Warnings by Charles W. Mulford and Eugene E. Comiskey ["We looked for financial statement clues that helped to indicate that something was amiss. ... We especially thank the approximately 200 lenders who completed the lender survey that provided invaluable information about earnings surprises. ... [W]hen a company overstates revenue, one or more accounts on the balance sheet must be overstated. ... When carefully executed with collusion among management personnel, financial frauds are difficult to uncover. ... Still it is clear that even the best fraud leaves some tracks in the financial statements."];

  10. Guide to Financial Reporting and Analysis by Eugene E. Comiskey and Charles W. Mulford;

  11. Handbook of Financial Analysis, Forecasting & Modeling by Jae K. Shim and Joel G. Siegel;

  12. Quality of Earnings The Investor's Guide to How Much Money a Company Is Really Earning by Thornton L. O'Glove [He tells investors where to scrutinize financial reports, and how to make sense of them. The "book ... is regarded by many investors as a forensic bible." (WSJ, 6/2/07, "The Buzz....")]; 

  13. When Stocks Crash Nicely The Finer Art of Short Selling by Kathryn F. Stacey ["This is a book about the people who profit from collapse, who specialize in detecting disaster, and about the methods they use to track the demise of companies.... How to make money by shorting and how not to lose money by selling are different sides of the same coin. ... James S. Chanos of Kynikos Associates, Ltd. ...shorts large capitalization financial companies with high probability of bankruptcy. ... [He tends] to focus on the numbers. ... One common shortcoming is to rely on management or Wall Street analysts. ... [H]is use of return on invested capital as a key financial indicator is unique.  ... Shorts almost always judge correctly whether the business is seaworthy. On the timing of the demise, they're seldom right. Someone is usually available to buy stock, loan money, offer short-term bank debt long after the company financials are in near terminal condition. Add two years to the short's best projection and you may only have a couple more to wait. ... Grizzled analyst wisdom says sell the stock of a company building a new headquartersowned, not leased: it's a top-of-the-earnings-cycle clue. ... Short sellers ... spend a fair amount of time and energy analyzing their mistakes.... You can hide disgusting accounting practices with growth for a very long time. ... [S]tories of short sale candidates are lessons in the antithesis of good company characteristics."];

  14. Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting (2d ed.) by G. Jack Bologna and Robert J. Lindquist ["[A]uditors … are not expected to search for illegal acts, but rather to be aware that some matters that come to their attention during the examination might suggest that illegal acts have occurred. If auditors discover an … illegal act, they are required to report it…."] (Editor's Note: Should an auditor perform a financial statement analysis? Are they are required to do so? If they do and find financial-statement fraud, they must act. This places them between a proverbial rock and a hard place. They could lose a client and audit fees. On the other hand, if they do not act and financial-statement fraud is later discovered, the auditors have legal exposure to investors and their client. Evidence of red flags discovered through financial statement analysis could justify imposition of damages against them.);

  15. Forensic Accounting—How to Investigate Financial Fraud by William T. Thornhill ["The forensic accountant should never underrate the intelligence of fraud perpetrators and should recognize that if they know the routine procedures of internal and/or external auditors, especially as to how they test and review activities and balances in a particular account, then they will perpetrate their fraud scheme so as to minimize possible discovery working against such review approaches."];

  16. Financial Statement Analysis (10th ed.) by K.R. Subramanyam and John J. Wild ["A survey of CFOs found that auditors challenged the company's financial results in less than 40% of audits. Of the CFOs challenged, most refused to back down-specifically, 25% persuaded the auditor to agree to the practice in question. and 32% convinced the auditor that the results were immaterial. Only 43% made changes to win the auditor's approval. …  Primary responsibility for fair and accurate financial reporting rests with managers. Managers have ultimate control over the integrity of the accounting system and the financial record that make up financial statements. … We know judgment is necessary in determining financial statement numbers. While accounting standards reduce subjectivity and arbitrariness in these judgments, they do not eliminate it. The exercise of managerial judgment arises both because accounting standards often allow managers to choose among alternative accounting methods and because of the estimation involved in arriving at accounting numbers. … Identifying earnings management and making proper adjustments to reported numbers are important tasks in financial statement analysis. … The SEC has also moved to discourage 'opinion shopping,' a practice where companies allegedly canvass audit firms to gain acceptance of accounting alternatives they desire to use before hiring auditors."];

  17. The EDGAR Online Guide to Decoding Financial StatementsTips, Tools, and Techniques for Becoming a Savvy Investor by Tom Taulli [Very good non-academic introduction to the subject. Full disclosure: the author gave me an honorable mention with respect to shareholder-rights efforts in the Luby's Cafeterias proxy context.];

  18. StreetSmart Guide to Short Selling by Tom Taulli ["Short sellers like confusion in the financials. It's a hint that the company is trying to hide something."].

  19. Master Financial Statements: Smashing Through Corporate Propaganda by Patrick G. Finegan, Jr. Esq. ["Here is what the auditor is really saying: 1. We took a look. 2. We did a few tests. 3. The financials are probably OK. 4. If they are not OK, we didn't write the financials - management did. Here is what the auditor doesn't say: 1. We guarantee our work. 2. We did an intense, excellent review. ... 6. We hope to get the job next year. 7. We could have been fooled, and therefore be completely wrong."];

  20. Financial Statement Fraud Casebook --- Baking the Ledgers and Cooking the Books by Joseph T. Wells [By utilizing HAv2.3, individuals can potentially identify instances of financial statement manipulation. This resource delves into the intricate details, revealing the underlying paper trail that led to such manipulation, as well as providing guidance on conducting relevant investigations. Interestingly, certain educational institutions offer degree programs in fraud examination and financial forensics.].

        Other books, dealing with stock market investing, that may be of related interest, are:

  1. Contrarian Investing by Anthony M. Gallea and William Patalon III ["Much of what passes for contrarian investing is actually 'value' investing, a less-extreme discipline that shares some contrarian characteristics. ... Success as a contrarian demands a long-term view, and a willingness to hold many of the stocks for two to three years. ... [R]esearch shows that it is not a good practice for investors to share their market opinions with others. ... By expressing their views, investors saddle themselves with the additional burden of being shown wrong. Since so few of us are willing to admit error, we'll go to unusual ends to stand by our positions. ... [F]undamental analysis [is] beyond the scope of this book. ... If you're in love with a stock ... [y]ou're so convince[d] that you're willing to take any kind of pain to be proved right in the end. ... Averaging down gets people into a lot of trouble. ... [W]e will look at stocks that first meet a technical measure (stock price down 50 percent from its 12-month high), and the meet at least two of four fundamental indicators: a price/earnings (P/E) ratio of less than 12 A price/book value (P/BV) ratio of less than 1.0 A price/free cash flow (P/FCF) ratio of less than 10 A price/sales (P/S) ratio of less than 1.0 ... [K]nowing when to sell may be the most difficult skill to master. ... [T]he contrarian's time is better spent on larger ideas rather than footnotes buried in the back of annual reports. We believe the technical, financial and accounting knowledge needed to decipher these reports is beyond the ability of most investors. ... A company meeting all four of our fundamental-ratio indicators would have to be scrutinized very carefully. It might well be too sick to survive. ... [Investors] may have a good investment strategy or technique, but they're not comfortable with it because it's not compatible with their natures. The result: They don't stick with it."];

  2. The Psychology of Smart Investing by Ira Epstein and David Garfield, M.D. ["(I)f you arm ... an investor with the right psychological tools, you could give him a critical edge; you could help him avoid mental blunders and seize opportunities he might have missed if he were less self-aware. ... We get so caught up in the markets that we don't even consider our attitudes and biases and how they might be impacting upon our decisions. ... [Y]ou make investment mistakes not because you lack information, but because you ignore the information you already possess. You don't follow your systems or pay attention to your indicators because powerful internal forces are at work that stand between you and success. ... It is not what ails you, but how you deal with it that is the key to success in the markets. ... Some investors are very good at cutting their losses, but they are not so good when it comes to holding a position or increasing it. It all comes down to being 'psychologically ' able to win. ... If you see market forces or receive other information indicating that the winner will soon be a loser, fine, get rid of it. But if your impulse is fear, be skeptical. Winners are tough to find, so once you've latched on to this precious commodity, don't give it up without a solid reason. ... It's a process, and any process takes a while to master and take hold. ... [Y]ou can train [your mind] to make wise and more beneficial decisions about how to invest your money."].

          Here are some additional books that cover a range of general business and finance subjects, which you might find interesting:

  1. Ideas Are FreeHow the Idea Revolution Is Liberating People and Transforming Organizations by Alan G. Robinson & Dean M. Schroeder ["[M]ost organizations are far more effective in suppressing employee ideas than promoting them. ... Ideas Are Free shows managers how to tap all the ideas their employees have and gain significant advantage over their competitors. ... [M]ost business leaders manage from financial measures-that is, lagging indicators that impart mostly historical information. On the other hand, the most important indicator he uses is the number of ideas implemented in the previous week. This … is the best leading indicator of his company's future performance. …When managers first realize the value in the ideas of their employees, it is a profoundly liberating experience. When they learn how to go after these ideas, they also learn that it is well worth the time and effort. Ideas are free. Employees become allies in solving problems, spotting opportunities, and moving the company forward, to the benefit of all. And when managers decide to let their employees think alongside them-and no longer seek to go it alone-they will have joined the Idea Revolution."];

  2. Ahead of the Curve Two Years at Harvard Business School by Philip Delves Broughton ["The bankers in the class told us that they would frequently produce proposals to companies, with elaborate valuation spreadsheets, knowing they were nonsense. They bore the appearance of competence and intelligence, but meant desperately little. ... It ... seemed to me ... downright deception. ... The degree enabled them to get jobs that robbed them of their private lives. ... Do what you love. Don't settle. ... If you love what you do, the money will follow."];

  3. Manias, Panics, and Crashes A History of Financial Crises by Charles P. Kindleberger ["One problem with warnings, of course, is embodied in the fable of the boy who cried, 'Wolf.' Economic forecasters may know the direction of a move in business conditions, prices, and credit, but their capacity to foretell its precise timing is limited. ... In warning the market, or in providing it with information that it ought to have, one must first get the bemused speculators to pay attention, and then time the announcement soon enough to do good but late enough to be credible and heeded. Neither task is easy."];

  4. A Nation of Counterfeiters by Stephen Mihm;

  5. Billion Dollar Lessons by Paul B. Carroll and Chunka Mui;

  6. Money, Greed, and Risk by Charles R. Morris; 

  7. Bailout An Insider Account of How Washington Abandoned Main Street While Rescuing Wall Street by Neil Barofsky;

  8. The Payoff—Why Wall Street Always Wins by Jeff Connaughton ["I should've known that the legal and regulatory system meant to protect us had rotten away. ... I can't explain why President Obama (and Vice President Biden) have failed to support stronger enforcement efforts or financial reform.... Obama and Biden gave the problem a sideways glance and then delegated the solutions to the same circle of Wall Street-Washington technocrats who brought the financial disaster upon us in the first place. ... Unfortunately for American, Obama and Biden ... were both financially illiterate."];

  9. Bull By The HornsFighting to Save Main Street from Wall Street and Wall Street from Itself by Shelia Bair ["Financial concepts are not that difficult if you have a little time to study them. ... Sometimes I think that people in the financial sector don't want you to understand the issues."];

  10. A Fighting Chance by Elizabeth Warren ["It was the ultimate insiders' play: Trust us because we understand it and you don't."];

  11. America's First Great DepressionEconomic Crisis and Political Disorder After the Panic of 1837 by Alasdair Roberts. ["'Everyone with whom I converse, talks of 100 percent as the lowest return on investment. No one is known ever to have lost anything by a purchase of real estate.' John M. Gordon, an investor from Baltimore, reporting on land sales in southern Michigan, 1836."];

  12. In My Shoes by Tamara Mellon ["The Holy Grail of private equity is an accounting metric known as EBITDA.... EBITDA multiplied by a certain numberusually around 10-12 in the fashion businessis the basis for valuation upon exit. And in private equity, it's all about the exit. ... It appeared to me that for the right hourly rate, lawyers and financial advisers were more than happy to sign on and ride even a dead horse for as long as it would last. ... These were midlevel private-equity people who hadn't learned that you can't just screw everyone. All they cared about was their own monthly fees, their 20 percent on exit, and their favorable tax rates. They were like feedlot farmers who don't care about the cruel and squalid conditions or the hormones and chemicals flooding into their animals. Their only concern is that their livestock put on sufficient weight to bring top dollar when slaughtered."];

  13. The Chickenshit Club by Jesse Eisinger [The long history of how and why the Department of Justice morphed from seeking individual accountability of corporate officers and directors to seeking Deferred Prosecution Agreements with corporations (think "too big to fail") where shareholders ultimately pay for the culprits' deeds.];

  14. History's Greatest Deceptions and Confidence Scams by Rodger and Lazaroff ["[T]he victims of financial scams have tended throughout history to follow a certain pattern. … The one group demonstrated a willingness to believe; a higher than average tolerance for risk, and the need … to be part of an elite group, believing themselves to better or more educated than the general hoi polloi. … The second faction exhibits dissatisfaction and often begrudges others who have a higher economic status, leading to a readiness take precarious risks to improve their lot. … Church-based affinity crimes are the most common simply because there is a group of people who have complete faith in a trusted leader. The con-man draws in the leader and the rest of the flock will follow until they are all suitably fleeced. ... [T]he majority of us assume ourselves to be superior to others and therefore above being scammed. With that perspective, it becomes clear that we are scamming ourselves. ... Secrecy often has a role to play in cons and scams.... Human beings want to believe, want to trust and want to think they are smarter than other people."];

  15. Corporate Fraud Handbook - Prevention and Detection by Joseph T. Wells ["[T]he frauds ... were most commonly detected by tip (40.2 percent)."];

  16. Analysis Without Paralysis12 Tools to Make Better Strategic Decisions by Babette E. Bensoussan and Craig S. Fleisher ["This book's premise is that businesspeople working in any environment must have a robust and healthy selection of tools and techniques to help them address important issues and answer important questions about their enterprises' abilities to compete--not only in the present, but also in the future. ... [F]inancial ratio analysis is a useful tool for analyzing management's decisions as they are manifest in the marketplace, but it cannot replace the insights afforded by the application of a variety of analysis tools."];

  17. The Intelligence TrapWhy Smart People Make Dumb Mistakes by David Robson ["(S)marter people are not investing their money in the more rational manner that economists might anticipate; it is another sign that intelligence does not necessarily lead to better decision making. ... [Benjamin Franklin] called his method a kind of 'moral algebra' ... much like a modern pros and cons list. He would ... assign them a number based on importance."];

  18. Dark Towers by David Enrich [Gross is great; but net is where it's at. "And so MortgageIT kept churning out mortgages, and Deutsche kept packaging them into securities, which it sold to investors. As prosecutors later found, the bank lied to clients that it was conducting rigorous due diligence when in fact MortgageIT had stopped doing any due diligence whatsoever."];

  19. Outside the Box by Marc Levinson ["The amount exported from any of the countries in a firm's value chain reveals little about those countries' economies, because those exports contain content, whether parts or ideas, that originates elsewhere. The numbers that matter economically concern not exports, but value added. … These basic financial considerations—finding the least costly way to make and deliver the goods—drove decisions about organizing value chains. … Half the firms studied gave no consideration to the possibility that poor quality, long lead times, late deliveries, empty shelves, and dependence on a single source of critical products could hurt their bottom lines. Hardly any attention was paid to the risks arising from the sheer number of firms that might be involved in any given value chain, each needing to complete its tasks on schedule for the entire chain to function smoothly. Cheap was what mattered. … Perhaps the most serious question is what will happen to the arrangements that encouraged globalization and shaped international relations for the better part of a century. … For all their many flaws, they reduced the frequency and breadth of armed conflict around the world and brought a remarkable improvement in the living standards of billions of people."];

  20. You're About to Make a Terrible Mistake! - How Biases Distort Decision-Makingand When You Can Do to Fight Them by Oliver Sibony ["Even if you are a competent, careful, and hardworking executive, you might end up making avoidable, predictable mistakes. This is precisely the mysterious problem of bad decisions by good leaders.... [V]iew yourself as the architect of the decision process on your team.... [O]ne can draw a false conclusion from accurate facts. Fact-checking is not the same as story-checking. ... [W]hy shouldn't we study worst-practices? After all, everyone agrees that we learn from our mistakes even more than from our successes. Studying companies that collapsed may hold more lessons than focusing on those that succeed. Learning from their mistakes might be a good way to avoid making them ourselves. … [I]t's almost irresistibly tempting to quash one's doubts about the proposed investment….  Even experienced managers whose interests are all perfectly aligned may choose to preserve the harmony of the group rather than express a well-founded criticism. … 'We cheat up to the level that allows us to retain our self-image as reasonably honest individuals.' … In truth, almost all of us are capable of producing good financial analysis on proposed investment decisions. … The technical quality of financial analysis is no longer a source of differentiation between good and bad decisions: it's a prerequisite. … How does a premortem differ from what almost all teams do—have a discussion of the risks and uncertainties facing the project? … First, remember what hind-sight bias teaches us: we are much more talented when explaining what has happened (in the past) than when imaging what may happen (in the future). The premortem astutely takes advantage of this bias: it asks us to travel in time to the future so we can look back, as it asks us to explain what 'has happened' in this imagined past. It is a clever oxymoron.  … [T]he most valuable outcome of a premortum is the identification of flaws that have not been discussed. … A large diversified corporation has adopted this principle: it systematically submits all its business units to a regular portfolio review (annually or every two years). The review asks a simple question: if we didn't own this company, would we buy it today? … [T]he question of disposal is immediately raised. … The first routine is based on the same principle as the checklist: establish a framework that lists the criteria to consider whenever a decision must be made. ... An age-old piece of advice applies here: sleep on it. ... Letting a night go by is a simple way to attain some distance and to avoid deciding while in the grip of emotions."];

  21. How to Decide—Simple Tools for Making Better Choices by Annie Duke ["Even though you don't have any detail about the decision process, when I tell you how things turned out, it feels like you really know something about whether the decision was good or bad. … You buy a stock. It quadruples in price. It feels like a great decision. You buy a stock. It goes to zero. It feels like a terrible decision. … In every domain, the outcome tail is wagging the decision dog. … Luck is what intervenes between you decision (which has a range of possible outcomes) and the outcome that you actually get. … The actual outcome casts a shadow over your ability to remember what you knew at the time of the decision. … Writing down key facts informing your decision also acts like a vaccine against hindsight bias. … If luck is the culprit, your decision-making is off the hook. If luck is the culprit, the outcome was out of your control. It means that there is nothing to be learned…. In a premortem, you imagine that you made a specific decision that worked out poorly or that you failed to reach a goal. From the vantage point of having already experienced the future failure, you look back to the present and identify the reasons why that might have happened. … A common practice of successful professional investors is to make category decisions to avoid investments outside their circle of competence. … In the wake of positive investing results, you overrate your ability to choose stocks…."];

  22. Discussion MaterialsTales of a Rookie Wall Street Investment Banker by Bill Keenan ["Bankers have no issue advising companies on how to invest billions of dollars, but are more often than not at a loss what to do with their own money. ... Despite what theory says or what's publicly stated as rationale, real companies with real people managing them do deals for one reason: they feel pressure. ... The banker's job is to sniff out its origin and double down with a cast iron clamp to guarantee a transaction closes and a hefty fee follows. ... It's no surprise that most deals are viewed as failures in retrospect."];

  23. The Cult of We by Elliot Brown and Maureen Farrell ["Simply put, bubbles are the result of a herd of people who collectively start paying more for something than its intrinsic value. They are, at their core, a very human creation-a stampede of investors who are following the scent of a compelling narrative. Gluts of capital combine with a fear of missing out. The result is mania. The rising price feeds on itself, and investors convince one another the world has changed-that high prices are here to stay. Those participating are often intelligent-even aware of the madness. Yet conformity has a powerful pull. … In bubbles, the herd and its collective psychology prevail over the individual. Euphoria wins out over skepticism. Still more investors clamor to get in on the rising riches, pushing prices up further. … These investors were considered the smart money-the ones investing on behalf of wealthy families or endowments or pensions who had their pick of advisers. But in a world awash in cash, these investors feared missing out on the next big, highly lucrative idea. More often than not, the risks were brushed aside, the downsides minimized. ... [I]nnovation and disruption were ascendant and critical questions were often dismissed as obnoxious cynicism."].

  24. What the Dog Saw and Other Adventures—Open Secrets: Enron, Intelligence, and the Perils of Too Much Information—by  Malcolm Gladwell ["In the spring of 1998 … a group of six students at Cornell University's business school decided to do their term project on Enron. [] It was for an advanced financial-statement-analysis class taught by a guy at Cornell called Charles Lee….  [L]ee had led his students through a series of intensive case studies, teaching them techniques and sophisticated tools to make sense of the vast amounts of information that companies disclose in their annual reports and SEC filings. … The people in the group reviewed Enron's accounting practices as best they could. … They used statistical tools, designed to find telltale patterns in the company's financial performance - the Beneish model, the Lev and Thiagarajan indicators, the Edwards-Bell-Ohlsen analysis – and made their way through pages and pages of footnotes. … The students' conclusions were straightforward. … There were clear signs that 'Enron may be manipulating its earnings.' … The report was posted on the website of the Cornell University business school, where it has been, ever since, for anyone who cares to read twenty-three pages of analysis."] The question is: What does one do with the information—avoid, sell, sell-short?

  25. Fair Value Accounting Fraud by Gerard M. Zack ["Altered Report. Management may have arranged for and received a valuation report from a respected professional valuation expert. But the report does not support the position preferred by management. Could it be possible for management to make alterations to the report … in order to make it appear that the expert supported the fraudulent valuation reflected in the financial statements of the entity? Reports should be reviewed carefully for signs of altered text, missing pages, additions inserted into the report, or other signs of alteration. … Here are 10 signs to watch out for in valuation reports. …Valuation reports should be reviewed carefully for these warning signs. Just because a fair value is supported by a professional-looking report is not a justification for blindly accepting it as accurate."] The skeptical recipient of the report could communicate directly with the report's author to obtain an original copy, and compare it to that he/she indirectly received.

  26. Retail Gangster by Gary Weiss ["Having all that cash around was no big deal. Sammy [Antar] later recalled,: 'It wasn't explained. Our dads didn't sit us down and say '"This is nebkdi.'" We just saw and copied, as kids always do. It was part of our early childhood development: reading, writing and skimming.' ...  [Eddie Antar] didn't have the foggiest idea how to explain all those numbers he carefully inflated. … [E]ddie was displaying a talent for hiring the right people. … '[The corporate PR man] knew all the analysts on the Street…. He made it easy to be analyst. Wall Street analysts just wrote down what [he] told them and did not bother with all that financial stuff.' … A[] request was made to inflate the value of merchandise in a warehouse, in this case the primary one that served all Crazy Eddie stores. … [B]rokerage house analysts [] crowing about Crazy Eddie had helped elevate the stock, and they were made to look like credulous fools by the company's collapse."] Back testing with HAv2.3 showed that CRZY's financials were "crazy" from the time of its IPO.

  27. Fraud And Abuse in Nonprofit Organizations --- A guide to Prevention and Detection by Gerard M Zack ["Skimming of cash receipts involves the theft of funds intended for an organization before the funds have been recorded on the books. The term 'cash receipts' as it is used here is intended to cover not just cash collected, but also checks, credit card payments, and any other form of payment intended for an organization. … [M]any nonprofit organizations naively think that checks made payable to the organization cannot be converted to cash. … The process of converting stolen checks to cash is remarkably easy. The perpetrator simply opens a bank account in the name of the nonprofit organization to whom the checks are written, with the perpetrator as the authorized signer on the account. The account is usually opened at a bank with whom the nonprofit organization has no current relationship. … The perpetrator's home address, or that of a friend or relative, is used as the address to which bank statements are to be mailed. Sometimes a post office box is used for the receipt of bank statements. … [A] bank may request copies of organizational documents or other items, such as articles of incorporation, a board authorization, or some similar document. Each of these documents is relatively easy to fraudulently create with modern word processing software. …  To minimize the risk associated with supplying an employer identification number, the perpetrator usually will open a non-interest-bearing account. This way, there is no reporting of interest income to the Internal Revenue Service…. Frequently, perpetrators of skimming frauds write checks out of the fraudulently opened account to pay personal bills, as well as to purchase extravagant items. … [T]he skimming of charitable contributions intended for a nonprofit organization is the most difficult to detect. … All a donor anticipates in exchange for her contribution is a thank you. … There are also a handful of internal controls that can detect whether charitable contributions have been skimmed. … Periodically mailing statements of donor activity based on recorded contributions and following up on calls or complaints from donors expressing concerns that their statements do not reflect all gifts made…. Missing from the preceding list of detective controls is a system of providing receipts or acknowledgments to donors. The absence of this procedure as an internal control to reduce the risk of skimming may surprise some readers. However, donor acknowledgment systems almost never provide any reasonable level of assurance that skimming is not taking place. The reason that these systems rarely provide any reliable control is that donors can almost never differentiate a legitimate receipt from a fraudulent one. Even if receipts and acknowledgement letters are pre-numbered and kept under strong physical security, perpetrators of skimming frauds can very easily replicate or otherwise design authentic-looking receipts or acknowledgment letters to send to donors from whom contributions have been skimmed."]

  28. How to Steal A Lot of Money Legally -- Clueless Crooks Go to Jail, Savvy Swindlers Go to Vail by Edward Siedle ["There is absolutely nothing worse you can do to abuse clients that the guys on Wall Street haven't already done/disclosed/gotten away with -- legally."] One is amazed by a system that permits fiduciaries to utilize excessive and unnecessary fees to enrich themselves and their friends at the expense of those who mistakenly think they are protected by honorable people. A better argument for learning investment self-defense, and making informed decisions for yourself, has not been written.

  29. Den of Thieves by James B. Stewart ["It was the criminals who earned astronomical returns. … [M]ilken's 'genius' seemed his ability to make so many believe his gospel of high return at low risk. … With astonishing speed, some of Milken's biggest boosters began to collapse under the weight of the debt burdens they had embraced with such enthusiasm. … 'Welcome to the world of sleaze.'" This is the story of investment bankers, stock and bond traders, attorneys, mutual fund managers, arbitragers, public-relations specialists acting badly during the take-over boom of the 1980s, and ensuing investigations, settlements and convictions. The perpetrators traded on insider information for fun and big profit. They inflicted unconscionable mark-ups and mark-downs on customers' trades. They lied to and cheated one another. They parked stocks to avoid net capital requirements. They obstructed justice, e.g., destruction of documents, perjury, threats, thinly-disguised bribes. They worked to destroy the integrity of financial markets. Where were internal controls and supervision? Where was the "Chinese Wall" to keep confidential information seeping from the Investment Banking Department to the Trading and/or Arbitrage Departments? Where were restricted-trading lists? "Poorly paid, shunned by upper-level managers and partners, compliance officers were kept far from the center of action. They are paid to maintain an appearance of self-policing in the securities industry—without actually instigating too many investigations. … [T]he person in charge of compliance in Beverly Hills reported to Lowell [Milken]…." The wolves guarded the chicken coop. Highly-paid and well-known attorneys—so-called pillars of the legal community—did not or did not want to recognize their many conflicts of interest. Some were irate when asked to itemize their humongous bills. Where were the regulators' sophisticated computer-surveillance systems and the NYSE's human investigators? Eventually, the DOJ and SEC moved up the food chain. However, the government failed to cause the perpetrators to disclose their total finances before entering into settlement agreements. Too much was left on the table. Even though only a perpetrator's ill-gotten gains are legitimately subject to disgorgement upon conviction, settlement negotiations are different. In one instance, the government permitted a perpetrator to use non-public information to secure the government's receipt of a large settlement that depended upon the liquidation of the perpetrator's large-securities portfolio. One could learn much from these negative examples.]

  30. Extraordinary Circumstances by Cynthia Cooper provides a comprehensive account of her role as an Internal Auditor in uncovering significant financial fraud at WorldCom. The book delves into her experiences conducting operational and financial-statement audits. Additionally, Cooper highlights the involvement of Arthur Anderson, the auditing firm, in conducting analytical reviews to compare financial statement ratios. Importantly, the main perpetrator of the fraud manipulated the financial ratios to deceive auditors, analysts, and investors into believing they were accurate and legitimate. However, the utilization of HAv2.3 would have effectively detected WorldCom's manipulations of bad-debt allowances and reserves, as well as the conversion of expenses into capital expenditures.  

        A newspaper article that expressed an investor vs. gambler approach to stock market activities, and our responsive letter-to-the-editor:

 

    1.    "Stock market classes: Never a dull moment"

 

 

 

Learn By Negative Example

  

        "Less than two weeks before the casino opened, Marvin B. Roffman, a casino analyst at Janney Montgomery Scott, an investment firm based in Philadelphia, told The Wall Street Journal that the Taj would need to reap $1.3 million a day just to make its interest payments, a sum no casino had ever achieved. 'The market just isn't there,' Mr. Roffman told The Journal. Mr. [Donald] Trump retaliated, demanding that Janney Montgomery Scott fire Mr. Roffman. It did. … Mr. Roffman had won a $750,000 arbitration award from Janney Montgomery for his dismissal and settled a lawsuit against Mr. Trump for an undisclosed sum. … 'There's something not right when every single one of your projects doesn't work out,' said Mr. Roffman, the casino analyst." [1] "A Philadelphia securities analyst who refused to retract negative comments about a casino owned by Donald J. Trump and was subsequently dismissed won a $750,000 award from his former firm yesterday. The award to the analyst, Marvin B. Roffman, which was ordered by a three-member arbitration panel of the New York Stock Exchange, was announced by his former brokerage firm, Janney Montgomery Scott Inc. When Mr. Roffman was dismissed last March, the firm denied that its move had been prompted by Mr. Trump, who had threatened to sue unless it forced the analyst to retract and apologize, or dismissed him. … Mr. Roffman, one of the first to signal that Mr. Trump was in financial difficulty, was originally quoted in The Wall Street Journal in March 1990 as expressing severe reservations about the future of the Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City." [2]

        "A former Deutsche Bank AG analyst once ranked among the best in the U.S. will pay a $100,000 penalty and be banned from the securities industry for a year to settle a regulator's claims that he issued a buy recommendation at odds with his personal opinion. Charles Grom recommended buying shares of discount retailer Big Lots Inc. in a March 29, 2012, report while telling colleagues internally that he didn't downgrade the company because he wanted to maintain his relationship with its management, the Securities and Exchange Commission said in a statement Wednesday. Mr. Grom agreed to resolve the SEC's allegations without admitting or denying wrongdoing. … Mr. Grom [] was named the top-ranked department store analyst in 2012 by business-to-business publisher Institutional Investor…. After visiting with Big Lots executives, Mr. Grom communicated with a number of hedge fund clients about the company, the SEC said. Four of the hedge funds subsequently sold their entire positions in Big Lots stock, according to the regulator. … SEC rules require analysts to certify that their reports reflect their own beliefs about companies they're evaluating. Wall Street banks agreed to a $1.4 billion settlement in 2003 to settle allegations that analysts published misleading stock research in a bid to win investment-banking business." [3]

      "Mr. [James] Melcher of Balestra Capital said he found the research to be a guide to the prevailing view about a company or industry. Often, he takes Wall Street's ratings as a contrarian indicator and does the opposite of what the analysts are recommending. In other words, when all the analysts say 'buy,' it's often a good time to sell. 'When we see all the analysts go one way, we take a very serious look at going the other way,' he said. 'And it has paid off over the years.'" [4]

        "Most of David Einhorn's ideas work out brilliantly. He is a 39-year-old hedge-fund manager in Manhattan who oversees $6 billion. Bull markets? Bear markets? It hardly matters. His stock portfolio has averaged 25% annual returns since 1996, when he opened Greenlight Capital. Now Mr. Einhorn has written a book. ... In 'Fooling Some of the People All of the Time' .... The story starts in 2002, with Mr. Einhorn rightly proud of his ability to spot companies with shoddy accounting practices. ... Convinced that he has found another juicy target, he zeroes in on Allied Capital, a business-financing company that seems to dawdle when it comes to marking down the value of its troubled loans. ... Allied eventually did take big write-downs.... He grew so irate about the company's accounting that he alerted the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC did little with his complaint; in fact, it investigated him instead for spreading negative views about Allied. ... An SEC lawyer who quizzed him aggressively about his short-selling methods later went into private practice and registered as a lobbyist for Allied. ... The book also shows why good accounting really matters. It is easy to mock finicky people with green eyeshades who worry about financial footnotes. But reliable numbers are essential if capital is to be allocated properly in our economy. ... Mr. Einhorn is a hard-liner, wanting strict accounting standards that punish missteps quickly. Allied Capital, to judge by his version of events, liked living in a more lenient world, where there was plenty of time to patch up problems quietly. Regulators were comfortable with an easy-credit philosophy, too, to a degree that startled Mr. Einhorn. In the current financial shakeout, people like Mr. Einhorn are entitled to say: 'I told you so.'"  [5]

        "[M]r. [Louis] Lowenstein ... is a lawyer, a former business executive and a professor emeritus of finance and law at Columbia Law School. ... [H]e is a proud disciple of the 'value investing' principles outlined by Columbia professors Benjamin Graham and David L. Dodd in 1934. ... Mr. Lowenstein balances his critique of rapacious mutual funds with an analysis of two relatively new funds ... [with] business models [that] mirror the Graham-Dodd philosophy of focusing on a few carefully selected stocks rather than diversifying in the name of safety, which is typically a euphemism for lazy research, Mr. Lowenstein says." [6]  

        "Perhaps all it takes to keep an analyst from downgrading a company's stock is a couple of favors from the chief executive officer. That, at least, is the conclusion of a new study by two business-school professors. James Westphal of the University of Michigan's Stephen M. Ross School of Business and Michael Clement of the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas found that nearly two-thirds of securities analysts receive advice, introductions to other high-powered executives, or other favors from top managers at the firms they cover. ... [A]s a company's reported earnings slipped, executives became more likely to do favors for analysts covering it. ... Analysts are only half as likely to downgrade a company's stock after it announced earnings below the consensus forecast if one of the firm's executives does two or more favors for the stock picker. The study also found that executives tend to reach out to the analysts with the most influence. ... The favors executives rendered most frequently included connecting an analyst with a high-ranking official at another company (comprising 28% of favors in surveys of analysts), providing career advice (20%), offering to meet with the analyst's clients (13%), and passing along information on industry trends (10%). ... Professionally, the analysts may stand to gain considerably more from their access to executives at the firms they cover than they might lose by failing to downgrade a stock that truly deserves it. ...  So, who loses? Westphal and Clement argue that executives' favor-wielding risks undermining the objectivity of analysts' reports. For big institutional investors, who probably have their own stable of analysts, other views may not be tough to come by. But individual investors should know that analysts and executives are trading favors...." [7]

        "Stock analysts have long been criticized for issuing very few 'sell' recommendations on stocks they cover. If you want to know why they still often are reluctant to be publicly negative, spend a few minutes with Eric Wold, analyst at the San Francisco investment-banking boutique Merriman Curhan Ford & Co. His reward for slapping a sell rating on Nautilus Inc.? He says the company won't return his phone calls anymore. ... Their lack of response, he says, appears directly related to the increasingly critical nature of his reports, which culminated in June 2006 with his downgrade to a sell 'on heightened concerns' over a variety of issues. This was one month after Mr. Wold wrote that he was 'unconvinced' the company, which had a series of missteps and disappointments, 'has turned the corner.' ... [H]e realized the new strategy was 'cannibalizing existing sales and shifting sales from high-margin channels to low-margin channels.' ... He red-flagged such things as undershooting on earnings forecasts, increased competition.... Ron Arp, Nautilus's senior vice president of corporate communications, says ... (that) it is 'not true' that the company won't talk to Mr. Wold. ... 'That is hilarious,' Mr. Wold responds. ...  In looking back, the lack of access forced Mr. Wold to rely only on publicly disclosed numbers and outside resources for his analysis, and in doing so he got it right. Maybe that is the moral of this story: Let the numbers do the talking, not the company." [8]

       "Journalist Michelle Leder learned the hard way about not reading the footnotes. ... Afterward, she decided to go back to see what she might have found had she looked more closely at the footnotes in the company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings. There was plenty, says Ms. Leder, who used the experience as the launching pad for her Web site, Footnoted.org, which tries to ferret out facts that otherwise might go unnoticed. ... In quarterly filings, Ms. Leder often heads straight to the footnotes on commitments and contingencies. This section differs from that on 'risk factors,' she says, because it tends to be more specific and less boilerplate. ... "[S]ophisticated investors will dig into the footnotes to determine if everything is as the company said it was. ... In 10-Ks, Bob Olstein of Olstein Funds ... starts with a review of the note on income taxes. 'What I want to see,' Mr. Olstein says, 'is a reconciliation of the income the company is reporting to shareholders and the income being reported to the [Internal Revenue Service].' A big difference between the two can be a red flag that requires further research, which he says was the case with Sunbeam, the appliance maker that got caught up in an accounting scandal in the late 1990s. ...  Mr. Olstein ...  also look[s] at the footnotes on raw materials, work in progress and finished goods. 'A huge build in raw materials and work in progress relative to finished goods can mean orders are picking up,' Mr. Olstein says. 'The reverse can be if finished goods are building and raw materials are not.'" [9]

         "[C]orporate earnings reports have outstripped analysts' expectations, contributing in no small part to the fizzy mood on Wall Street. But here's a sobering thought: those expectations were way too low in the first place. ... But why were analysts so far off the mark? Largely because of the so-called guidance provided by company after company, setting investors up for a pleasant surprise when earnings were announced." [10]

       "[T]he vast majority of analyst recommendations remain bullish. ... [I]ndividuals and institutions alike want to see stocks go up, so they prefer bullish analysts over bearish ones. But another, greater source of pressure are the companies the analysts cover. Managements that are showered in stock options have their personal wealth directly tied to a rising stock price, so they are often infuriated when an analyst puts out a critical report or downgrades a rating to a sell. And they retaliate. They refuse to allow the negative analyst to ask questions on conference calls. They somehow 'forget' to include him in e-mail messages that are sent to other analysts. They decline to attend that analyst's conferences. They complain to his boss, who then inquires as to why the analyst has to be so darn negative all the time. Many companies still use investment banking business as a way to reward the firms that employ analysts they like and punish the ones with analysts they don't like.... And sometimes companies sue.... [I]t works. ... These are bullish times in the stock market, so it is easy to forget how important it is to have skepticaland even negativevoices to counterbalance all the happy talk surrounding stocks. Even when the skeptics are wrong, they make the market healthier because they offer a point of view that people need to hear." [11]

        "Jerry W. Levin says he welcomed help from Sunbeam Corp. directors when he was named CEO of the consumer-products maker in 1998 after directors fired Albert J. Dunlap amid accounting problems. Mr. Levin previously had run Coleman Co., before Sunbeam acquired it. Directors met almost every day by phone for months, recalls Mr. [Charles] Elson, the Delaware governance expert who was a Sunbeam director at the time. The board counseled Mr. Levin.... But Mr. Levin says he was surprised that the board knew so little about the extent of Sunbeam's accounting problems, as his team uncovered them. '"They said, 'It's unimaginable that such massive fraud could have taken place under our noses,'" Mr. Levin recalls. Mr. Elson replies, 'The board had been seriously misled by prior management.' Sunbeam ultimately restated 18 months of earnings and filed for bankruptcy protection." [12]

       "Paid-for research firms typically follow tiny, little-known companies the big brokerage firms ignore. Without them, there likely would be no research reports at all on these companies. Critics of paid-for research say it is less reliable, because an analyst could be influenced to be more bullish or bearish in his or her report, depending on who pays for it. Others note that paid-for research isn't that different from companies paying credit-rating firms that assess their debt. ... The full reports include disclosure information about potential conflicts of interest. ... Those who can access the full reports and read the fine-print disclosures will see that.... Some say the paid-for research isn't that different from other reports. 'Really, on a very basic level, what research isn't paid for?' says Todd Essary, chief executive of Investrend Research, member of a consortium of about 15 paid-for research firms...." [13]

        "If there ever were a bell-ringer that the market's recent giddiness appeared likely to end, it was Prudential Equity Group analyst Howard Penney's recommendation of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts Inc. after the market's close on Oct. 26. … Here was a company that hadn't filed quarterly reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission for more than two years; its most recently filed annual reportin Aprilwas more than a year out of date. … Mr. Penney not only initiated coverage on the stock with the equivalent of a buy, but gave it a target of nearly double its price." [14]

        "Crazy Eddie is hardly the first stock to confound securities analysts. But in this case, Crazy Eddie's founder, Eddie Antar, himself has inspired much of their bullishness. His ability impressed them, and he was their principal source within the company. Yet, while the public was buying Crazy Eddie shares, Mr. Antar sold them -- heavily. ... Thornton L. O'Glove, publisher of an institutional research report called Quality of Earnings, was the first to sound a cautionary note. In November, he warned that Crazy Eddie's inventories were bulging in relation to its sales -- an indication of pressure on earnings. Ms. Chadwick says she and other money managers, enamored of Crazy Eddie's expansion, paid no attention." [15] "But that is the nature of such tricksters: they appear bright, articulate, sincere and likable. Barry Minkow [ZZZZ Best] was certainly that--and much more. ... What made Minkow believable was his verbal ability." [16]  

       "Here are examples of how Mr. [Thornton L.] O'Glove works: … -- Focusing on Wedtech Corp., the Bronx defense contractor that collapsed late last year after selling a $75 million junk-bond issue, Mr. O'Glove says he spotted a big problem in the bond prospectus. He saw that for the first half of 1986, the gap between income reported for tax purposes and that reported to shareholders had jumped to 15 cents a share from only one cent a share a year before. 'I figured that the company was using more liberal accounting to recognize bigger profits from long-term contracts,' says Mr. O'Glove. 'Income reported for tax purposes is generally closer to real cash income than book income reported to shareholders.'"  [17]

       "Millennials and members of Gen Z prefer to seek financial advice from each other than from parents or from financial professionals. They don't like overwhelming spreadsheets … written in seemingly foreign languages. … Skepticism of experts and criticism of financial institutions is especially common among millennials and Gen Z…." (WSJ, 12/9/23, "What Your Friends Can Teach You About Money --- Millennials and Gen Z are turning to peers, not professionals. They don't trust banks and are tired of information overload.")


[1] NYT, 6/12/16, "How Donald Trump Bankrupted His Atlantic City Casinos, but Still Earned Millions"

[2] NYT, 3/6/91, "Dismissed in Trump Case, Analyst Is Awarded $750,000"

[3] Bloomberg News, 2/18/16, "Ex-Deutsche Bank analyst banned over rating at odds with opinion"

[4] NYT, 5/15/08, "Merrill Tries to Temper the Pollyannas in Its Ranks"

[5] WSJ, Bookshelf, 4/23/08, "The Money Kept Vanishing"

[6] NYT, 4/20/08, "Some Mutual Fund Numbers Look Great, but for Whom?"

[7] BusinessWeek, 7/27/07, "Analysts and CEOs: A Love Story?"

[8] WSJ, 7/14/07, "After an Analyst's 'Sell' Call, Nautilus Flexes Its Muscles"

[9] WSJ, 6/2/07, "An Eye-Poke to Investors Who Ignore the Small Print"

[10] NYT, 5/13/07, "Surprised? Maybe You Shouldn't Be"

[11] NYT, 5/12/07, "Making Sure The Negative Can Be Heard"

[12] WSJ, 3/19/07, "More Outside Directors Taking Lead in Crises"

[13] WSJ, 12/13/06, "In Quiet Niche, Paid-For Stock Research Persists"

[14] WSJ, 11/4/06, "What's Behind Sugary Report On Krispy Kreme? "

[15] WSJ, 7/1/87, "Analysts Who Liked Crazy Eddie Stock No Longer Beat the Drums for Retailer"

[16] Journal of Accountancy, 8/01, "Irrational Ratios"

[17] WSJ, 8/4/87, "By the Numbers: How One Analyst Scores Big by Finding the Dark Side"

 

An Approach to Stock Investing

 

 

        The stock market investing strategy mentioned here is founded on the belief that there is a direct link between the accuracy and reliability of a company's financial statements and the eventual performance of its publicly-traded securities in the market. "This study tests whether there is evidence supporting the claims of fundamental analysts to be able to forecast deteriorating firm performance. We also test whether the information in the analysts' research reports is impounded into the market price of subject firms at the date of the report. The evidence supports the claims that the analysts are able to anticipate deteriorating firm performance. That is, we find the firms identified by the analysts have deteriorating firm performance in the year following the report. … Central to our interpretation of the results is the claim of the analysts associated with the CFRA use only publicly available information to generate their research reports. With that caveat noted, we conclude that fundamental analysis can be used to detect signals of deteriorating firm performance, and that these signals in publicly available data are not priced by the market." [1] "In conclusion, we have been able to confirm that accounting information can be used to determine market performance of a stock. … The implications of this study have yielded the fact that investors can earn abnormal returns simply by looking at and analyzing accounting information and ratios." [2]

        "Financial markets reflect investors' expectations about the future...." [3] "Valuations and fundamentals tend to be closely related over time…." [4] However, that may not always be true. "Ultimately, a company that trades on the stock market is worth whatever investors decide it is worth. There is no fundamental value to which everything must return. That's in part because the future is uncertain." [5] You be the judge.  

        "[V]alue investing ... is actually valuing businessesthe way a private investor values them on cash flows and expected cash flowsand then trying to buy them at a discount to what those cash flows are worth. ... [T]wo or three years is enough time for the market to recognize the value of a business.... [M]ost people don't have the ability to value businesses at a discount and the discipline to hold them." [6]  

        During those times when the stock market is rational, investors may use stock screeners, locatable through web searches and/or available through securities brokerage firms where they maintain accounts, to find potential investment opportunities. Successful investors employ various search criteria, e.g., EV/EBITDA, LFCF/EV, PEG, ROIC, Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, Price/Operating-Cash-Flow and/or Price/Book Value ratios. There will be few, if any, candidates near market topsof course, depending how conservative one's specified search criteria. Using HAv2.3, one can determine whether favorable search results were produced by a company's manipulative accounting and/or unsound management practices. (A short-seller might view companies with manipulative accounting and/or unsound management practices, where its stock is reaching new highs, as an investment opportunity.) However, "[c]omputer screening has become very popular.... When everyone starts doing something, the method cannibalizes itself—it loses whatever edge it might once have had." [7] The key is to know what criteria to use in one's searches.

        Investing requires a strategic approach that involves carefully evaluating opportunities. It is prudent to exercise discretion and not engage in every opportunity that comes along. For instance, it is advisable to steer clear of companies that display stagnant growth and financial instability. "[T]he threat of zombies — companies that struggle to service their debt … that are technically insolvent but avoid collapse — is real. … In financial statements, that's reflected as an interest coverage ratio of under one. … [T]he basic concept is the same: They are allowed to keep walking in the hope that life may return to them someday. … [T]here's an 85% chance of zombie companies staying zombies in the following year, up from about 70% in the late 1980s." [8]

        Timing is always an issue. Remember "the perennial December ritual of 'window dressing.' ... [B]ad losers for the year-to-date can take a final pounding as the calendar comes to a close. ... A manager [] may systematically purge the portfolio of its worst losers. 'You don't want to look like a doofus holding stocks that did poorly,' say Felix Meschke, a finance professor at the University of Kansas. ... [I]t probably is a good time to pounce on beaten-down stocks you like. Funds ditch their losers so ferociously this time of year ... that these stocks tend to recover in early January when the selling abates." [9] And, individual shareholders may sell in late December for tax-loss purposes. "The Leuthold Group chief investment strategist [Jim Paulsen] believes Wall Street panic is in its later stages. 'We're getting close to the bottom,' Paulsen said, adding that it appears negative sentiment is 'getting close to burning out.' … 'It's OK maybe to start leaning in and buying some of these things that people are starting to give away,' Paulsen said." [10]  

       Sometimes, patience is necessary when no investment candidate meets the selection criteria. "[David] Einhorn's admirers point to the decline of value investing and the rise of quants, ETFs, index funds, and momentum stocks as the main reasons he hasn't done well. That is no doubt part of the story. But there's another way to look at it: By sticking to his value investing paradigm, and refusing to buy stocks of companies whose prices are above a certain multiple of discounted cash flow, or other value metrics, Einhorn's stock picks are limited. As a result, 'David has found himself with a lot of lower-quality businesses because he wouldn't pay up,' says an individual close to Greenlight [Capital]." [11]

       "For value investors, the 'buy' decision, at the outset, may seem to be the most difficult call to make. We peruse thousands of companies, hone down the list to a manageable number based on the fundamental criteria we find most compelling, and ultimately probably pull the trigger on just a handful over the course of a given year. We hope that our analysis was not flawed, that we did not miss something material, or that we did not paint an overly optimistic picture of the sometimes-distressed situations we gravitate toward. We do not expect instant gratification; some situations take years to play out. That's an eternity these days, but we are just wired that way, patient until the end, and sometimes to our detriment. We have to be careful about not falling in love with an idea; that can blind us to the truth, lead to wishful thinking, and cause us to hang on to a name far too long. The harder part, in my view, may be when to close a position. This is especially true when it plays out much quicker than you'd anticipated. When you are buying damaged turnaround plays, as I often do, you are usually early to the party, buying shares the growth crowd is selling at distressed prices. If you are correct, the name turns around and/or the market realizes that it overly punished the name, and investors begin to plow back in. At that point, you may be faced with a decision, sometimes more quickly than anticipated. Being early to the party sometimes means that you are also among the first to leave, selling a name that has rebounded while it is still enjoying the momentum of renewed interest. That's something I've come to accept as a value investor; if you make money on a trade after deciding to close the position, you need to walk away and not look back. All of the above perfectly describes my position in Fossil Group Inc. (FOSL), which I took in January in the mid-$8 range. I never set de-facto price targets; I may have an idea of what I think a company is worth when I purchase it, but don't have a hard and fast rule. In Fossil's case, I believed it was potentially a double, but not a quick one. Just five months later, Fossil is up nearly 300% thanks to some initial takeover speculation in February that drove shares to $17, then a KeyBanc research report early this month that put a $32 price target on the stock. With decision time for me, I closed the position this week. It was not an easy one to make, nor was it the only option. I could have sold a portion of the position, played the trailing stop-loss game, utilized options, or a combination of the three. Instead, I decided to take the money and run and look for the next one. I again may be a bit early to leave the party, but that's OK. Situations rarely unfold this quickly in value land, and it's a good outcome no matter what." [12] FOSL's market price subsequently tumbled back to low single digits.

        "'Make sure you don't get killed on the downside," he (Hersh Cohen, chief investment officer of ClearBridge Advisors, a Legg Mason subsidiary) said. ... Mr. Cohen has managed the Legg Mason Partners Appreciation fund for 30 years, over which he has beaten the S. & P. 500.... Last year was 'the worst in my career in 40 years of managing funds,' Mr. Cohen said. ... Mr. Cohen focuses on companies with 'superior balance sheets'.... Mr. Cohen holds a doctorate in psychology—a background he calls most helpful in 'market extremes.'  He says he tries 'to act on extremes—but to act the other way,' cutting back when the market is euphoric, and increasing his bets when others panic 'and stuff is being given away.'" [13]

        What if your analysis is wrong? "A mind is a terrible thing to change. ... [O]ur own mind acts like a compulsive yes-man who echoes whatever you want to believe. Psychologists call this mental gremlin the 'confirmation bias.' ...[P]eople are twice as likely to seek information that confirms what they already believe as they are to consider evidence that would challenge those beliefs. Why is a mind-made-up so hard to penetrate? ... So how can you counteract confirmation bias? Gary Klein, a psychologist at Applied Research Associates, of Albuquerque, N.M., recommends imagining that you have looked into a crystal ball and have seen that your investment has gone bust. Next, come up with the most compelling explanations you can find for the failure. This exercise ... can help you realize that your beliefs mightn't be as solid as you thought. Try estimating the odds that your analysis is wrong. ... This way, if the investment does go awry, you will be less likely to dig in your analytical heels and desperately try to prove that you are still right." [14]

        "Famed economist Paul Samuelson once said: 'Investing should be more like watching paint dry or watching grass grow. If you want excitement, take $800 and go to Las Vegas.' That's not to say investing can't be exciting; it's an amazing feeling to watch the positive effects on your portfolio after an investment thesis comes to fruition. Mr. Samuelson, however, had a point: If you think investing is like gambling, you're doing it wrong. ... [Y]our investments should allow you to sleep peacefully." [15]    

        After conducting a thorough evaluation of the company, including factors such as financial stability and the likelihood of bankruptcy or fraudulent practices, an investor may consider increasing their investment at specified levels of decline. This strategy, known as "averaging-down" or incrementally purchasing undervalued stocks that are believed to be sufficiently stable to withstand financial difficulties and eventually regain value, can be financially lucrative. However, it is important to note that successfully implementing this approach requires emotional resilience, patience, and adequate financial resources. In certain cases, investors who employ an averaging-down strategy may ultimately experience greater profits compared to those who attempt to predict the lowest point of a stock's price through an initial purchase. Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that averaging-down can be emotionally challenging, particularly when significant paper losses have already been incurred. There are risks. "A big sum of money rivets your attention and can fill you with fear of doing the wrong thing….  So parcel out big decisions into smaller pieces. Put money to work in equal increments over time….That should minimize the regret you might feel from investing either too much at the wrong time or too little at the right time." [16]

      Opinions differ as to the merits of averaging-down. "Why are some investors turning rashly bullish during the worst bear market in decades? It is the financial equivalent of a 'Hail Mary pass'the desperate attempt, far from the goal line and late in a losing game, to fling the football as hard and as high as you can, hoping it will somehow come down for a score and wipe out your deficit. If you fixate on the money you already have lost, you may feel that a moderate future gain can only reduce those losses, making it hardly worth seeking at all. On the other hand, even the slightest chance of striking it rich holds out something precious: hope. That emotion can elbow aside the fact that most Hail Mary passes fail, in the stadium and stock market alike. … Just as most football coaches would never call for a Hail Mary pass unless the game clock is running out, investors may be feeling the urge to gamble only now that it seems there is no other way to recover losses. … Every once in a while, they win big; far more often, they lose. … Hurling your money at the wildest risks you can find is a bad bet. The best way to recover is by gritting your teeth and grinding out gains one slow, boring play at a time. You aren't likely to rebuild your wealth through an act of desperation; recovery is a process, not an event. Leave the Hail Mary play where it belongs: on the football field." [17] But is it "the wildest risk"? "Fixating on your underperformance may lead to what psychologists call loss chasing, or taking bigger, more frequent and more-impulsive risks in the effort to get back to break-even. That doesn't necessarily mean buying more of whatever's gone down the most. Often, it means buying whatever you think can go up the most -- even (or especially) if it's a long shot. Neuroscience experiments have shown that choosing to quit chasing your losses can fire up the same part of the brain that registers pain and disgust. When you hunt what you hope will be gains, it hurts to admit that what you're likely to catch is more losses. No wonder it can be hard to stop this behavior -- even if you realize your persistent bad bets are putting you deeper in the hole." [18]

        One should continually monitor one's investments by setting alerts at News.Google.com and SeekingAlpha, and, at the least, annually update prior HAv2.3 analyses with the most-recent SEC Form 10-K data. One can currently obtain a free subscription to SEC Filings (www.secfilings.com) to obtain filing alerts. "Americans caught up in Enronphobia this year are embracing the practice of studying corporations' annual reports, also known as 10Ks. ... Spotting the next Enron Corp. before its stock plummets can be daunting for a novice, and even for professional investors, who wade through hundreds of pages of small print that 10Ks typically contain." [19] "Don't blame Wall Street analysts, rank-and-file investors and journalists for failing to read corporate earnings reports from beginning to end. For one thing, the quarterly and annual reports churned out by publicly traded companies are forbiddingly long. … For another, their prose is often dreary and repetitious.  … It's the financial figures within these pages that are critically important. … [W]e've been making a mistake. The turgid language in these dull corporate reports is actually sprinkled with important clues about major problems — and there is a way to get an inkling about them without actually having to read every word. … [W]hen the language in the current text varies a great deal from previous versions, it frequently signals trouble that will become evident several months later. … Mr. [Lauren] Cohen [of Harvard Business School] said in an interview. 'It turned out that when there are a lot of changes, there's a good chance that something important is going on, and most of the time, it's negative.' …  Textual changes in the 'risk factors' section were most likely to predict subsequent moves in share prices. … The overwhelming majority — 86 percent — of reports with substantial wording changes were primarily negative in tone. … Professor Cohen … suggested two things: First, always download the previous version of a corporate report as well as the current version, so you can compare the language. Focus on the differences from year to year. Second, focus on one section, the 'risk factors section.' … The linguistic clues were another piece of evidence that needed to be evaluated and, perhaps, bolstered, by other research. … [U]ntil the 'Lazy Prices' research is widely understood, it may be possible for some investors to profit from it." [20] It seems so easy in theory. How does one determine the practical meaning of "varies a great deal" and "a lot of changes"? Changes are just "another piece of evidence." Stick with a thorough analysis of the numbers.

        One might exit an investmentat a profit or a lossif and when HAv2.3 indicates unreasonably high valuations and/or developing financial stress and/or mismanagement. Some costly mistakes have been made by ignoring HAv2.3's red-flags. "[M]ost people are better attuned to buying than selling. It's especially hard to part with stocks that have had a stellar performance. ... [T]he highest price-to-growth (PEG) ratios, which are often indicators of over-valued stocks. A high PEG suggests that the price is high relative to the expected earnings; a PEG over 4 is a warning sign. ... PEG ratios are hardly infallible guides to future performance.... But they do provide an objective measure of valuation, rather than relying on your gut feelings." [21] "If you want to bail out, you have to do so on the way up and not worry about missing the peak." [22] Unlike averaging-down, our experience has shown that, when liquidating, it is best to liquidate the entire position. Otherwise, one might be tempted to average-down another time if the stock's price declines again. Bernard Baruch noted, "I made my money by selling too soon."

        After-action reports are imperative, whether there was a profit or loss. "Robert A. Olstein says that he was not surprised by the recent wave of corporate accounting scandals. ... 'It ebbs and flows, and in a bull market, as valuations grow, so do imaginations and creativity,' said said Mr. Olstein ... who runs the $1.4 billion Olstein Financial Alert fund.... Mr. Olstein is so focused on balance sheet analysis that he refuses to meet with company management for fear of being influenced. ... His newfound skepticism took root in the Quality of Earnings Report, a newsletter he founded with Thornton O'glove, another analyst, in 1970. The newsletter scrutinized company balance sheets and often warned subscribers about problems." [23] "Olstein sold his entire position in ... the company.... He also reexamined SEC filings and newspaper reports to learn whether he missed any warning signals. ... 'There was enough evidence on the table to say that we were too optimistic...' he said. 'It was right in my face. We autopsy every error we make to see if there is any message other than we got hit by a bomb." [24] There is evidence that Olstein's firm does not rely exclusively on financial screens in its stock-selection process. "Among the recent stocks to make the cut: Federated Department Stores (FD), which he began studying as a results of a Barron's article." [25]  

        Emotions  

        "The 'strong hands' have what it takes to survive.... Not only are they emotionally strong enough to avoid selling into a panic, but they also have deep-enough pockets to avoid doing so for financial reasons. In fact, the 'strong hands' can actually profit by buying at cheap prices near the bottom of a market." [26]  "Value investors are known for buying low and selling high, but some big-name mutual-fund managers who thought they bought low are now selling far lower and are posting big losses...." [27]

        "Emotions are contrarian indicators.... [O]ne of the toughest feelings to fight is the urge to take a profit...." [28] "[P]eople tend to hang on to their losing stocks too long and sell their winners too early." [29] One should set a target profit-level-selling price when making a purchase. After averaging down, one's patience could reach a breaking point when a depressed stock finally rises only to one's breakeven price. Furthermore, one must learn to control one's greed and exit the investment at a reasonable profit. For example, after the market price of FOSL rapidly rose from less than $10 to near $32 per share, its market price plummeted back down to the $3 area (4/3/20).

         "To be a value investor, it isn't enough to buy cheap stocks.... You have to stick around until the market recognizes their worth. Mr. (Jean-Marie) Eveillard, now 73 years old ... is prepared to 'suffer' until the market proves him right." [30] "Value investors like Ms. (Kim) Forrest hunt for stocks of companies that are under appreciated and undervalued. It is an approach championed by Warren Buffett and many other bargain hunters. But a low share price isn't the same thing as a good value, particularly if the weakness reflects some fundamental problem facing a company or its industry. Investors who conflate the two may be succumbing to a common desire to buy cheaper stocks in order to avoid overpaying, says Meir Statman, a finance professor at Santa Clara University in California. It is similar to the impulse that compels investors to cling to stocks they already own that have declined in price, he says. Research suggests that is a bad strategy, Mr. Statman says, because stocks that have gone down over the past six months to a year are more likely to keep going down for roughly the same amount of time. 'Usually, losers continue to lose,' he adds. ... 'Don't expect these things to shoot up in 2013,' says Fort Pitt Capital's Ms. Forrest. She thinks it could take three to five years for some laggards to rebound. That could pay off for investors who have lots of patience. But many investors are more like 'hyperactive kindergartners playing musical chairs,' says Sam Stovall, chief equity strategist at S&P Capital IQ. 'They don't have the patience.' ... 'A lot of investors have been waiting for a strong correction,' Mr. Stovall says. If that happens, the stocks that have climbed the most this year could skid, he says—but the same stocks are the most likely to bounce back strongly if investors see the slide as a buying opportunity. Rather than buying up laggards, Mr. Stovall says, the appropriate response to this year's rally may be to 'let your winners run and cut your losers short.''' [31]

        "Call it the consumer's Catch 22: Buyers love bargains, but when they finally arrive—thanks to a financial crisis—many feel too cash-strapped to take advantage of them. ... Valuation—always a tricky affair—becomes even more challenging in turbulent times. For example, traditional measures based on earnings multiples are less meaningful when profits are erratic, or nonexistent." [32] As John Maynard Keynes famously put it: "The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent." "The technical term for it is 'negative feedback loop.' The rest of us just call it a panic. How else to explain yet another plunge in the stock market Tuesday that sent the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index to its lowest level in five years—particularly in the absence of another nasty surprise? ... Anybody searching for cause-and-effect logic in the daily gyrations of the market will be disappointed—even if the overarching problem of a crisis of confidence in the global economy is now becoming clear. Instead, the market has become a case study in the psychology of crowds, many experts say.  In normal times, it runs on a healthy mix of fear and greed. But fear now seems to rule, with investors often exhibiting a Wall Street version of the fight-or-flight mechanism—they are selling first, and asking questions later. ... To some, signs of capitulation can be read as an indicator that the bottom may be near. Indeed, Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at Standard & Poor's Equity Research, is among those who say the market may be close to a bottom. ... The opposite of capitulation, of course, is investing at the height of a bubble. ... At this point, any spreadsheet analysis of underlying and intrinsic values of stocks becomes meaningless, and concern for preserving wealth overrides the desire to grow it—what some may call greed." [33]

        "Five years ago, the global financial system was falling apart. … [Some] saw the buying opportunity of a lifetime. … Much attention has been lavished on the speculators who reaped huge paydays betting against the subprime mortgages that stoked the financial crisis. Doomsayers like the hedge fund manager John Paulson and the cast of characters in 'The Big Short,' the Michael Lewis book, saw calamity coming, and their contrarian bets delivered when the housing market collapsed. But what about the big long? During the dark days of late 2008, while other investors dumped their holdings or sat paralyzed on the sidelines, who decided that it was time to put money on the line? Who bought low and then sold high? … But a number of other, lower-profile financiers also made billions by obeying one of Mr. [Warren E.] Buffett's favorite aphorisms: 'Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful.' … Each of these bottom-of-the-market wagers offers enduring investment lessons. …But during the frenzied fall of 2008, the uncertainty was so great that most investors were immobilized by fear.  If they waited too long in such a tumultuous market, the opportunity could pass…. As the stock rose, [they] took profits by methodically selling [their] stake. … Though [they] left several billion dollars on the table by unloading shares as they traded higher, [they] defended the sales as prudent risk management.  Howard Marks's memos to his Oaktree clients have a cult like following among the professional-investing cognoscenti. … The dispatches—as well as a book, 'The Most Important Thing'—harp on recurring themes: the paramount importance of price, the danger of hubris, the value of contrarianism, the inevitability of cycles. …'Either this is the greatest buying opportunity of my career or the world is going to end,' … 'And if it ends, our clients will have much bigger problems on their hands.' … Clients grew anxious. Calls began streaming in to check Oaktree's performance. In October, Mr. Marks tapped out another memo to assuage them. 'Our assets are declining in value like everything else, but we're comfortable that we're doing exactly what you hired us to do,' he wrote. 'We're grabbing at falling knives. The best bargains are always found in frightening environments.' … For months, Oaktree continued to lose money. Mr. Marks tried to reassure his clients, saying it was inevitable that they would be buying on the way down, that even the most experienced investors couldn't pinpoint when the market would stop dropping. Looking back … if had he waited until March 2009, the eventual market nadir, Oaktree would not have been able to invest as much as it did. By then, all of the hysterical selling had run its course, and there were fewer bonds to buy. … Mr. Marks has also contemplated a new book. His theme? How to identify market cycles and the pendulum swings of investor psychology. Today, he sees the markets as neither dangerously expensive nor extraordinarily cheap. He sees some signs of excessive risk-taking, but also sees continued uncertainty. As a result of the muddy outlook, Oaktree is investing with caution. For Mr. Marks, it's easier to know what to do at the extremes than it is in the middle. 'Moments like 2008 will continue to present great opportunities for as long as emotion rules the markets,' Mr. Marks said. 'In other words, forever.'" [34]     

        Leverage

        "You could've been highly leveraged.... Leverage may turbo-charge results on the way up, but it's crushing on the way down." [35] "When you leverage, you use someone else's money to amplify an investment's gains—and its losses. The word comes from the French lever, to lift up. If you've ever used a lever to move a heavy object, you know the force is amazingly powerful—and potentially dangerous. Borrowing might be a basic human urge. Neuroscientists have found that buying on credit activates the same region of the brain that anticipates the next hit from an addictive drug. Wall Street's shorthand for "other people's money," OPM, does sound a bit like opium. Because borrowing pumps up profits in a rising market, it can make investors cockier, goading them into taking greater risk. … [I]nexperienced traders using borrowed money have driven asset prices far above their fundamental value. … Investing with somebody else's money is at least 3,700 years old.  … Using credit can contribute to the downfall of even the most sophisticated investors. Consider Long-Term Capital Management, the hedge fund that imploded in 1998 and nearly took the global financial system with it. Launched in 1994 by experienced quantitative traders in partnership with two Nobel laureates in economics, LTCM often leveraged at least 20-to-1, borrowing roughly $100 for every $5 of its own money." [36]  

        "Market downturns 'offer extraordinary opportunities to those who are not handicapped by debt,' [Warren Buffett] says, which brings up another important investing lesson: Never borrow money to buy stocks. 'There is simply no telling how far stocks can fall in a short period,' writes Buffett. 'Even if your borrowings are small and your positions aren't immediately threatened by the plunging market, your mind may well become rattled by scary headlines and breathless commentary. And an unsettled mind will not make good decisions.'" [37] "[W]hen the fear system of the brain is active, exploratory activity and risk-taking are turned off. The first order of business, then, is to neutralize that system. This means not being a fear monger. It means avoiding people who are overly pessimistic about the economy. It means tuning out media that fan emotional flames. ... [I]t means closing the Web page with the market ticker. It does mean being prepared, but not being a hyper vigilant, everyone-in-the-bunker type." [38] "Ignore the pundits. The more the market falls, the wilder the predictions get. ... But the truth is, none of these folks really know [sic] where stocks are headed." [39] "[M]ost retail investors rush into the market at the top and bail out at the bottom." (Registered Representative, 9/09, "The 0% Return") "Experts say amateur investors tend to make two basic mistakes: they are swayed by emotion, and assume that recent performance will predict the future. ... 'Often, the best investments for the future are those that have been performing the worst,' Mr. [Stephen] Utkus [head of the Center for Retirement Research at Vanguard] said. Unfortunately, taking advantage of under pricing implies a contrarian style of investing that 'most of us aren't emotionally equipped to handle,' he said." [40]

        Retail Stocks

        Usually, stocks of retailers, e.g., consumer discretionary, do not have complex financial statements. "Put simply, hot, trendy retailing companies go up, hit a wall, and go down. That's it. If you are the kind of person who can stomach that—as … an investor—more power to you. Otherwise you would do well to seek other vehicles. (A hedge fund manager once told me that retail stocks are just shorts … waiting to happen.)" [41] "Retail stocks have taken a beating in recent years. … [A]re retail stocks a viable option? They could be if you look at the right companies. … One of the appealing things about retail investing is that, for many investors, it fits the criteria of 'buying what you know.' … Another related point is that investing in retail stocks requires investors to put in the work to research individual stocks. This research should include (but should not be limited to) the fundamentals such as same-store sales, revenue growth, and net operating income. You should also be familiar with what analysts are saying about the company's valuation using ratios such as P/E, PEG, and P/S. Investors should also pay attention to the latest news about the company including news about earnings reports, store openings/closures and/or product launches. And if that weren't enough, investors need to keep an eye on the competition. If this sounds like a lot of work, then maybe investing is not right for you. Finally, retail investing is not for the faint of heart. Retail stocks frequently move in extremes to the market. "Small companies are individually more volatile ... given the lack of Wall Street analyst coverage many small companies receive." (WSJ, 10/10/23, These Stocks Are Screaming Recession. It's Almost Time to Buy Them. Small-capitalization stocks can supercharge portfolios on the other side of economic downturn") With HAv2.3, you become your own "Wall Street analyst," and volatility means opportunity. When the economy, and the market, are going well retail stocks may significantly outperform the market. But when the economy starts to lag, retail stocks can significantly under perform the market. … [E]ven if you buy the right retail stocks, you have to be committed to them. This means having realistic growth expectations and being willing to hold onto the stocks when the going gets rough." [42] HAv2.3 would have forewarned those invested in Bed, Bath & Beyond (BBBY) stock of BBBY's financial perils as early as April 2015 when BBBY shares trader at an all-time-high price.  

           February - April 2020

        "One study of 178 adults, published in 2013 by the department of organizational behavior at the business school Insead, in Singapore, and the Wharton School, at the University of Pennsylvania, showed that 15-minute sessions of mindfulness can help overcome the sunk-cost fallacy—the tendency to stick with a failing project because of the time, effort or money already invested in it. For traders, that means holding on to, or doubling down on, losing positions." [43]

        "The best-performing stock of the past 30 years … [is] little-known Jack Henry &Associates Inc. …  [T]o earn such superior long-term results, you have to withstand bone-cracking short-term downdrafts along the way—something most fund managers can't do. …Among the top 10 stocks over the past three decades … [some] suffered interim declines of at least 75%.... To end up earning hundreds of times your original investment, you would have had to lose at least three-quarters of your money along the way. …  Surely only a professional investor can withstand that kind of pain? Au contraire, says Mr. [David] Salem: 'It's potentially career-ending for a manager to hold such big interim losers. I wonder if any manager has ever been able to stay the entire course with stocks like these.' … For all the talk about how individual investors have faded as a market force, results like Jack Henry's are a reminder that no other constituency is in a better position to buy and hold…and hold…and hold. No one can fire you for hanging onto a stock that loses 75% or more; you are free to seek value in the most obscure companies or to find hope in the darkest hour." [44] "Professional investors tend to move the fastest when a market suddenly turns. That's largely out of self-preservation, because the biggest risk they face is being so out of step with the market that their clients fire them. ... Patience is a luxury that individual investors can afford. ... The pros are in a never ending struggle to attract new funds." [45] The corollary is you need to be able to analyze a financial statement and wait for institutional managers to run.

        "It has been swift, and it's been deep, but we're not quite at the point where it's just indiscriminate blood-letting all over the place. … [P]eople have been conditioned in a very Pavlovian sense—every time they've sold, they've been made to look stupid by a V-shaped recovery shortly afterwards. … Pros are now petrified of missing the market recovery. That could shift as the losses pile up and enough time goes by. … What if you sell, stocks bounce back, and [in] the end clients say, 'That's the last straw!' on their way out the door? … [W]e might be witnessing the first ever case of 'Panic Holding' in the stock market."  [46] "Indiscriminate blood-letting" arrived two weeks later.

        "Markets are usually driven by greed or fear. On mercifully rare occasions, they are driven by outright panic. … When panic rules the roost, markets can be governed more by the perceived health of the institutions operating in them than by a rational understanding of economic developments. In such circumstances, margin calls can spark sell offs even in assets generally judged to be safe— gold is a recent case in point —and the prices of risk assets can fall far further than coolheaded assessments of their fundamental value would suggest." [47]  

        "Investing, now more than ever, is about controlling the controllable. You can't control the markets. … You can control your own behavior, although that requires making accurate, honest predictions about yourself. Controlling the controllable … means putting some calm and serious thought into what is within your power. Your future success may depend … on spending a few quiet minutes figuring out who you are as an investor. …[Y]ou need to be able to tell, in advance, how bad you will feel if your decisions turn out to be wrong.  … At the most basic level, those are the two potential regrets most investors face: the risk of losing massive amounts of money … versus the risk of missing out on what could be a robust rebound…. Only by creating a circle of calm around yourself can you honestly evaluate which type of regret is likely to bother you more down the road. … [S]ee what you did the last time markets were in meltdown. If you bought or stood pat as the U.S. stock market dropped more than 55% between October 2007 and March 2009, you're a good candidate to be able to weather this downdraft, too, without panicking. … Also, regrets tend to be hotter and more painful when an outcome appears to be caused by your own actions rather than circumstances that seem beyond your control. Regret is also more intense when you take an action that is an unusual departure from your normal pattern. So taking small actions over time, rather than making a big drastic decision all at once, should help reduce your future regrets regardless of what the markets do from here. … [I]f the market collapse makes you want to buy stocks … [n]ibble in equal amounts over the course of weeks or months. Above all, small steps are the best way to avoid big regrets." [48]  

        "These are the moments smart investors are supposed to prepare for, to be ready to snap up bargains from others desperate to flee the market at any price. …  Investors with the strength of will to ignore the volatility need only find assets where they are confident that there is little risk of permanent loss to make money in the long run.  Assessing that risk of permanent loss needs three big judgments. … The third judgment: Can companies survive even without help? …  What is important is having enough cash to avoid going bust before the economy rebounds, and to cover a period in case a recession is deep enough to feed on itself. Chuck out earnings forecasts, and look at debt costs, wages, and access to credit lines. Strong balance sheets mean survival, which is vital to avoid permanent loss. Then there is the question of timing. Long term investors should forget it, and just buy where they think they can avoid permanent loss. … Selling safe-haven assets and risky assets at the same time, as we saw this week, is a classic sign of investor capitulation. It shows a rush into the ultimate safety of cash as fear overwhelms any prospect of return. Anything that can be sold, is sold. Unfortunately that doesn't guarantee prices can't fall even further….  Still, stocks have now fallen a very long way, very quickly. It is a great time to be looking for bargains—but only for those willing and able to hold on through what could be some very troubled times." [49]

        "It isn't just your portfolio that's getting pounded. You are, too. Every financial asset is falling at once, and the economy itself seems to be imploding. All investors—individuals and professionals alike—need to understand the havoc this kind of stress wreaks on the human brain. … A market crash is always scary, but this time the fear and panic of huge daily drops are compounded by the dread and uncertainty of a global pandemic. … [S]tress intensifies the negative. … 'It overwhelms the knowledge that we don't need to be doing that.'" [50]

        "[H]indsight bias [is] the belief, after something happens, that we foresaw that it would occur. That intuition keeps you from learning from mistakes, leads you to pay too much attention to unreliable forecasts and makes you mismeasure your tolerance for risk. … [L]earning what did happen impedes you from retrieving what you thought would happen. … [T]rack your own forecasts. … [Keep] an investment diary during the financial crisis, go back and read it. How accurately did you predict how far stocks would drop and how long they would take to recover?" [51]

        "The true contrarian only buys when it makes him feel physically sick to press the buy key. … Does that mean it's time to buy? The standard contrarian approach says it is. Panic is visible everywhere. … Faced with all this, it's easy for an investor to be paralyzed by fear. … Cheap stocks are increasingly being priced for failure…. So perhaps it's time to start buying in, accepting that picking the precise bottom is hard. Another 50% fall is possible…. But for the long-term investor, being seriously scared should be a reason to buy—not that knowing makes it any easier." [52]

        "'Nothing relieves anxiety more than taking action," [Frank Murtha, a managing partner of the consulting firm MarketPysch and an expert in behavioral finance] said. 'You can take small actions that address the emotional need to do something without putting your finances at undue risk.' Stocks are one of the few assets that psychologically become harder to buy as they become cheaper. … Even he missed the great buying opportunity in March 2009, 'I was too scared,' he said." [53]

        "In the coronavirus pandemic, stock analysts have a new job: credit analysis. … Instead of asking how fast a company can grow, ever-optimistic equity analysts now have to answer a grimmer question: how long can it last if its revenue vanishes? This focus on cold, hard cash means they have to do work that is more familiar to credit analysts: analyzing available liquidity, looking at debt covenants and repayment schedules and checking the extent to which assets are unencumbered. … [I]nvestors overlooked credit health in the bull market.  … Now that balance sheets have taken center stage, traditional metrics like net debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization or even tangible book value are back in vogue. …  Analysts better acquainted with income statements need to pay closer attention to companies' balance sheets right now." [54]  

        "[L]osses hurt twice as much as gains feel good…. Such '[L]oss aversion' helps explain why a market correction can be so unpleasant that it leads to panic selling. We are wired to hate a portfolio full of red ink. … What should you do if … you appear to be hypersensitive to short-term losses? The most immediate thing you should do is not look at the market." [55]  


[1] Using Fundamental Analysis to Assess Earnings Quality: Evidence from the Center for Financial Research and Analysis [October 2000].

[2] Atanasov, Tyler, Using Accounting information to Forecast Market Performance (2017), pps. 14-15.

[3] Economist, 12/19/20, "What explains investors' enthusiasm for risky assets?"

[4] WSJ, 1/28/21, "How GameStop's Reddit-and-Options-Fueled Stock Rally Happened…."

[5] NYT, 2/1/21, "What Is GameStop, the Company, Really Worth? Does It Matter?"

[6] NYT, 10/7/19, "A Value Investor Defends Value Investing...."

[7] WSJ, 7/17/89, "Two Money Managers Duke It Out In Debate on Stock-Value Theories"

[8] Washington Post, 4/11/23, "Zombies Are Back! Here's Why That's Economic Trouble"

[9] WSJ, 12/24/11, "Now That's Performance Art"

[10] CNBC, 12/24/18, "Market panic enters late stages, sharp rebound coming soon, strategist Jim Paulsen says"

[11] Institutional Investor, 5/16/18, "What Exactly Happened to David Einhorn?"

[12] TheStreet.com, 6/22/18, "Fossil's Big Surge Doesn't Make Hard Call When to Take Profits Any Easier"

[13] NYT, 7/26/09, "Up 40%, but Still Feeling Down"

[14] WSJ, 11/13/09, "How to Ignore the Yes-Man in Your Head"

[15] Motley Fool, 11/13/12, "Beat the market and sleep well with this stock"

[16] WSJ, 8/27/21, "The Lazy Investor's Guide to Getting Stuff Done…."

[17] WSJ, 2/21/09, "The Intelligent Investor: As Stock Losses Loom, Don't Throw a 'Hail Mary"'

[18] WSJ, 5/20/23, "The Intelligent Investor: … Trying to make up for stock-market losses can be costly, impulsive and misguided…."

[19] WSJ, 4/8/02, "'Footnote Factor' Looms Large This Year --- As Annual Reports Arrive, Tricks Are Used to Find Any Enron-Like Items"

[20] NYT, 1/10/19, "How Companies Like Apple Sprinkle Secrets in Earnings Reports"

[21] WSJ, 8/12/09 WSJ, "A Time to Let Go Of Overvalued Stock"

[22] WSJ, 8/26/09, "How I Got Burned by Beanie Babies")

[23] WSJ, 7/6/03, "This Manager Keeps His Focus on the Balance Sheet"

[24] Washington Post, 4/10/05, "Taking the Plunge As Stocks Are Low...."

[25] Barron's, 2/20/06, "Smitten by the Unloved"

[26] NYT, 8/9/09, "Hold or Fold, but Don't Waver"

[27] WSJ, 8/30/08, "Value Investors Cut Losses"

[28] WSJ, 5/8/08, "If It Feels Bad, It's Probably Good ... the Best Trades Are Usually the Most Painful."

[29] WSJ, 6/3/97, "Who's Sorry Now? Folks Who Sold, Study Reports"

[30] WSJ, 2/16/13, "Value Stocks Are HotBut Most Investors Will Burn Out"

[31] WSJ, 5/25/13, "Beware of 'Bargain' StocksWhy a Low Share Price Alone Doesn't Make for a Good Value"

[32] NYT, 5/22/09, "The Art of Buying in Bearish Times"

[33] NYT, 10/8/08, "Forget Logic; Fear Appears to Have Edge"

[34] NYT, 11/9/13, "Treasure Hunters of the Financial Crisis"

[35] WSJ, 11/25/08, "A Reason to Be Thankful: It Could Have Been Worse"

[36] WSJ, 1/22/22, "The Force That Can Lift Stocks but Wreck You…."

[37] CNBC, 12/17/18, "Warren Buffett suggests you read this 19th century poem when the market is tanking"

[38] NYT, 12/7/08, "In Hard Times, Fear Can Impair Decision-Making"

[39] WSJ, 4/1/97, "Advice for Jittery Investors: Sit Tight"

[40] NYT, 9/22/09, "The Forest, the Trees and Your Portfolio"

[41] Fortune, 7/1/03, "Nautica's Big Mess The once-hip retail brand is losing customers, fighting with investors, and looking for a buyer."

[42] MarketBeat, 10/10/19, "Is Now a Good Time to Invest in Retail Stocks?"

[43] WSJ, 2/10/20, "A New Way for Stock Traders to Rebalance: Meditation; Some studies indicate that mindfulness leads to better investment performance"

[44] WSJ, 12/13/19, "How You Can Get Big Gains That Wall Street Can't; A dirty secret of the investment business is that fund managers don't buy and hold. Not because they don't want to, but because they can't."

[45] WSJ, 2/27/20, "Intelligent Investor: Pros Must Sell Stock Now. You Don't Have To"

[46] The Reformed Broker, 2/27/20, "Why it's 'an orderly sell-off'"

[47] WSJ, 3/9/20, "How to Keep Calm as Coronavirus Fears Turn Into Market Panic…."

[48] WSJ, 3/14/20, "Stocks Are in Chaos. Control the One Thing You Can. Whether the market goes up or down from here, it's time for an honest assessment about what you can do to minimize your regrets"

[49] WSJ, 3/14/20, "Take a Deep Breath and Assess Whether It Is Time to Buy; These are the moments smart investors are supposed to prepare for"

[50] WSJ, 3/19/20, "This Is Your Brain on a Crashing Stock Market; Fear and panic over huge daily drops are compounded by dread of a global pandemic"

[51] WSJ, 3/20/20, "The Panic of 2020? Oh, I Made a Ton of Money—and So Did You; Hindsight bias suggests that one day you'll look back on all of this and... lie"

[52] WSJ, 3/24/20," I'm Scared. That's a Reason to Buy. The true contrarian only buys when it makes him feel physically sick to press the buy key"

[53] NYT, 3/27/20, "I Became a Disciplined Investor Over 40Year. The Virus Broke Me in 40 Days."

[54] WSJ, 3/27/20, "Stock Analysts Now Need to Be Credit Analysts; Modeling growth and market size is out; understanding debt covenants and refinancing schedules is in"

[55] WSJ, 4/6/20, "Here's Why Some Investors Panic. And Here's How to Make Sure You Don't. Are you likely to buy high and sell low in a market panic? There's a pretty simple way to figure that out."

Financial Statements in the News

 

        "He and other executives improperly boosted profit by booking operating expenses as capital spending, which can be deducted from earnings in small chunks over time." [1]  

        "[There is] a growing group of companies turning to external assessments to fine-tune their communications. The target audience isn't just human analysts and investors: Machine-learning tools, perception studies and speech recognition are also used by finance and investor-relations executives seeking to anticipate the reaction of robots that increasingly sway the market by buying and selling shares on the basis of data analysis. …  These days, a lot of investors are using language-and sentiment-analysis tools, which means companies have to adjust how they talk about their finances…. Algorithmic traders using sentiment analysis—an automated process that identifies positive, negative and neutral opinions in a body of text—can react negatively to wording….  [Consultants] are pitching data-crunching software tools that they say can find signals in companies' public statements. … [One consultant] uses machine learning and natural language processing to create a lexicon of a company's commonly used words. This can help institutional investors get a better understanding of a company's tone and the potential implications. … [A r]ival software firm … has come up with a 'deception score' tool that warns investors when companies may be using evasive language, euphemisms or stalling tactics…. Behind the increased interest [by some companies is the] belief that calibrating their communications can boost their shares." [2] So, what value does this divining-rod substitute add to financial statement analysis? Further, admissions in Form 10-Ks appear years after the numbers predicted disaster.

        "Companies can have unconventional chief executives, but not eccentric accounting. Tesla, the electric-car maker, on Friday disclosed that its chief accounting officer had resigned and was leaving just weeks after his arrival. … The departure of Tesla's chief accounting officer, David Morton, may be particularly concerning for investors because of its unfortunate timing. ... But with the sudden exit of Mr. Morton, investors might now fret about the reliability of Tesla's financial statements. … Did he discover that his new working environment was difficult or in disarray? Was there something he was uncomfortable signing off on? Mr. Morton's predecessor, Eric Branderiz, left after 14 months." [3]  

        "In general, cases of major fraud should have been prevented by auditors, whose specific job it is to review every set of accounts as a neutral outside party, and certify that they are a true and fair view of the business. … A set of fraudulent accounts will often generate 'tells'. In particular, fraudsters in a hurry, or with limited ability to browbeat the auditors, will not be able to fake the balance sheet to match the way they have faked the profits. Inflated sales might show up as having been carried out without need for inventories, and without any trace of the cash they should have generated. … Often, an honest auditor who has buckled under pressure will include a cryptic-looking passage of legalese, buried in the notes to the accounts, explaining what accounting treatment has been used, and hoping that someone will read it and understand that the significance of this note is that all of the headline numbers are fake. Nearly all of the fraudulent accounting policies adopted by Enron could have been deduced from its public filings if you knew where to look. … The problem is that spotting frauds is difficult and, for the majority of investors, not worth expending the effort on. That means it is not worth it for most analysts, either. Frauds are rare. Frauds that can be spotted by careful analysis are even rarer. And frauds that are also large enough to offer serious rewards for betting against them come along roughly once every business cycle, in waves. Analysts are also subject to very similar pressures to those that cause auditors to compromise their principles. Anyone accusing a company publicly of being a fraud is taking a big risk, and can expect significant retaliation. It is well to remember that frauds generally look like very successful companies, and there are sound accounting reasons for this. It is not just that once you have decided to fiddle the accounts you might as well make them look great rather than mediocre. If you are extracting cash fraudulently, you usually need to be growing the fake earnings at a higher rate. So people who are correctly identifying frauds can often look like they are jealously attacking success. Frauds also tend to carry out lots of financial transactions and pay large commissions to investment banks, all the while making investors believe they are rich. The psychological barriers against questioning a successful CEO are not quite as powerful as those against questioning the honesty of a doctor or lawyer, but they are substantial. And finally, most analysts' opinions are not read. A fraudster does not have to fool everyone; he just needs to fool enough people to get his money. If you are looking to the financial system to protect investors, you are going to end up being disappointed." [4]

        "I think the observation about accounting fraud being a priority [at the SEC] is a fair one. Co-director Ceresney recently gave an entire speech devoted to financial reporting and accounting fraud, where he highlighted the SEC's Financial Reporting and Audit Task Force, which they call the Fraud Task Force. It has 12 lawyers and accountants, who are using analytical tools to identify companies that are likely to have revenue recognition and other accounting issues." [5]

        "Twitter's red-hot stock offering last week makes clear that, as in the first Internet bubble, investors will pay up for a company even if it hasn't turned a profit. And managers of companies that have generated only losses, like Twitter—and even those that are profitable—are happy to suggest metrics that they think are better suited for assessing their operations. Managements' recommended measures, typically not found in generally accepted accounting principles, have an uncanny way of burnishing a company's results. They do so by eliminating some pesky costs of doing business. As such, these benchmarks are also known as earnings without the bad stuff. They were central to the valuations that propelled Internet stocks skyward in the late 1990s. Then, the higher the market climbed, the kookier the metrics became. … But the idea that these items don't cost the company is nonsense, says Jack T. Ciesielski, an accounting expert at R.G. Associates in Baltimore and publisher of The Analyst's Accounting Observer. … To plumb the popularity and pervasiveness of such metrics, Mr. Ciesielski and his associates analyzed filings from technology and health care companies in the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index. … But Mr. Ciesielski said companies' creativity in accounting metrics was on the way to becoming ridiculous." [6]

        "In October 2000, short seller James Chanos labored through Enron Corp.'s annual report, underlining complicated passages and scribbling exclamation points and question marks. … While even he found the filings hard to understand, to him they raised multiple red flags. … For their part, Wall Street analysts argue that they have limited time and resources for the in-depth research that Mr. Chanos prefers. Many cover dozens of companies." [7] "What mostly interested him [Chanos] were a few simple numbers available to anybody who took the time to look: the company's ostensibly brilliant managers were earning just seven percent a year on capital that was costing them more than ten percent to borrow. Enron was bleeding itself dry." [8] 

        "PricewaterhouseCoopers, which signed off on Satyam Computer Services Ltd.'s finances for several years without detecting the fraud by Satyam's founder and chairman, defended its procedures on Thursday. ... Satyam Chairman B. Ramalinga Raju said Wednesday that he had created a fictitious cash balance of more than $1 billion and inflated accrued interest, profits and debts owed to the company. ... As part of an end-of-year audit, accountants would have had to verify the amount of money owed to the client.... [M]r. Raju said the company's cash and bank balance had been inflated by more than $1 billion dollars. ... Normally, checking bank statements wouldn't be considered sufficient under Indian or U.S. rules -- the auditor would also need to get direct confirmation from the bank. For investors who relied on Satyam's financial statements, the fraud would have been difficult or impossible to discover. 'When a fraud goes so far as to misreport cash, finding warning signs of the fraud becomes quite problematic,' said Charles Mulford, an accounting professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology. There were some red flags though. One indication of fraud accountants often look for is a discrepancy between net income and operating cash flow, the amount of cash a company spits out from its operations. ... Another warning sign was a sharp increase in assets held in the company's bank deposits." [9] Books authored by Professor Charles Mulford have long been on our list of Recommended Readings.

         "The chairman of one of India's largest information technology companies admitted he concocted key financial results including a fictitious cash balance of more than $1 billion, a revelation that sent shock waves across corporate India and is likely to prompt investors to question the validity of corporate results as the once-hot economy slows. B. Ramalinga Raju, founder and chairman of Satyam Computer Services Ltd. -- "satyam" means truth in Sanskrit -- said in a letter of resignation that he also overstated profits for the past several years, overstated the amount of debt owed to the company and understated its liabilities.  Eventually, he said, the scheme reached 'simply unmanageable proportions' and he was left in a position 'like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten.'  The news prompted concerns about corporate governance and accounting standards across Indian industry, especially since Satyam was audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers and had high-profile independent directors, including a Harvard Business School professor, on its board until recently. ... Immediate comparisons were drawn to the watershed in U.S. corporate accounting and governance standards that stemmed from the Enron crisis. ... The corporation grew into India's fourth-largest technology company by sales, employing 53,000.... It counts among its clients global giants such as Nestlé SA, General Electric Co., Caterpillar Inc., Sony Corp. and Nissan Motor Corp. ... In his five-page confessional letter to Satyam's board, Mr. Raju said that initially the gap between the company's actual operating profit and the one reflected in the books had been marginal. But as Satyam grew in size and its costs increased, so did the size of the gap. Mr. Raju fretted that if the company was seen to perform poorly, it could prompt a takeover attempt that would expose the gap, so he concocted ways to plug it. Among them: pledging the shares he and other company backers owned to raise a total of $250 million in funds for Satyam in the past two years. He said the loans, which weren't reported on Satyam's balance sheet, were based on 'all kinds of assurances' and were designed to allow Satyam's operations to continue. ... But the ruse became increasingly difficult to maintain as the company's fortunes dwindled." [10]

        "The problem was that Dynegy's cash flow from operations wasn't keeping up. And eventually analysts and investors might interpret that discrepancy as suggesting that the contract valuations had been too high. … Executives called it Project Alpha. Designed primarily by the company's tax division…. Arthur Andersen LLP, Dynegy's auditor until last month, blessed the benefits created by Project Alpha…. Independent accounting experts say they see little business justification for the Alpha transactions, apart from improving the appearance of the company's books…. [T]he nation's top financial institutions and law firms reap big profits from helping American corporations set up complex accounting arrangements aimed at least in part at touching up their financial portraits. Dynegy paid a total of $33 million in Project Alpha fees to, among others, Citigroup and Vinson & Elkins, a prominent Houston law firm. Citigroup and Vinson & Elkins were involved in Enron deals, as well. … [A] Dynegy spokesman, says the company disclosed Project Alpha appropriately. … There is no explicit reference to Project Alpha." [11]

        "[T]here are certain relevant financial ratios that can provide clues. For example, lending agreements oblige most companies across a wide range of industries to keep the debt level at no more than about seven or eight times earnings before interest payments, taxes and depreciation." [12]

        "Marc Cohodes is a short-seller ... who is respected, even by longs, for his ability to tear apart a balance sheet. And he is not the only short known for his willingness to rip publicly into corporate executives. But he is among the few shorts who is both. That combination, along with his recent triumph in helping to uncover hugely inflated sales at Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products, a Belgian software company that filed for bankruptcy in November, has made him highly visible at a time when short-sellers are regaining their status in Wall Street's ecosystem. … Mr. Cohodes, 41, is nothing if not creative in his research. He focuses on smaller technology companies with financial results that appear stronger than their products. Then he combs balance sheets and income statements, seeking clues that a company is inflating profits or faking sales. Is the company making a lot of sales to buyers that are also controlled by its executives, in what are called 'related-party' transactions? Are receivables -- sales for which the company has not yet been paid -- piling up on its books? Do a lot of its sales originate in less-developed countries, where auditors many not be as strict? Has it found ways to hide its costs by categorizing recurring expenses as capital spending? Is it reporting profits even though its cash flow is negative? Those possible tip-offs are visible on a balance sheet for investors who know where to look. If Mr. Cohodes sees them, he will look deeper, calling the company's clients and suppliers and asking questions: Do its products work? Does it pay on time? Has it asked customers to buy more than they need now in return for discounts later. … But the more red flags Mr. Cohodes sees, the more excited he becomes. … Lernout & Hauspie is the stock that cemented Mr. Cohodes' reputation. … After examining the company's financial statements, he decided that Lernout had pumped up its revenue with related-party transactions. Later, he and other short-sellers helped point The Wall Street Journal and TheStreet.com to problems with the company's sales in Singapore and South Korea. … In January 2001, after several critical articles in The Journal, Lernout filed for bankruptcy in Belgium. ... Over all, Lernout booked $277 million in fake revenue between 1998 and June 2000, one-third its total sales, according to the company's audit committee. … Professionals rarely short companies simply because they believe that their stocks are overvalued. They prefer to focus on companies with financial statements that they believe are misleading or fraudulent, companies that may be booking nonexistent sales or selling products to themselves in sham deals. ... 'But again, we do not want to short legitimate companies.'''  [13]

         "[I]BM does not have growing revenues. Its top line—the hardest number to manipulate—has risen just 5% annually since 1995. … Gross profit margins—the share of revenues left after subtracting the cost of goods sold—are narrowing too….  Indeed, it is rather amazing that investors have been willing to suspend their disbelief as long as they have. Doubts about IBM's earnings quality have been raised for years….  Some financial sleuths have long argued that cash flow from operations is a better way to judge a company's performance. This measure paints a drastically different picture of IBM than EPS does. … So while earnings have grown magnificently, cash flow—the actual spendable, re-investable, bankable money that the business generates—has contracted…." [14]

        "Standard &Poor's will shortly launch … a new product that allows banks, insurance companies and institutional investors to use the Internet to obtain a fast and cheap online, computer-generated estimate of a company's creditworthiness. Called CreditModel, the new product is essentially a group of sophisticated computer models… S&P is quick to emphasize that CreditModel is no substitute for a full-blown credit analysis. … A bank or other subscriber selects the business sector in which the company it is interested in examining operates, its geographic location and then enters a number of financial statistics or ratios, such as revenue, equity, total debt and pretax return on capital. … The model delivers a credit 'score…. [S]&P [] acknowledged … '[I]t's not an opinion of creditworthiness.'"  [15]

       "[E]xamine how the company's inventory turnover ratio has changed from year to year. You compute this ratio by referring again to the income statement for the revenue figure, then dividing that number by current inventories, which is listed on the balance sheet. A ratio rising from year to year is good news, but a declining one is an indication that the company's products are not moving well." [16]

        "[A] test of business health ... depend[s] heavily on financial ratios as indicators of a business's prospects. What these ratios don't disclose is the outlook for a company's market or the strength of its competition, factors that can either save some mismanaged companies or upend the most efficient of managers." [17]

        "[T]he story of the dramatic rise and fall of Frigitemp involves an abuse of a common accounting method for long-term construction projects. … Internal Arthur Andersen documents show … early moves [] to encourage Frigitemp to make more frequent use of 'cost to cost percentage of completion accounting.' This is a technique that allows a company to declare income from a long-term construction project before the income is actually received. The method was damned eight years ago in a Senate committee report as one of the most trouble-prone forms of 'creative accounting.' The technique assumes that if, for example, 25% of the costs of material needed for a project had been spent, the project could be declared 25% completed and, thus, 25% of the income to be derived from it would appear on the books." [18]


[1] WSJ, 2/3/20, "Bernie Ebbers, 'Telecom Cowboy' Who Built WorldCom, Dies at 78...."

[2] WSJ, 11/19/19, "Companies Adjust Financial Communications to Resonate With Humans and Robots; As markets scour financial statements for trading clues, executives turn to machine-learning tools, perception studies and speech recognition to help them choose their words carefully"

[3] NYT, 9/9/18,"Tesla Needs to Build Investor Trust. The Exit of Its Accountant Won't Help."

[4] The Guardian, 6/28/18, "How to get away with financial fraud"

[5] California Lawyer, January 2014, 2014 Roundtable Series-Securities

[6] NYT, 11/9/13, "Earnings, Without the Bad Stuff"

[7] WSJ, 11/5/01, "What Enron's Financial Reports Did -- and Didn't -- RevealEnron Short Seller Detected Red Flags In Regulatory Filings"

[8] Yale Alumni Magazine, Sept/Oct 2013, "The Fraud Detective"

[9] WSJ, 1/9/09, "Pricewaterhouse Defends Its Audit Procedures"

[10] WSJ, 1/9/09,"Fraud Rocks Satyam as Chairman Resigns Overstated Profits Raise Investor Concern About India Oversight"

[11] WSJ, 4/3/02, "Number Crunching: Enron Rival Used Complex Accounting To Burnish Its Profile --- With Help From Citigroup, Dynegy Inc. Addressed A Cash-Flow Concern --- 'Project Alpha' to the Rescue"

[12] WSJ, 12/31/01, "How to Spot Signs of Companies' Distress"

[13] NYT, 7/8/01, "Thriving on Bursting Bubbles"

[14] Fortune, 6/26/00, "Hocus-Pocus How IBM Grew 27% A Year[.] Do you want to believe in the IBM miracle? Then don't look too closely at the numbers."

[15] WSJ, 6/17/99, "S&P to Offer Cheap, Online Credit Analysis"

[16] Chicago Sun - Times, 4/24/88, "Annual reports: Careful reading can alert potential investors"

[17] WSJ, 5/15/87, "Small Business (A Special Report): Growing Pains --- Warning Flags Up...."

[18] WSJ, 9/21/84, "Tale of Deceit: Why Arthur Andersen Was So Slow to Detect Chicanery at Frigitemp --- Biggest Accountant in U.S. Audited Concern's Books But Missed Irregularities --- Expensive Secret Settlements"

Sample Analyses

 

        "The horrendous accounting fraud—what we saw in Enron, Tyco, and WorldCom—is relatively rare. It breaks the law and violates accounting standards. Accounting manipulation that I like to call accounting shenanigans is different. It tends be done within the letter of the law and technical interpretations of accounting standards but present[s] a misleading picture of the economic performance of the company. Sadly, this is quite common. …. There are no smoking guns here. You have find signs of companies camouflaging problems." (3/4/14, CFAInstitute.org, "The Sherlock Holmes of Accounting: Howard Schilit Explains the Mystery of His Art")  HAv2.3 shows you the signs.

 

        We have produced various HAv2.3 analyses that timely revealed financial statement distress and/or fraud, e.g., Enron, Satyam, Tweeter, J.C. Penney, American Apparel, Aeropostale, Ascena, Bed, Bath & Beyond, Bombay Company, Blockbuster, Bebe, Body Central, Circuit City, Coldwater Creek, Crazy Eddie, dElia*S, Eddie Bauer, Francesca's, Gadzook's, Goody's Family Clothing, Gottschalk's, Helig-Meyers, Kmart, Monaco Coach, Pacific Sunwear, Party City, Quick Silver, Radio Shack, Sharper Image, Warnaco, Westpoint Stevens, Wet Seal. (We continuously update HAv2.3. The analyses presented here are based of the version of HAv2.3 that existed at the times of the respective analyses. We will provide the most current version upon request.) Using HAv2.3, a stock investor could have avoided costly errors, or if acting very aggressively, an investor might have initiated short positions or sold a Put option.

        Our Satyam HAv2.3 Analysis detected problems, e.g., 62% Probability of Manipulation in 2004, and our Enron HAv2.3 Analysis detected financial problems while the market price of Enron's stock was rising to its all-time high. The early identification of financial issues within Enron, specifically with HAv2.3, would have allowed an investor to capitalize on the significant increase in the stock price. Conversely, it would have also prevented them from experiencing the subsequent and detrimental decline. In the case of short-selling or Put-buying, it would be advisable to wait until the problem is acknowledged by the mass media and the stock's market price commences its decline after a considerable upswing.

Disclaimer

 

        Someone asked why few stockbrokers have large yachts.

 

        "It isn't a mistake to try lowering your risk. It is a mistake, however, to assume that the future will resemble the past, that rules are infallible and that you should dive into any one strategy with both feet." [1]

   

        "Investors are constantly under the false impression that they or some vaunted expert knows something that will help them gain an edge. Unfortunately, people in the prediction business aren't very good at it. The old joke says that economists were invented to make weathermen look good." [2]

 

        "The [predictor] is too new to have much of a record. Financial history is littered with [] predictors that worked great using historical data that promptly failed when used to predict the future. It didn't work 'out of sample,' as statisticians would say. So, it remains to be seen how useful the [predictor] will be." [3]

 

        "Finance Sharing Is for Chumps. Financial experts argue for a great variety of investment strategies, but these approaches all have one thing in common: Once the word is out about them, their returns shrink. That's the finding of a couple of finance professors who looked at 82 market strategies—differences in valuations that gave investors a chance to profit and were then described in academic papers. In a working paper, the authors estimate that the average return decays after publication by about 35%. This seems to happen mostly because investors learn about the strategy from the academic papers and trade on it, thereby diminishing the advantage (in keeping with the way markets are supposed to work). The effect is most pronounced, the professors write, with strategies focusing on stocks with large market capitalization, high-dollar-volume trading and dividends." [4] "Investing is so competitive that history can rarely repeat for long; if any past pattern reliably recurred, so many people would pounce on it that it would soon stop working." [5] This study might assume that all investors would be willing or are able to replicate the efforts necessary to engage in financial statement analysis.

 

        "Confirmation bias is one of the biggest problems in investing. We all have a set of core beliefs, and we tend to surround ourselves with people who also believe them and focus on information that validates them. … But there is a danger in following only the people and data who support what you believe. It can blind you to the other side of the argument, especially when your beliefs are strongly held. And there is almost always another side. … [F]ollowers of value strategies want other value investors to panic during periods of underperformance. That bad behavior is in part what makes it work. Permanent followers of the strategy who won't panic no matter how long it under performs can reduce its effectiveness over time. And as more investors become educated about the negative effects of their behavior, it is possible they will stick out the downturns more. … The point of this exercise wasn't to suggest that value investing is dead. …No matter what style in investing you use, it is very easy to get caught up in a feedback loop that does nothing but support it. But by doing that you lose the ability to question yourself. You lose the ability to figure out how you might be wrong." [6]

 

        "However confident one is when making a trade on a stock, bond or other financial instrument, someone on the other side of the transaction has good reasons for feeling otherwise. What if he or she is right and you're wrong?"[7]

        The Committee of Concerned Shareholders and Financial Statement Analysis are not investment advisors. The information presented on this website was obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness and any opinions based thereon cannot be guaranteed. It is presented for general interest and educational purposes. It should not be construed to be: (a) advice concerning the valuation; (b) recommendation of the purchase, retention or sale; or, (c) analysis of the securities of any company. Those seeking such advice should consult with their advisors. The opinions, findings and/or conclusions of the authors expressed herein are not necessarily politically-correct and are subject to change without notice. Past results should not be interpreted as a guaranty of future performance.    

        In other words, if you think you lost money based on something you read here, don't come crying to us.



[1] WSJ, 9/19/20, "Some Investors Tried to Win by Losing Less. They Lost Anyway. The market has a way of soaking people who think they've found a way to beat it."

[2] WSJ, 7/12/16, "Why You're a Lousy Investor and Don't Even Know It"

[3] WSJ, 3/24/23, "Accounting-Fraud Indicator Signals Coming Economic Trouble…."

[4] WSJ, 11/9/12, "Week in Ideas"

[5] WSJ, 7/23/21, "Why Investors Can't Kick the 'Past Performance' Habit…."

[6] Validea's Guru Investor Blog, 1/29/19, "The Case Against Value Stocks"

[7] WSJ, 12/27/19, "Even With Inside Information, Traders Can Get It Wrong…."

 

 

 

FINANCIAL  STATEMENT  ANALYSIS

 

 

        To obtain further information or to share your feedback and suggestions, please contact us at:

 

FSA@ConcernedShareholders.com

 

 

 

Last Revised: October 20, 2024

 

This Website is Sponsored by:

 

Law  Office  of

LES GREENBERG

LGreenberg@LGEsquire.com

 

====

 

###